Jump to content

Zed

Members
  • Posts

    293
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Zed

  1. 17 hours ago, Marika said:

    I disagree tbh. Having a trusted offshore is an asset.

    It's just elitism to say you need your own to be good.

     

    Especially in the age of most AA's having like 2 working gov members tops.

     

    4 hours ago, Marika said:

    I don't disagree with your exact point -- If you're not large enough to entertain having your own offshore and you don't have a trusted government team then I highly urge any micro to look into alternative options (mergers, disbandment, protectorates, etc).

     

    The issue I take, and the elitism I call out, is the absolute notion that any given thing defines a competent alliance. There is a metric tonne of gatekeeping in the PnW community surrounding the term "competent" given that this is a text-based browser game. I've said it before and I'll say it again: You can take any given group of active people and turn them into a "competent" alliance through basic organizational skills.

     

    The gatekeeping often leads to suppressed new alliances or random wars against existing alliances for no reason other than perceived competence. Often, these perceptions are warranted but I think it detracts from the game to constantly harp about getting good or outright disbanding -- the political game very clearly suffers from a lack of participation especially outside the top 10. Most people avoid the forums due to toxicity, they avoid places like RON due to toxicity, etc. This community needs to be open to allow for engagement rather than rabidly attacking any perceived weakness in my opinion.

     

    My curmudgeonly opinion is that there should be more actively relevant alliances on the world scene. Micros usually do not contribute to this. Having 2 working gov members tops is, frankly, a sorry state for most relevant alliances. If you do not have a trusted government team, then that is a complete organizational failure.

    You could scoop up a bunch of these micro type alliances, merge them into each other (and that does not have to be all together, you could make a few decent alliances out of that), and be much more able to accomplish that. Sure, we do not have the playerbase now to have thousand or even five-hundred player alliances without resorting to illegally giving away Korean comics, and that is totally fine. But we have smaller blocs and "mid-level" alliances, and that is good. Not everyone is going to play in a Top 10 alliance. That would be a pretty limiting game. We are, however, too big of a game for randos to just gather up five people and try to have an alliance without knowing what they are doing.

    I completely agree that you can taken any given group of active people and turn then into a "competent" alliance through basic organizational skills. The major alliances can and should take interest in this, and I have been involved in those projects before.

     

     

    1 hour ago, Krampus said:

    @Buorhann i understand your point, and to some extent, agree with it, but you have to keep in mind a majority of the 59 alliances offshoring with Borg are micros, who are either pirate alliances who have no reservations about exposing their bank or offshoring with a non-alliance entity, or just micro’s who can’t even take care of themselves let alone offshore, there’s probably a few “businesses” offshoring as well. For such alliances, it might even make sense to offshore with Borg.

    But if an actual major alliance offshores with any foreign entity, as long as they offshore with a non alliance solution, that’s just a certified micro moment. Blaming borg for that, though, is short sighted or even delusional.

     

    First paragraph got me to look through the list of alliances. Accounting for obvious offshores or single-player projects, it is a pretty sad list once you start getting into the triple digits. I wish that could get cleaned up a good bit. And as for micros who cannot take care of it themselves, that goes to my points above.

    Second paragraph is cosigned by yours truly.

     

    • Upvote 1
  2. My guess is that the instant conversational access of Discord has really driven the active player base there. Discord has several advantages over IRC in a rapid online environment. It is much easier to monitor multiple servers and rooms, there are integrated voice options and emojis, and a whole host of other benefits. Most alliances worth any salt require the use of Discord for members (or an alternative, like TKR with Slack). The downside, seemingly, is that because the game “gets played on Discord” as much as it does in the actual site itself, people have more of an incentive to hash everything out there.

    The news servers contribute to this as well. It strikes me as extremely curious that the PnW Discord is not the watercooler for most of the banter and posting among people from different alliances. Instead, on Discord, there are a host of other servers that fill this role. RON is probably the best known example, but radio show servers like Thalmoria and Morf Radio contribute as well. The socialization of people in game does not happen on the official sanctioned channels. Should it? The OWF really used to serve that town square role that is now not even on the PnW Sanctioned Discord so much as it is on a litany of other servers run by individuals. I am not arguing that this is good or bad, but it is not something that contributes to having public discussions on forums.

    Over the holidays I was watching the original Home Alone with some younger (grade school aged) family members. One of them asked me what the strange black box was that the main character was using to watch the TV. It was a VCR. I had to explain to them what VHS was. They just had no idea. In fairness, except for hipsters with fixie bikes and overpriced lattes, most people today are not choosing a vinyl record player over a streaming platform - the same is true for VHS and streaming. I use this as an analogy here too. The people who remember forums and IRC are winding their careers down and leaving, and people who do not remember what this was like are coming. They will use the tools and technologies they are familiar with to drive discourse.

    This is not some boomer yells at cloud judgement on the shift. It is just a part of what is happening with the cultures of this game. We do not have to trawl dozens of individual forums to do embassy politics, which is fine with me. I liked IRC, but I also like Discord and think that is has opened some new avenues for us too (and I use it in my professional life too, so take that Slack fans).

    I will also admit that I personally am fairly elitist about new player micros and the like. I think this has been documented a lot here, and I probably am not changing my opinion that most micros without experienced players really should not do that, and instead join a more established alliance (and there are several acceptable choices) to learn the game for awhile before making their venture. But I also probably would not post in those threads now telling those people to give up the ghost, because I feel it is not worth it. I would rather save my more limited posting energy to other threads, where some actual half-decent politics are happening. I know that runs counter to some of the narrative here about embracing the new, but I suppose there are ways to pick and choose where one expends their efforts.

    • Upvote 3
  3. 8 hours ago, Mayor said:

    Coming from you guys that is rich. Every war tS cries and moans about some little insignificant thing and tries to make a big deal about it before dogpiling and trying to act morally superior. Seriously tho, if there was a time to disband tS and your shitty little slave bloc then that time has long passed. Seeing you people cling to a once great alliance is pathetic and sad. No wonder Partisan left the game, probably was difficult to watch.

     

    Damn, I wish I would have disbanded when I had the chance five years ago. Oh well.

    Maybe one of these days I will know the answer to why there is not a Skynyrd album of just guitar solos/jams, and I will be a free bird.

    • Haha 2
  4. 56 minutes ago, Prefontaine said:

    You know.. I have an old video about Partisan and Roq sneaking out behind TKR's back related to this..
     

     

     

    Nice find. People do love that movie.

    It is unfortunately showing its old age however, as WANA was named the biggest snake in the game.

  5. 4 minutes ago, Divinum said:

    You know, I was thinking of buying up to 3200 infra a few days before the war started. I'm really glad I didn't. Can you imagine the egg on my face if I had done that? I'd be tempted to delete the game, haha.

    I cannot imagine. Who would do such a thing?

    • Haha 1
  6. clock and ball torture is a war activity involving torture of Alex's Game mechanics this may involve directly pain activities such as farming, bloating, and meat shielding

     

    Real talk, the servers did not go down like potatoes this time, so I commend Alex for not subjecting us to further clock and ball torture.

    • Downvote 1
  7. I hope y'all had this conversation over an All-Star Special at 4 in the morning after watching your cook come back from their smoke break early because y'all showed up for whatever reason in the dead of night.

    Also, as others have posted, I fully expect a Waffle House Index to be posted for global events and wars now, please.

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.