-
Posts
216 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by rollo
-
-
I'm concerned that they seemingly made a distinction between open carry & concealed carry. I'm also concerned that they made this ruling half heatedly, knowing that the full court would be likely to overturn it. Especially since emphasizing Open Carry opens the Pandora's box of people carrying rifles and shotguns at the mall (for example). Certainly, the full court could look at that and use it as reason to reject the ruling.
- 1
-
I fully expect the decision to be overturned En Banc. As to whether or not it makes it to the SCOTUS, they have punted on every 2nd Amendment case since Heller thus far. So I am not holding my breath. Still a long way to go here.
- 1
-
Sig P320 Compact - was my carry gun through last summer when I replaced it with a Glock 19. It's got a great grip with perfect texture. The stock night sights are some of the best I've seen out of the box. And it had one of the sweetest triggers and resets I've ever experienced. The trigger that Sig replaced it with is even better. It's probably the pistol I shoot the best with. I also love that it's modular and had some fun changing it over to a Sub Compact & Carry sized configurations.
The Sig P226 Legion or the P226 Elite is probably the one I droll the most over that I don't presently own.- 2
-
is there a pool being run for when the heavy donating nations start whining to Admin about changing the dynamics of VM?
- 1
-
2 hours ago, Lairah said:
I forget their name, I do remember the 22 city nation was Placentica though. Both were in Alpha.
Bummer. No chance we'll find the scoundrel now with Alpha having disappeared like a fart in the wind.
-
10 hours ago, Lairah said:
Nope. When the Nuke Bloc war ended without my knowing it would, i was fighting a 22 city nation, a 23, and a 17, who all started re militarizing instantly. The 17 accepted peace, leaving me to fight the other two, whose only opponents were me, seeing as how everybody else seemed to get word of this coming.
I lost to the 22 city, but beiged the 23, though only barely (on both accounts). I was 7 cities myself at the time.
who was it? i want them burned at the stake.
-
-
2 minutes ago, Apeman said:
Hate only happens when they are trying to divert attention from the truth. Resorting to lines like git gud or why so salty seem like favorites. So why so salty rollo you sexy farker?
if i told you, you wouldn't believe me
-
this thread needs more venom. more vitriol. where's the hate, people?
-
This entire thread..
-
anything Buorhann downvotes is OK by me.
-
12 minutes ago, Augustus Caesar said:
Lets have a great war TGH
May we destroy so many pixels that the game breaks
One can only hope.
- 1
-
whoop that trick, TRF
- 2
- 2
-
why would you need a Protectorate if you have all of those treaties?
-
Wait...is CoS outsourcing FA now? because that would be awesome if it became a thing.
also i'd like to join the angry mob demanding nudes. where do i get my tiki torch?
-
1 hour ago, Justin076 said:
"Sparkplug"
See? You couldn't even get that post out without an immature name call.
Too be frank, I wasn't really trying to debunk your point that a few of your posts aren't completely immature name-calling and ad homs. I was pointing out the fact that you're an incredibly toxic poster who shouldn't have forum access as all you do is ooc name call and use words such as "retarded" and "eat a bag of dicks" instead of offering any bit of insight into any conversation or discussion. You should really grow up and stop with the middle school bullshit.
rollo IC is the same as rollo OOC. And fyi, I happen to be a fantastic god damned human being.
- 1
-
4 minutes ago, Justin076 said:
I think your mom needs to wash your mouth out with some soap.
I'd rather have your mom do it for me.
See if you can follow along, Sparkplug: the implication was that I *never* post anything other than 'ad homs' - I just pulled roughly a dozen (that means 12) examples and I only got to page 2 of my posting history.
Should I elaborate more (Elaborate means "to add details in writing, speaking" when used as a Verb)? Or should I just quit now since you probably won't get it?- 1
-
-
23 hours ago, Buorhann said:
>KillzBob joins Fark
>Fark later removes KillzBob and hits him
>KillzBob later rejoins Fark
>Fark then blames KillzBob for disband info
Shifty, what’s next in this romance comedy of PnW?
>Buorhann is born
>Bourhann is found out to be fantastic
the end.- 2
-
4 hours ago, James II said:
Why are shifty's "predictions" always wrong?
see my 1st post in this thread @James II
- 2
-
frick the EU and everyone in it
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Mad Max said:
I hope you called me a cock sucker, bc I love being told I'm a cock sucker.
Maybe not, being that mine didn't get censored. cocksucker?
Still nope.
idk what you called me but now i'm impressed that it has to be worse than cocksucker.
I have profanity skills level: expert
- 3
-
Just now, Mad Max said:
I identify as a person who doesn't get told to stfu - therefore thats a personal attack. Reported.
I'd be lying if i said i expected more from a !@#$ like you
- 7
-
Just now, Mad Max said:
Shifty says fark 'gon disband - fark calls him a piece of shit.
I'm with shifty.
when i want something out of you, i'll point to my zipper and grunt. until then stfu dick lips.
- 12
Weapons of War ruling
in Firearm Politics
Posted · Edited by rollo
http://www.guns.news/2018-07-24-federal-government-declares-ar-15s-are-not-weapons-of-war.html
Not sure I understand the .50 cal thing. There seems to be a movement in several states to ban it (including here in MA). I've never shot it, myself. So I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm typically against bans in general; especially when you consider that no crime (to my knowledge) was ever committed using a .50 BMG. Another example would be the Bump Stock ban - 1 person uses it with nefarious intentions and they suddenly need to be banned? Anti gunners often ask "why do you NEED an AR15?" "Why do you NEED a bump stock?" "Why do you NEED a .50 cal?"
When you ask why anyone needs something, you're treating a right as a privilege.