Jump to content

Them

Members
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

Posts posted by Them

  1. 17 minutes ago, Rosey Song said:

    See, this is why I keep insisting on the use of Cannon-fodder instead of meatshield.  Meatshield is so offensive.  Cannon-fodder is at least a powerful term.

    People never listen to rosey, and other people get their feelings hurt as a result ?

     

    Since I can tell the context will be lost, I'll point out ahead of time this is satire.

    Good luck rebuilding people who got peace, one day I might get to join you~

    I'd have to disagree. 'Cannon-fodder' implies that the individual in question is expendable, to be cast aside without question. Cannon are indeed powerful, yet the term 'cannon-fodder' itself is the most denigrating description that could applied to a combatant. Fodder is cheap animal feed—the type of two-bit mass-produced slop deemed unfit for human consumption, if there ever were such a thing. And as a hog devours the grain from its trough, so too are you swallowed and ground up and thoroughly digested by the insatiable furnace of war. The gasoline for an airstrike and you are one and the same.

    On the other hand, being a 'meat-shield' is a much more dignified existence. It suggests the ultimate sacrifice and purpose—that one is willing to give everything, self destruction notwithstanding, in order to defend an ally. Indeed, we must all strive to be meatshields on this glorious day.

    Ave Pacifica!

    • Like 1
  2. I'll just quote the game, "Tanks are ground battle enhancers. They dramatically increase the effectiveness of your ground army."

    Tanks are in a good place as is. Unlike with soldiers and planes, you must assess your situation to determine whether it is appropriate to build tanks or not. One of the major complaints with baseball is its mindless ‘clicker game’ nature, so I take more thinking between clicks to be a good thing. And both sides in the current war have deemed tanks to be valuable despite all their downsides. Tanks are a situational unit. If you build tanks while your opponent has air control, you rightly deserve to suffer.

    The concern over updeclares is certainly well founded. As the game stands, they are only possible because planes are fast to destroy and slow to build. Once prospective harpooners have to win an uphill battle on the ground as well as in the air, it becomes nearly impossible to effectively bring down a larger nation than your own.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2
  3. 52 minutes ago, Kerbollo said:

    Explain how you will fight an alliance of equal numbers as yours, that has a substantial whale tier and a strong supporting mid-tier, while yours have mostly mid-tier, is demilitarized, and is given only two days to prepare. In other words, the situation Chaos found themselves in at the start of Surf's Up.

    Answer that, and then you may argue that tC can potentially hold tier better than Chaos.

    You can’t, hence why you didn’t. You didn’t and so N$O didn’t have the opportunity to play Captain Ahab. It might come as a shock, but nobody is asking you to defend your e-reputation.

    It’s no more an indictment against your alliance than saying that BK has more members than SK.

    12 hours ago, Akuryo said:

    I'm declaring war on you with the CB of: you exist :P

    Anytime :)

  4. 35 minutes ago, Rosey Song said:

    Now we play mental gymnastics to try and consider them the same war.

    The only mental gymnastics here is interpreting "the war stats should not be taken at face value" as "the war we are fighting now is the same war as Surf's Up."

    Granted, there hasn't been any excessive fellating over the war stats, but Elijah's statement is an entirely fair one to make. War performance notwithstanding, it would be disingenuous to insist that BK + TC has the same potential to deal damage to KERTOG/Chaos as vice versa.

    7 minutes ago, Akuryo said:

    Honestly it sounds to me like you have no valid CB's and should just shut the hell up and go back to your gulag.

    Any CB is a valid CB, my friend :)

    • Like 1
  5. 2 hours ago, chanel said:

    it only took two years of doing nothing for Yakuza to join a war...defensively

    it seems really disingenuous to be like "oh we're really taking this war to heart as an ability for us to train" but you literally have been dodging wars since your existence and have never felt the need when you were a protectorate to help BK or whoever by joining in 

    Yakuza was the Principality of Zeon in the past. Don’t know why they bothered to rebrand if they decided to keep the weeb theme anyways...

    They fought in the Ayyslamic Crusade on KT’s side, so it isn’t fair to say that they have been neglecting their treaties or dodging wars their entire existence either ?

  6. 2 hours ago, The Mad Titan said:

    Do we win: “If there is one among you who wants to kill his general, his emperor, here I am”

    8BF71B97-A93A-4DD6-BE99-B7D94E329B54.jpeg.99fc01c5347f4ea5d5b09efede24335b.jpeg

    MEATY HANDS

    Players Online: Apeman, KillzBob, Darzy, Shiho Nishizumi, Shadowthrone, Akuryo, Thanos, Sir Scarfalot, Lionstar, Maia, Alucard Hellsing, Natalia Poklonskaya

    RNG: 50 - SCP Foundation

    THE GRACE OF AYYLLAH SMILES UPON US ON THIS GLORIOUS DAY.

  7. 5 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

    Hello. Are you certain that after tonights incident you wish to taunt The $yndicate? We've been rather courteous so far.

    Yep. Don’t care for a bit of playful banter?

    3 minutes ago, James II said:

    That wasn't the citation at the initial conflict. But now that you've brought it up, if t$ does something, and it's wrong. Does that mean you can do something and it is no longer wrong? I can live life easier knowing that t$ changes the definition of good and evil, or is morality only a matter of convenience?
     

    I think you’re projecting. t$ did nothing wrong there. Unsportsmanlike, maybe but definitely not immoral like you paint it.

    • Downvote 1
  8. 14 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

    But it *wasn't* on the page. Is it possible that AK looked at SG and thought "ISOLATED RAID TARGET" without having paid attention to your recruitment thread etc.? While i'm not going to comment much on the validity of their raid, the page was cited extensively to justify BK's intervention. Now that justification appears to be nonexistent.

    Hey there Partiboy. I’m sure it’s possible that DAK overlooked something, but since when has sloppiness been a defense for fricking up? Given the whole Oblivion-tC debacle, it’s pretty clear that you don’t believe in the necessity of treaties for intervention. For the sake of argument, let’s say that big bad BK is bullying helpless little DAK without reason. Will t$ step in to defend its protectorate from this unwarranted attack or is Orbis forever doomed to live under jackbooted IQ hegemony?

    • Upvote 3
    • Downvote 2
  9. 1) Nation Name: Kislev

    2) Preferred Swim Suit Cut: I'm having a plastic surgeon install steam turbines, 12 inch guns and triple torpedo tubes on my athletes.

    3) Are you willing to spend lavishly to bribe the judges?: We provide the judges and we'll channel a portion of the voluntary donations to you. Deal?

    4) Will you kill everyone to win?: Imagine being this insecure.

    5) Are you going to get pissed off when Fraggle Rock runs away mid Olympics with all money and laughs?: Will Fraggle Rock be pissed off when we do so at the start of the games?

  10. 16 minutes ago, Sketchy said:

    I mean, what are your solutions to improve player retention?

    The issue here is that I don't have the required data to know with accuracy why the retention rate is so low, neither does anyone else. So making major and incredibly sloppy changes just to maybe possibly improve retention maybe a little maybe a lot is not a particularly convincing topic of discussion.

    I would rather just see Alex focus on getting the game a higher degree of traffic. If we get 500 people per month, and only 25 people stay, then if we get 2000 a month, maybe we get 100.

    Certainly beats proposing half-baked major shot in the dark changes to a problem no one has the exact data to solve.

    Hell, the retention rate is 95% now apparently, and this isn't the first "lets make everything cheaper" suggestion we've had implemented in recent times. 

    Considering Sheepy's track history, he should avoid pushing out any large changes to the game at once. 20, 10, whatever. I just see that quite a few people oppose the change on principle or because it's Leo posting. Cost reductions to anything should theoretically decrease the interim between wars and war is inherently more interesting than not war, so that should increase retention.

    • Upvote 1
  11. 25 minutes ago, Lairah said:

    How long did that take? I know how quickly baseball can resolve itself, i don't much like the idea of essentially staring at the page for hours doing that. I'd use a bot, yanno, if that wasn't bannable for incredibly obvious reasons. I have... just under $37 million right now. Since you know how this works, i wanna ask. If, theoretically, i were to invest all of that right now, into baseball, how long does it take to break even. Assume for simplicity i'm able and willing to play it as much as you did. 

    All i've ever heard is not to waste time on it, i am genuinely curious.

    If you really care as much about playing the core game as you let on, a week for a 37 mil investment is a reasonable time frame. If you have no life and want to kill yourself, I managed 15 mil in a day once. I’ve since then gotten over caring about pixels.

    Want proof that Sheepy is terrible? Upgrading your players 1 point at a time is more efficient because it nets him marginally more ad revenue.

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.