dtc justice
-
Posts
214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by dtc justice
-
-
This is a good change, not broken at all. Should implement this now so we can test it out in the global @Alex
-
46 minutes ago, Roberts said:
I'd only support this if it came with a drastic reduction in plane casualties per attack. People already lose their airforce in a blitz typically. This would be just another nail in their coffin.
Plane v plane is too weak currently. Ground kills more planes than a dogfight does
-
I can see the benefit of having someone hide all nation descriptions, but to have it the way it is right now? Kind of defeats the purpose of people trying to make their profile purdy
-
3
-
-
Lolol what? These are by no means excessively long. The rule implemented i presume is for the nation's that have like 1000 lines of 1 letter per line
-
1
-
-
At what point does Phoenyx become warned for spam? This is like topic 8 with the exact same topic re worded each time
-
1
-
5
-
-
4 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
Not sure how you arrived at that conclusion. I was saying that Swamp had made an agreement to counter attack Quack if they attacked HM/TCW/Rose first. Which they did, so Swamp counter attacked.
Glad we agree 🙂
Imagine when he finds out that swamp was attacked by quack alongside HM, and that swamp is on the defensive and not the offensive.
Can't even get his narrative right lol
-
15 minutes ago, Jordan said:
I don't think you understand... No one will care about your conclusions... As I've stated, your ramblings have ensured that you are irrelevant when it comes to discussions in this war, and further in this forum and game politics for the time being.
My suggestion was literal. Step back, evaluate and come back when you have a position of influence.
If you want to be taken seriously and be relevant you have to earn it.Hes been told this many times
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Mayor said:
You got a little ways to go but good luck!
Tbh I think is an accurate display of Ockey's popularity.
Does it count if 1k of them were exploited lol
-
1
-
-
This would be bad for the food. If you look at the data charts food climbs like crazy until war, and then the supply collapses. Rinse and repeat.
-
This was fun to read ngl
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Vero said:
Okay firstly, we should not have won the spy war in NPOLT. It was due to extreme luck, as well as diligence from our coalition that we managed to get back those numbers.
Secondly, because of the spy changes and the increase of spies killed, comparing these two conflicts just does not match up. 27 spies killed in one op is unheard of prior to spy sat era. We could kill 15-17 at 60 spies and rebuild was 3 so your point of having an unproportionate ratio of spies killed to bought is mute.
Even just halving the effectiveness of spy sat would at least make things slightly more balances since spy sat is purely offensive and there are no projects to increase defense spies other than a war policy that could be better used as something else.
I won't comment on the amount of units killed in a spy op since I personally do not really care, nor can you make me care.
Even when Quack sphere opened (later) with our spies, those who were on the receiving end of our members who have spy sats were even like wtf. https://discord.com/channels/216800987002699787/677356210290425896/771881609627566080
And those who wanted to buy the sat had to give up near 1bn, we had c20s that sacrificed 2 cities value to obtain the spy sat. With the cost of the project so high, it should be as strong as it is.
-
2
-
2
-
-
Congrats on 4 years! We may be enemies right now but I always liked you folks
-
2
-
-
6 minutes ago, Shiho Nishizumi said:
DtC, both you and I know how the spy game is something that largely favors raw numbers for securing. Cases where it happened otherwise (e.g. NPOLT) was because of a combination of disjointed foes and the bulks being handled separately (NPO entering once Leo's BK and Covenant were already wiped).
Your side has a 2:1 advantage and actually opened with spy ops on us in the interim between CTO/TEst's hit and our hit on HM. We have the spy team (which is why you're practically 0'd, for example), but given the other factors winning it wasn't a realistic prospect in the first place. So you'd be best served to pocket that "git gud" card for the time being.During NPOLT, our side was outnumbered 10:1 in the spy front because of the two spheres having spies depleted from surfs up, and we flipped it. Its not all just purely who has the numbers. The mechanics themselves aren't broken.
Lets say for example spy kills capped at 6, your rebuy is 3-4, and with that ratio you will never really be able to grind an alliance down enough to spy military.
Lets also say you only kill 500 tanks per op, that basically makes spying irrelevant, so why bother?
Reality is there has been long days assigning ops to put us ahead. It is amusing that its always people on the losing side that says x should be nerfed, its simply just the way we all are, we all complain when we shit the bed
-
5
-
1
-
-
Lol wow, rawr is salty af
Reality is, our side did 5x++ more spy ops than your side in the first few days and they were ops strategically done. We put in the time and effort, and money for said spy sats, so yes it should be one sided for the spy game right now.
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
-
If spies killed 500 tanks maximum, and spy kills were max 5-6, then there would be 0 purpose for me to organize 500 spy ops for our coalition each day for the first 5 days to wipe your coalition, on average 5-10 hours per day organizing this.
The issue here is the lack of a spy team on your side, not a broken mechanic. You're only complaining because you are losing heavily.
-
6
-
7
-
-
Don't get confused with the ancient symbol and the nazi one, they do face different directions. If one is using the nation one specifically then they have poor intentions.
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, Vein said:
Hai, it’s not my rng being broken. It’s Alex needing to fix his own game
Yarr aren’t raiders, if you believe raiders are supposed to only «raid» then you’re doing it wrong. You have lots to learn as a raider/pirate pal.
Yarr historically were all ex arrgh that retired, not sure if all of them followed that trend now though
-
1
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Vein said:
Was awesome seeing you guys countering for one of your own when having the chance to. *thumps up*
Yarr has known to throw down once and a while.
Also hai, your rng is broken lol
-
This war is still going on? Oof, didn't even notice fleas were hitting us
-
Alex has confirmed that if he made approval ratings have any mechanical purpose, that he would reset everyone's approval back to 0
-
3 hours ago, Cjfly said:
So what your saying is plundering isn't enough so you want double destruction on every win then plundering and double destruction isn't enough so you also want a 99% win odds or else you would never declare war and people wouldn't play the game. "That's Crazy". I'm not saying it should be a 50/50 scenario cause the aggressor would always have the upper hand in coordination & planning since they are hitting first but the current balance should be somewhat fixed to allow the possibility of a defensive turn around. This is why we are in our current situation with players doing nothing to beige or war slot filling to get longer beige time because they can't do nothing but waste their time trying to counter.
In a lot of global wars the sphere that starts the war wins like half of the time. You need to have it set so that the aggressor has a far better chance of success.
-
14 hours ago, Cjfly said:
@dtc justice being blown up is part of any game and with all the wars I have been apart of in this
During trial of tiers, bk sphere full blitzed us, specifically bk near slotted rose. We flipped the war on them within a day and we very clearly won the first round, we had less members than bk. I guess we're the 1%? The aggressor should have a clear advantage, with the chance of a defensive comeback through coordination and planning.
If there isn't a clear advantage for the aggressor, there would never be any global wars. But im sure you would be happy with that coming from RnR.
Also, you're saying I have a 9th grade education? Dude, you have crazy long run on sentences lolol.
-
1
-
-
The 24 turn clause is really the only thing that makes all these changes acceptable.
-
3
-
-
Dudes just salty because he's being blown up
-
4
-
Where to now, Immortals and TFP?
in Orbis Central
Posted
Why would you expect to get answers about this on a forum? Your better off asking directly to those involved, but we all know they will ignore you as well.