Jump to content

Avakael

Members
  • Posts

    711
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Avakael

  1. 16 hours ago, Prefontaine said:

    Wars that can last over a month being decided in the first day where the winning side doesn't win the physical wars and has to sit there doing nothing is not a good system, nor is it fun. 

    Your sentiment is correct, but the way you intend to fix it won't actually make anything better. The winner will still be decided within the first round, because there'll be nowhere near as many nations rebuilding their way to try again from beige than there were nations available in the first place. You're just making the process more tedious and expensive for everyone involved. Otherwise you wouldn't be including points 4 or 5 to compensate, because both of them go against your stated intention in this quote- why would you, for example, make your military units 10% less effective when you come out of beige early, when a counteroffensive with everyone choosing to exit beige early at a specific time is the only tactic anyone would have available to try and re-take control of the war?

    In reality, the issues with the PnW war system run vastly deeper, and won't be fixed by tweaking individual components like the beige system. It should be rebuilt from scratch- not just MAP and beige, but wars themselves, military units, etc. PnW made things interesting over CN by splitting infrastructure, land and improvements out from a single national pool into individual cities- why not think about how to do the same for our armies?

    • Upvote 1
  2. I will add something here because I was one of the very, very few then members of t$ who actually wanted it to happen. The Syndicate sought to sign the NPO for the specific goal of shaking up the game and breaking the monotony of fighting the same war over and over- which we had done at least 4 times in a row before Knightfall and risked doing again due to how poor relations were between t$ and BK, for example. If you go back to the roots of t$ membership in the alliances we came from in the prior game, you can actually add yet another 3 or 4 major wars against the NPO (or coalition allies) in a row, going all the way back to 2013. For us, that was a montony well beyond anything this game faces now.

    • Upvote 1
  3. On 12/30/2021 at 6:10 AM, Changeup said:

    Let this be a reminder that PnW IRON is your average shit micro, and does not share anything with CN IRON other than a theme.

    I would argue that almost all of the import alliances are just average awful micros and a shadow of their former selves. I'll except GATO, because I wouldn't call them an awful micro, just a normal one. I'll also except Legion, which is wild, because historically, Legion had a legitimate, long term and deadly serious claim to the Worst Alliance Ever crown, and now they actually look kinda competent. I hope all the others feel crippling shame that they've been leapfrogged, though.

    EDIT: Also, Ampersand gets a pass because they got pwned by hackers while they still had 150-200 members, so they were never going to become what R&R was.

    • Like 1
  4. 12 hours ago, Arln said:

    Glad that is over. I don't know who was worse this war. Cataclysm backstabbing us or Oasis being wishy washy and indecisive and impossible to work with.

    It was Oasis for sure. Nothing wishy washy or indecisive about a backstab! 💪

  5. 7 hours ago, Leopold von Habsburg said:

    How shortsighted and elitist of you to not realize that lower-tier consolidation is just as important an issue as upper tier consolidation. The elitism present is your world views is extremely off putting good sir. Small nations matter too.

    No they don't.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.