George Clooney
-
Posts
383 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by George Clooney
-
-
Mazel Tov.
Now go contemplate world peace together over a caffeinated beverage.
Â
-
-
-
Concise, to the point. Includes a tl;dr for those who have a micro attention span. 10/10
Good luck and have fun out there.
-
1
-
3
-
-
Seems clear enough. Good luck and have fun.
-
12 hours ago, Emperor Metalicraft said:
welp i hope them the less damage possible
also who tf paid 3 bil on them?
It will come out in due time if it isn't already common knowledge. I suspect that it already has in certain circles though.
FYI: S&B isn't friendless.
-
This could be a cool thing or a game breaking thing that will make it tougher for newer nations to catch up with older nations.
That said, I think as I see some examples for the sorts of things you have in mind and their effect, I'll have some input for you.Â
-
1 hour ago, Looking said:
quit just saying dnn you can say it but quit saying JUST dnn and actually make your posts longer
   Dinitronaphthalene
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
On 7/1/2023 at 10:08 PM, Jacob Knox said:
I wonder if there's a way for the admins to run a script that adds achievements not on a nation. Kinda doubt it, but... might be worth looking into for situations like this?
I conducted an audit for my own nation, and perhaps if everyone else did that it might help out Alex, then again it could also inundate him the admin staff with requests. An automated audit of all nations achievements would probably be best. Also a check of current scripts to make sure they are working properly (clearly at least one isn't) is also in order.
-
1
-
-
On 7/5/2023 at 7:45 AM, Insert Name Here said:
I'm gonna reserve my judgement for after the 1st global in this new meta. I have 1 huge concern though.
This will make blitzes considerably less effective, which imo can only lead to coalitions being even more reluctant to launch offensive wars, unless they have an even bigger advantage than most tend to do when they go on the offensive.
Therefore I'm concerned this will make wars less frequent and even more lopsided than usual, so hopefully I'm wrong.
If a war is won in the opening blitz, that war was probably a duck roll and lopsided from the first war dec. I will admit I had some serious concerns about the changes. But having fought some wars under them on Test, it does mean that you'll see more Moderate successes than you have in the past all other numbers of units being the same, but that's ok. We all could benefit from having additional wars that are a bit more competitive.
-
On 6/20/2023 at 3:12 PM, Alex said:
Huh, strange. I manually added it for you.
Thanks again.
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, Marshall Tucker said:
The Inquistion because they have over 200 members and less than 10 are active
Yipes, last time I saw something like that, I was fighting vampires in a Mexican bar.
-
I'd like it to be known that I am not a member of the Titans government, don't know anyone in Titan, and would turn down any offer to join their government, not that anyone is likely to ask, but would accept $5 million if offered with no strings attached.
-
Whelp, more lines drawn.
-
Found another missing one: I SEE YOU (Build the Spy Satellite National Project), which I purchased some time ago.
Â
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, Cajun_Yankee said:
Your mom
That's unfortunate. She seemed like such a good sport.Â
-
Seems like you are purposely fattening the chickens a bit for the foxes, and that may have unintended consequences down the road, but I like it in principle if the intent is to encourage activity and hopefully prevent more people from playing a few weeks, sitting back and saying the words you never want to hear: "I'm bored".Â
-
1
-
-
On 6/13/2023 at 5:25 PM, Anarchist Empire said:
You make it sound like coming back is a mistake. lol. We want them to though I think?
Mistake? No. My point was to agree with Keegoz. If you're unsure about your further participation or simply know that you won't be around, there is a remedy other than quitting. Indeed, you're more likely to return if you go into VM than if you have to start from scratch.
That said, SRD has a point though. People who simply disappear for three month aren't playing.
Statistically speaking, most are typically for good.
Â
-
8 hours ago, Keegoz said:
Vacation mode exists. Use it.
I am quite literally here because Vacation Mode exists. I walked away unsure I'd ever return.
3 hours ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:If you haven't logged in for over 3 months, are you really still playing the game? you know the amount of time that is 5 times greater than the amount of time you have put into the game. (This is coming from someone who has been playing since day 1 of the game aka almost 9 years.)
Numbers don't lie and the majority of people who are gone over 3 months never return. The numbers are worse for newer and smaller nations.
-
6 hours ago, Alex said:
That's a strange bug. I'll manually add it for you.
Thank you, kindly.
-
1
-
-
Given the large number of nations that were essentially producing resources on autopilot (and shouldn't have been around), how could eliminating them not cause radical changes in resource production? Seems like something that should have been foreseen. Â
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
24
-
9 hours ago, Sketchy said:
I'm the last person to ask if you want clarity lmfao.
'Wiki Mod' so it checks out. 🙃
Syndicate, INC Opens Business Office in Uritithu
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
So when faced with a group of alliances that have the potential to act in concert to suppress any smaller opposing bloc, what do you recommend? Hope they'll accept your offer of a NAP? Or maybe see who else sees the threat like you and then band together with them to create a much larger bloc to eliminate or reduce that threat?    Â