Jump to content

Mohammad

Members
  • Posts

    192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mohammad

  1. Solution: Bring back that you have to get ground battles to win a war. Airstrikes/Naval/Missiles/Nukes do not affect war progress, but are simply to secure stategic edge.

     

    Model 1) Each start with 100 resistance, Ground battles do 10 resistance each IT, yady yada, u know the drill. Basically only change is Airstrikes/Naval/Missiles/Nukes do not affect resistance.

     

    Model 2) You need to get N Consecutive Immense Triumph's in Ground Battles. If enemy is able to secure a pyrrhic victory when you are at N-1 victories, suck to be you, start over. Basically back to '16 wars.

     

    • Downvote 5
  2. Definitely would be a great idea. Would finally encourage people to use the aa markets, as well as market sharing. 

     

    Also a cool challenge for u econ people, is find a way to maybe incorporate Color Blocs into this. Maybe have it so you cant put tarrifs on aa in ur color bloc ect....

    • Upvote 1
  3. seems this thread is developing into something more of a "What should the Authority and Power of Alliance Governments over their Members be?: A Political Science Philosophical Debate, featuring distinguished guests @Kosta and @Zephyr" Instead of letting alliances embargo.

     

    Totally support adding AA embargos. Would add politcal dymanic to in-game economics, instead of the simple meta that currently stands.

     

     

    • Haha 1
  4. 18 hours ago, Wubba said:

    Knowing Alex, he'll make a rule that you can't do this anymore. Such a killjoy. 

    Alex doesnt care wither you stay at your laptop for 45 min clicking "Watch Rewarded Ads", or if a bot does it for you. He cares that the company sees 25 ads watched. period. 

     

    He gets his irl cash to feed himself, we get the LED lights on your laptop to display 2,000,000 more in pixels. Win-win-win

    • Like 2
  5. We all know best commie themeed aa is CTO. Join the Elaphant Revolution today.

    3 hours ago, Deborah Kobayashi said:

    I dont really have an issue with alliances being communist per se, but the ones whos names are just different combinations of the words "United, soviet, socialist, commune, nations, republics" are just bleh, They lack any form of creativity or originality. 

    I dont have an issue with communist alliances like ASM, atleast not on their theme, but there are too many alliances where the extent of their theme is "I'm communist, my name is USN#83, I will not merge with the 82 other USNs"

    ^^^^ amen

    • Haha 1
  6. Add a section in the revenue page before Alliance taxes that shows your theoretical net revenue w/o taxes. Right now, you have to manually do the subtraction to see how much you are contributing to the succses of the Grand Carthage Peoples Elephant Revolution.

     

    169744956_Untitleddrawing.thumb.png.f56478507f42d8c16d6c08e92c960ba3.png

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 5
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.