Felkey
-
Posts
520 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Felkey
-
-
Just now, Yui said:
Don't you dare. I've bagsied the next one...
Pretty sure it's already reserved, and then another one 6 months after that and on and on it goes....
-
Like I told zues, we gotta schedule these things in advance, I have another vacation planned for 6 months from now as well.
-
2
-
-
I didn't realize you cared so much, I ❤️ you too
-
9 minutes ago, Kastor said:
If its just a few days why couldn't you leave your nation up? Surely your alliance can protect its leader for a few days.
You misunderstood me, I said I'm leaving in a couple days ?
-
1
-
-
I'm gonna be drinking my ass off on a beach in a couple days, care for a drink? Name your poison.
-
3
-
-
3 hours ago, Sphinx said:
or if I should be annoyed that I'm now Felkey's pet......
Should be honored I consider you a pet you ungrateful cat thing ?
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:
The Commonwealth, I know we are not allies, but in your hour of need, I am willing to put the full military might of Grumpy behind your war effort.
I think we might need it against this daunting foe
-
3
-
3
-
-
Hi, reminder to put it in picture format because @Sargun can't read
-
1
-
-
35 minutes ago, Buorhann said:
They also didn’t rebuke any of Sketchy’s points either after they posted those logs.
Just because you chose to ignore the points they made doesn't mean they didn't make them. Maybe you should try bringing up Pantheon again.
-
40 minutes ago, LeotheGreat said:
I mean Adrienne is literally the only one who can answer this besides our leaker. If these logs are stale she should have no problem doing so.
Tbf, shifty's credibility is somewhere below that of a tabloid/conspiracy theorist. Pumping out irrelevant info or pure bs is kinda his thing
-
5
-
6
-
-
26 minutes ago, Kevanovia said:
Pineapple does not belong on pizza
Pineapple and ham or pineapple and bbq chicken on pizza is great.
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
-
But GoB is 3 fewer letters and typing those extra letters would be :effort:
-
1
-
-
Don't join anyone, just delete.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
Valid CB: that grammar
-
1
-
6
-
On 8/14/2018 at 5:34 PM, Buorhann said:
We could have. Military ramps up score pretty high. If any of them demilitarized too much, we certainly attempted on hitting them, forcing them to remilitarize again.
Hell, a couple of them rebuilt fully after taking damage from up declared battles.
You are correct on your assessment for the most part though.
Gotcha. I know Sketchy was trying to develop a script for it, but it's near impossible iirc. So it makes sense if you guys had to pull it manually.
There were numerous members with hundreds of millions in cash alone and 60-100k resources on hand that we were able to keep perma blocaded until we looted most of their stuff, so while there may have been one big loot job on tkr's bank, all those individual but still sizable loots still stacked up
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, James II said:
Steve's war was way more climatic. We had the stage on the OWF for months. Nothing but silent whimpers from both sides in this war.
Size, especially length, matters
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, James II said:1 minute ago, Horsecock said:
30+31+4=71
Thank you.
Here's a statement that I never thought would come out of my mouth.... I agree with Horsecock.
-
2
-
-
In regards to term number two, I hope to be seeing this very soon on their alliance page.
-
3
-
2
-
-
Just now, Buorhann said:
TCW was a target? Huh. I didn't see that in the logs that was posted.
Where did I specify TCW? I've mostly used "we". I'm also pretty sure we were indirectly mentioned as tkr and friends. Even if we weren't we would be obligated to defend them.
-
1 minute ago, Buorhann said:
You mean the logs with Hwan where Horsecock was encouraged/baited to talk more about TKR itself before they had allied up with us? lol. Where it even stated that "the idea" (Which was a month prior to us signing) was to get TCW and Guardian too? (Don't forget the date to flip and ally up with us, btw)
Are you trying to drown out the key facts with irrelevant details again? Are you now denying you would have defended KT in the event we attacked only them? If he was baited into talking about tkr, that's his problem.
-
7 minutes ago, Prefontaine said:
You’d argue. You’d be wrong. If you attack someone you are the aggressor regardless of provocation.
If I’m working the logistics of punching you in the face, and you premptively punch me in the face you’re the aggressor. Not to mention the one being charged with assault.
Please dont try and play play the game of claiming your attacking someone was defensive. It just makes your side look bad, always has, always will. I mean ffs you don’t even have the benefit of playing treaty chess by doing it. The only point to trying to claim your attack was actually a defense is to trigger MD treaties, which you don’t need.
TKR attacked. They’re the aggressive party. Embrace it.
If someone is planning to murder me and I shoot them when they are staking my house I don't think you would find many juries to convict me once the evidence of their plot was exposed.
-
9 minutes ago, Sketchy said:
A preemptive strike is when an alliance attacks another alliance right before that alliance attacks them to gain an advantage, Even if the paranoia you have espoused was true, by your own admissions previously, this so called "plot" was not supposed to happen for months, meaning its not really a preemptive strike. so
Of course, every time I hear it the timetable changes, first it was supposed to be September (literally 4 months after this war started, 5 after our previous war) Then it suddenly became June, for reasons unknown, although perhaps this latest narrative is why.
You also previously tried to claim that this counts as you "doing something", and now are trying to claim its reactive rather than proactive. This is giving me odd flashbacks to someone else thought they could claim both a proactive attack whilst simultaneously claiming it was a reactive strike. I wonder who that was?
Also, I see you are now claiming KT is the one trying to rally the gang together to roll you, what happened to it being all part of Buorhann's evil plan? Why the sudden shift in direction?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact is, you guys couldn't handle it when we called you out for various things you did which were questionable at best, and hypocritical at the most. Things that in the past we all shared a common ground on, things that we called out others for. It bruised your ego, and despite the fact we called out multiple other alliances at around the same time, for their own shit, you guys became convinced it was evidence of us having a vendetta against you. You then let that play into your paranoia and grasped at any straws you could find in order confirm your beliefs. A rumor here, a mean comment there, some logs taken out of context and a boogey-man figure in Buorhann for you to pin all your nightmares on.
The fact you felt the ever-pressing need to implicate Buorhann in your obviously weak CB and then expand upon that to smear him shows how far you've lost touch with reality. You are oblivious to whats going on around you and have lashed out, burning yourselves in the process with out even realizing it. I haven't been super talkative during this war or prior to it, as the forums have become rather toxic lately, but its been rather amusing watching all this play out. You've slowly begun to embody many of the negative traits we so strongly opposed in IQ without even realizing it.
Of course, everything I stated above is the generous take on all of this, at least for TCW and TKR. The less generous take is that you were aware of what you were doing from the get go, and fueled by a bruised ego and OOC issues you decided to intentionally pursue this course of action. You of course, couldn't claim that us a CB, as that was a two-sided affair, and wars driven by OOC are generally frowned upon. Now, I don't see any overwhelming evidence to suggest that yet, and since I don't subscribe to the same level of paranoia that you do, I'm still leaning towards the former scenario, which is why I focused on it. But after TRF revealed their CB, its certainly not a stretch.
A preemptive strike can be any time before a confirmed threat intends on taking action. It doesn't matter if it's 2 days or 2 months. The timeframe doesn't matter, all that matters is we have your ally's high gov saying they plan on hitting us (that's not really paranoia, it's reading comprehension). As for hitting tgh buorhann has already stated he would have defended them anyways, something we assumed and so we decided to hit you anyways. So if anything buorhann has implicated himself, so excellent job. As for calling people out, the most you guys have done is spout random BS concocted with limited thought at best. The crap you guys spray on the forums really has nothing to do with it.
-
19 minutes ago, Buorhann said:
What exactly were you preempting again?
Pay special attention to that horsecock guy, you know, the one who happens to be your ally's head of milcom.
-
9 minutes ago, Buorhann said:
You folks are really putting a lot of thought into this.
(Just a tip: TKR and Friends are the aggressors in this conflict)
Are we? I'd argue that a preemptive strike is not really agressive but a necessity based on the information received prior to the strike. You know what they say, the best defense is a good offensive, and that is particularly true in this situation. Should we have waited for KT to rally a gang together to come and hit us first? Attacking because someone else forces you to do so does not make you the aggressors, it makes you reactive.
-
1
-
Welcome back Felkey! (A video tribute)
in Orbis Central
Posted
The bots shall form a council and rule in our place