ComradeMilton
-
Posts
1777 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by ComradeMilton
-
-
On 11/24/2019 at 3:30 AM, Sval said:
NPO can't be part of this bloc.
They're protecting it.You might be surprised what you can do if you believe in yourself.
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:
No confidentiality was breeched as no confidentiality clause/agreement existed.
There has never been such an agreement it's just how it's done. You know what you did even if you want to pretend otherwise. You leaked.
5 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:Moreover, when you refuse private inquiries (relating to t$) and directly lie about ongoings in private channels on multiple occasions in an attempt to frame your counterparts as being the culprit of the stagnation of a process you hav deliberately frustrated, you give them no incentive to further submit to your demands.
CoA is the culprit.
Just now, Kastor said:I’m confused on who wants reps.
CoB won and has a right to provide demands that will be completed in exchange for peace. The same goes for tS, though theirs is separate. This is public so I can't really say who wants what.
-
18
-
-
17 hours ago, Prefonteen said:
I am Partisan, not pre. Furthermore, I am not leaking, I am disclosing matters pertaining the alliance I lead and the coalition I (along with others) represent.
You're taking private logs and posting them publicly. That's leaking.
17 hours ago, Prefonteen said:You are not the first coalition B official, negotiator or member threatening our negotiators with repercussions if we disclose the misconduct of your negotiators. I will, as I have done in the past, state once again that The $yndicate will not allow coalition B to dictate the degree of transparency it pursues in its dealings. If you don't want to look like shit, don't act like shit.
The conditions are the discussions are not public. That's why you haven't been posting them before and the previous attempts by CoA to conduct them openly have failed. tS is welcome to remain in a state of war if they so choose and lacks an ability to 'allow' CoB to do or not do anything.
16 hours ago, Smith said:It really says a lot that this thread has been up for more than 24 hours and so far nobody is disputing the proof of Coalition B's stalling, instead they are only making threats because the evidence was provided.
We're still not going to do public stuff just because Pre leaked private logs. The condition of this being done in private remains.
12 hours ago, Thalmor said:What are you going to do about it? Stall peace talks?
IDK. End them? If CoA is unwilling to accept how post-war negotiations work there's not much for CoB to do. These are done privately and no matter what Pre may think that hasn't changed since he violated it.
-
1
-
13
-
-
19 hours ago, Reuben Cheuk said:
They're tasked with ending a war, not interfering with Coalition A's diplomacy. This clearly shows that B has an ulterior motive.
You know their goal?
Regarding Pre leaking I hope he understands that has consequences.
-
9
-
-
The membership has also changed. You haven't checked, you're just assuming we have the same people. We do not.
-
10 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:
There is no merit for us in playing along if there is no desire for peace.
Perhaps that's why they stopped speaking to you.
-
13
-
-
6 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:
Maybe I wouldn't be forced to seek out the OWF if my alliance and half my coalition had not been deliberately ignored in private channels for 3 weeks. t$ has not been allowed to "negotiate".
You choose to do this. You're not "forced" to post at all. TS needs its own channel from what I've read and if you're not negotiating reasonably or acting like this is an equal negotiation it's quite natural that you might not be receiving responses as quickly as possible. Our representatives are likely waiting for you to be more cooperative before continuing.
2 minutes ago, Filmore said:Obviously you didn't pay attention to the post at all, for his complaint is that he's trying to negotiate for peace but Coalition B is just giving him the run around. Not only that, buts he's also added sufficient logs to back up his claim. So do us a favor and actually bother to read the post before you try to complain about it.
I read it in full. I explained he log dumped, even. This isn't going to help his side in negotiations at all. Perhaps Coalition B doesn't want its discussions linked so it's stopped responding for that reason when there was a log dump relatively earlier. This certainly isn't going to help anything.
4 minutes ago, Darth Ataxia said:You should get to know our snake friend better. Your supposition that he likes to complain and log dump more than attempting to start a negotiation process for the past 3 weeks is wrong.
I do.
3 minutes ago, Batavus said:Read more, troll less Comrade and you would know what you’re saying is nonsense.
I'm not trolling at all. I could, if you like, but that would be useful to establishing peace as a logdump.
-
34
-
-
You seem a lot more inclined toward log dumps and complaining on the OWF than negotiations. Maybe spend more time on the latter if that's a genuine desire of yours.
-
2
-
39
-
-
2 hours ago, Elijah Mikaelson said:
Who are you?
everyone know what GOONs stand for no matter how many times over the decades you name change, the issue is not the name change the issue is you always stay in the same lane, Goon Order of Oppression Negligence & Sadism made the lane you roll in, changing your name to Good Old Ordinary Newbie Slaves, do not make you any less of the GOONS of old.
Edit: Goon Order of Oppression Negligence & Sadism made shark week, something you all want to bring back, as i said same old lane with a new name.Who I am is on the alliance information page too. We're neither the Goon Order of Oppression, Negligence and Sadism, nor the Good Old Ordinary Newbie Slaves, nor the Goon Order of Neutral Shoving. As you might have noticed all had different governments, names, etc. Different see?
-
1
-
-
Aren't the Coalition B alliance member counts growing throughout? I know of none that aren't so we're not very worried about that. If you want to keep fighting that's probably going to work well for B. Will it for A?
-
14
-
-
On 11/11/2019 at 7:58 PM, Elijah Mikaelson said:
How can you say GOONS or whatever does not exist within the confines of the game, but go on to call him a name he is known by within the very same game Goon Order of Oppression Negligence & Sadism is known in?We're not called that. The previous instance in another game also was not called that. I think you're trying to force a decades or more deceased alliance onto this one and it's not working.To find out what this alliance is called you can click on stuff and go to the alliance page. It has the name written very clearly. Or send forums reports that'll never pass Alex's scrutiny and then look. Or don't. GOONS has no real motivation to make anything clear to you.
-
Forcing several nations complying with the rules to alter their theming and graphics to satisfy a personal grudge. Moderation as a weapon would be better describe in the rules as "Threats of Using Moderation as a Weapon" as this skipped threat and proceeded to try to force change against an alliance's members as harassment. Perhaps skipping the threat negates using it as a weapon, but if I were to describe a bulldozer as weaponized (referring to the Killdozer) that would really be weaponized, whereas if I were threatening to build and use a weaponized Killdozer that's more of a threat of weaponization.
Basically if any of the complaints were successful the object of this complaint will have successfully used moderation as a weapon or harassment. To discount it because it's action not threat seems like something to clarify in the wording to me, but I just bring this to you to make the judgement on.
-
4
-
2
-
-
12 hours ago, Isjaki said:
Even if I'm to believe you, I would let Alex take the call here. Since this is a no discussion forum, I shall reply no further.
You are actually one of the parties allowed to discuss in this NDF post. (I assume it's okay to post this since @Isjaki is reading neither the rules nor the pinned topics explaining how these forums worked and I wanted to make sure they knew should they ever have a valid complaint in the future.
-
1
-
-
Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=97760
Ruler Name: Isjaki
Nature of Violation: Attempting to use personal objections (or fictional objections) to a category of economics against some nations who are theming in-game in a SFW manner, Soviet, or even philosophical leaders, for in-game advantage. Particularly odd as communism and Marx are not forbidden by the forum rules.
Instances:
I assume these will all be denied as they're within the rules, but I did want to point out the attempted use of moderation as a weapon as these nations all seem to belong to alliances or associated alliances of an alliance that opposes Isjaki's.
@Isjaki tag so he can quote the rule forbidding any of this.
-
1
-
6
-
-
12 hours ago, Isjaki said:
Nation link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=182088
Nation name: Soviet Canuckistan
Leader name: Dommy Touglas
Communism is ideology that has lead to an estimated 100 million deaths worldwide. Communist imagery is banned in Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Latvia, Indonesia and Ukraine. It offends refined sensitivities that we allow such highly objectionable content within our community.
Since this is a NDF, I'm ND, just mentioning for Alex in case he doesn't already know that Soviet is Russian for something akin to a congress. The other term refers to Canada.
-
Let's Gazette going with total understanding and comprehension of this alliance news.
-
Which alliance is IC? I can't find it in the Alliance Ranking
-
3 hours ago, Sir Scarfalot said:
So, none of you have yet become one. Please stop trying to backseat mod.
I know you probably think this was clever, but :irony:
-
9 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:
I'm honestly not sure if this speaks badly of Goons, BK, both, or neither. For once in my shitposting career I genuinely don't know who to call a slave
Bangladeshis in Qatar. Who cancels an MD during a war?
-
20 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:
Says the alliance that's made more moderation warnings than the entire mod team put together.
So, you have not become one. Please stop trying to backseat mod.
-
9 hours ago, Sir Scarfalot said:
Not even close. They didn't put in the required tag; worse, there is no possible tag they could have put in the title since there is literally nothing of substance in the OP whatsoever.
When did you become a forums mod?
-
1 minute ago, Malleator said:
It's my understanding that this subforum is for alliance announcements, not for everyday funposting.
I see you've failed to note this is "Gazette"; an announcement.
-
9 hours ago, Malleator said:
i don't think this belongs in Alliance Affairs.
I suggest Orbis Central instead?These regard the affairs of an alliance, though. This is literally the place for this.
-
1
-
-
Who is loving the mass treaty dump? I know I am!
-
1
-
'Goons harassing players'
in Game Reports
Posted
You feel harassed that an alliance you were spamming responded sarcastically?
(The complaint is regarding the alliance so the valid parties are any GOONS and that one OP).