dtc justice
-
Posts
214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by dtc justice
-
-
Could you kindly build up above 3263 score?
-
4
-
-
You can tell it was a nobody because they did an intel op before hand lol
-
4
-
2
-
-
6 hours ago, Rockychososo said:
- TCM was kinda OP at one point in time in 2019
I'd like to hear what Nokia considers op
-
1
-
1
-
Alliance of the Year: Rose
Most Powerful Alliance: Rose
Most Improved Alliance: TFP
Best Rookie Alliance (must be an alliance formed in 2020): error404
Most Missed Alliance: NPO
Best Alliance for New Players: rose
Most Honorable Alliance: rose
Most Immoral Alliance: goons
Most Controversial Alliance: NPO
Biggest Warmongers: Arrgh
Biggest Pixel-Huggers: RnR
Worst Fighting Alliance: WTF
Best Alliance Growth: Rose
Biggest Alliance Decline: NPO
Most Likely to Succeed in 2021: Rose
Most Likely to be Rolled in 2021: t$
Best Economics Department: Rose
Best Foreign Affairs Department:
Best Internal Affairs Department: Rose
Best Milcom Department: Rose
Best Government Line-Up: Rose
Best Bloc (can be a bloc that disbanded this year): Ketogg
Best Foreign Affairs Move: TFP and TI breaking off swamp
Worst Foreign Affairs Move: TCW to swamp
Best Treaty Announcement (please link):
Best Declaration of War (please link):
Best Propaganda Post (please link):
Alliance with Best In-Character Posts:
Alliance with Best Propaganda: t$
Best Alliance Ad (please link):
Best Flag (peacetime/standard flags only please):
Best War Flag:
Best Holiday Flag:-
1
-
-
Player of the Year: DtC Justice
Most Influential Player: Abbas
Most Likely to Succeed in 2021: Valkorion Baratheon
Best Alliance Leader: Valkorion Baratheon
Worst Alliance Leader: Dwight k Schrute
Best Government Member (not a leader): Lucianus
Best General Member: abbas
Most Missed Player: roquentin
Best IC Poster:
Poster You Most Love to Hate: Phoenyx
Best Villain: partisan
Largest E-Peen: DtC Justice
Best Fighter: DtC Justice
Best Raider: dryad
Most Controversial Player: partisan
Player You’re Pretty Sure will be Playing in 2050: sphinx
Player that is Worst at Responding to DMs: sheepy/alex
Best Player Avatar:
Best Player Signature: N/A
Best Nation Theme: Tifa Lockheart
Best Nation Page Design: Tifa lockheart-
1
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:
No, it's public denials from Alliance heads vs. Boyce's word, based on who knows what.
dtc, if I'm so irrelevant, why are you even responding?
Corpsman, you can look away if you like. As to me, this is just something I have to do.
You are irrelevant because nobody worth mentioning takes you seriously. You provide entertainment thats why I respond.
-
1
-
-
26 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:
No, I looked at all the evidence I could find. And what I found was a -lot- of evidence that no one was going to attack Quack. Not from anonymous sources, from the heads of Alliances! Tyrion, Kaz, Ronny, the very people who run the Alliances who you claim were going to attack you. And what do you have on the other side? Boyce -.-
To be fair, why would anyone tell you, an irrelevant player, if they were going to attack a sphere?
-
1 hour ago, Corpsman said:
@Phoenyx No offense, but I think a whole zero people are still reading your messages.
Don't tell him our secrets....we all just short reply to him so he spends 20+ min per response, wasting his time on a useless matter
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Phoenyx said:
I can easily seeing Tyrion saying it's opsec or ignoring, but not lying. How much have you actually spoken to Tyrion?
I actually know tyrion quite well yes. You're so zerod in on one thing and that's really just sad. The amount of hours you have invested into such a futile argument lol
-
1
-
-
12 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
Anyway, go on, believe that Tyrion lied to me and everyone else if it makes you happy. But just remember something- I never accused Partisan of lying. But you -have- essentially accused Tyrion of lying.
Everyone important in pnw is going to lie to you and others in your position when you ask about opsec stuff. They will either lie, or say it's opsec, or they will just ignore.
Same shit IRL, go ask the general of the military about what actually started the most recent war, or something else that's obviously opsec. He will tell you either to stfu and move along, maybe he will tell you what the news outlets know, whether its false or true, or he will just ignore you.
-
52 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:
Right, you trust Tyrion because you like his style of questions and thus you take his statements at face value without applying the same standard of scrutiny to them as you do with literally anyone else's statements. The fact that you disagree with and therefore scrutinize the statements Tyrion makes which you don't like is just further evidence of your intense and knowing bias.
This is all evidence which you have helpfully provided your own dang self.
Partisan actually has not merely "shown interest in" but in fact HAS done his due diligence and research on the subject, and in an intellectually honest and responsible manner to boot. Why you persist in believing such heinously inaccurate things about him is beyond me, really, since there's ample evidence to show that he has indeed looked very deeply into the matter. And since you'll ask, despite it being blatantly obvious, the evidence is that he's still a leader of a major bloc which has not fired him, expelled his alliance, nor disbanded. Which is what any halfway competent leader would do in the face of such an extraordinary failure on the part of another leader. Since they haven't, he must therefore have not failed so completely as you insist he has.
What you're neglecting, despite being told countless times and being shown a mountain of evidence in support of, is that unlike yourself, Partisan is an alliance leader. Which means that he both needs to be and in fact is responsible in his FA efforts, which includes both diligently and thoroughly investigating threats against the alliance as well as keeping the results of his efforts confidential. Confidential, by the way, mostly means keeping the evidence, sources of evidence, reasoning, and conclusions secret from irrelevant parties that scream victory from the rooftops and dump logs every time someone tells them something privately.
If Partisan had indeed just taken the Boyce rumors at face value and flatly declared war without following up nor considering what such a major action would entail, the entire bloc would have fired him. From a cannon. We didn't, since he DID do his research, he DID follow up, and brought the investigation to his peers for appraisal and deliberation. They deliberated, determined it was actionable, and took the appropriate actions. I can tell you this for certain because I AM privy to a fair chunk of that investigation. Yep, I said it: That info is there, I've got it up on my screen now, but I'm not going to give it to you nor will anyone else because it was given to us with the expectation of remaining confidential.
So, by all means feel free to continue faffing about, screaming for evidence and things to proudly leak for your own amusement. We'll be over here, actually trying to be intellectually honest and trustworthy, and actually getting that evidence. Do consider joining us when you grow up.
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree, its clear that Phoenyx has given evidence and we should trust him
-
4
-
1
-
-
46 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:
I agree that a lot of people do. But not -everyone-. Certainly not Alliances that are primarily defensive in nature, such as TFP, where I spent the first 2 months of my existence in Orbis. Tyrion has also made it clear that he doesn't like basing policy based on rumours, I imagine the same would apply to his reasons for going to war. But to each their own.
All it takes is a few major alliances that want to war for fun, and it drags most of the top 50 alliances in and they typically don't have a choice.
-
3 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
It's easy to claim that someone is biased. What's harder is to show evidence that this is the case.
In one particular instance, I actually knew more than Tyrion himself. Sometimes, it's not all about being in high gov and being privy to opsec. Sometimes you just have to ask the right questions to the right people. Now, I fully admit that there are limits to how much one can learn without certain security clearances, but I think that what I know concerning GW16 is enough to come up with some pretty reasonable conclusions, which I have already elaborated on. This doesn't mean I don't want to know more.
It's pretty amusing you think you knew more than tyrion at one point
If you're referring to the war itself specifically, maybe? But I doubt it. you have to realize people lie all the time to hide things that are opsec.
-
4 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:
I think I know a fair amount about the global war at this point, which is the main thing I've been talking about for a while.
Its also not about how much you know. If you aren't high gov or advisor to high gov like me and others like me, in other major alliances, then you are kept in the dark for opsec/fa reasons. For that reason you are a pawn, but you are a pawn with no eyes because you are dillusional about it.
Nobody worth mentioning trusts you because you bring every evidence to the forums, you lost that trust when you started the first thread on the topic. The longer you continue the topic on the forums the longer it will take for people to have amnesia over your actions, and you will be a pawn until you change.
-
Just now, Nokia Rokia said:
1. the closet comment after hearing they are trans
2. nice to know your 4 years amount to nothing also oh dear i been here since 2014 you still look youngtried this mister DTC it doesn't work they shrug it off as something not to touch i also tried this with goons it didnt work there either i was litterally told to many screenshots and ignored after i complained
If the ooc attacks are legit enough then ban threats happen on sheepys end, if it's minor ooc attacks and its consist then sheeoy will eventually step in. If you do this publicly then it just makes both parties look bad
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:
I disagree. I think I learned a lot, especially from Tyrion.
Why do you think I'm being intellectually dishonest?
I am.
You really haven't learned shit yet to be honest. You're still a pawn and will be a pawn for as long as you're in a micro. If you escape micros then you will be a pawn until you reach at least low gov, id argue until high gov.
You think you know a lot but you really don't yet.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Phoenyx said:
I disagree. I think people should be encouraged to ask questions because there are a lot of people here who -discourage- it. I may be a fairly new player, but that doesn't mean I just have to be a pawn in someone else's game.
Unfortunately if you aren't high gov in a major alliance then you are a pawn, like everyone else that's in the dark leading up to wars, and during wars. Same shit IRL, soldiers and common folk don't get to know the intricacies of war.
-
3
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
If you're having OOC dox attacks, handle it privately with sheepy like I did during gw16, making a thread about it is a sad cry for attention.
-
7
-
1
-
12 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
Not always hilarious. Basically, you have a bunch of bullies here who downvote anything they don't like and insult and such. But it's the way the game is played here, so you gotta live with it you know?
You're downvoted because everything you say is related to the secret HM leader and how gw14 started...2 months ago. Nobody gives a fk
-
1 minute ago, Nokia Rokia said:
Sorry to break it to you but war is fun and pixel huggers have no room to decide its not go hide dem pixels let the real players enjoy both sides of the game
No hes right partially. He said some things weren't fun, and thats true...war became stale pretty quick because the mechanics left no room for a comeback attempt.
But he was right for the wrong reasons lol
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:
A+ for creative metaphors :-p. We're all here to have fun. However, I think there were some things about this war that weren't so much fun and I think the crux of it has to do with a "failure to communicate". To this day, there are clearly ways to resolve any outstanding differences as to why the war started, but it seems people would rather hold their grudges then try to figure out which narrative was true, so perhaps that's how things will stay for the forseeable future.
Well there won't be any major wars for at least another 3.5 months so you can kindly sleep easy at night knowing this, instead of thinking a week between threads about the same topic is "long enough"
-
2
-
-
Funny enough, I've known who the HM secret leader has been all of this time but its funny watching phoenyx struggle
-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, Sval said:
At no point was our bank in VM. It was stored in an offshore that remained active and attackable throughout the war.
The head of The Foundation Bank went into VM. But that's not an offshore. And the bank's assets were distributed far and wide before he did so.
No rules were at any time broken.
None. No rules have been broken.OWR had partial bank delete in gw14 because y'all hid your bank in a nation under new nation protection in an offshore. Got ss's to prove it
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Malal said:
But not NPO 🤔
I see how it is, you just love war dodgers and VMers
Fk that, war dodgers and vm'ers dont get my support
Spy Op, eh? [meme]
in Orbis Central
Posted
But the point being since they did a spy intel you can basically say it's none of the competent people that would spy for stat padding, this probably came from someone you pissed off recently