Conner Temple
-
Posts
1074 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Conner Temple
-
-
2 hours ago, Buorhann said:
There is nothing wrong with Ground Forces attack. There's nothing to fix.
Who were you before?
A person who didn't understand how to war.
-
15 hours ago, Micchan said:
So the top nations have 40-50 days to spy your nukes and get out of the war range?
Challenge accepted
-
1 hour ago, Hit-Girl said:
I need to admit that this is very progressive idea of not having any gov. Something like anarchy type of alliance. I am glad that Panth made finally very interesting move and I am looking forward to see more alliances to go Panth way with that type of gov. Very interesting how it will work for them in long time.
Good luck Pantheon!
They've finally done something worth their while. Well, it's not really worth anything, I'm just glad that Pantheon are doing SOMETHING.
-
6
-
-
On 10/03/2018 at 7:00 AM, Mad Max said:
You feel fine. Trust me.
I've always trusted you... just maybe not on this.
-
On 09/03/2018 at 11:50 PM, Queen M said:
Are you sick enough to die yet or....?
Sadly not. I've not seen the worst of Stratagem's FA policy. I'll wait and see though
-
1
-
-
On 03/03/2018 at 10:58 PM, Buorhann said:
You're being annoying and make me want to roll you, but I know that would just make you even more annoying.
I support any motion to roll him. I back it up with a reward of a bounty placed on his nation of your specified type: raid, attrition or nuke; that is if you take me up on the offer
-
1
-
-
I'm connected to FB now? I don't know how to feel about that.
-
Ewww. Stratagem....
Ewwwwwwwww. AO
Is this treaty meant to make you feel sick?
-
1
-
-
On 05/03/2018 at 0:25 AM, Dio Brando said:
Sign treaties with people in the same tier as you for defensive power. Your ally consisting of nations in a lower tier can work for countering submarine. If the ally's nations are mostly in a higher tier, down-declares on your alliance can be defended as well. Different tier for offensive power as well (initiative to hit an alliance whose ranks you can't fully reach). But then again... this is Pantheon, not an alliance that is known for beginning wars, xdxd.
Or an alliance known for doing well in war either.
-
2 hours ago, Big Brother said:
Assuming that is true, why does it appear that he's fighting back? If he did indeed consent, he goofed himself. There's no way the cash they get from the bounties is going to cover the costs of the infrastructure damage inflicted. I don't see how this is anything but a loss for him.
He's fighting back because if he doesn't its basically slot filling.
-
On 07/03/2018 at 3:01 PM, Zeebrus said:
1). May the best player win Two, three or four nations compete in a game of Trivia like 20 questions long, each correct answer earns you points, and each incorrect answer loses you points, and maybe if no one can answer it it goes back around, but this time getting it wrong loses slightly more points or something, well anyways, in the end the player with the highest point count will be spared from being nuked while the losers are all nuked once
2). Wheel of Misfortune Contestants who answer a question (or two, maybe even 3 or 4 to prevent a back up with the nukes) spin a wheel with different options, things like maybe ‘Get [amount] of a resource’ ‘Choose a nation to be nuked’ and then smaller ones like ‘Choose a nation to be nuked TWICE’ but also have lots of bad ones to keep it fun, things like ‘Pay the Fraggle rock X million dollars’ and of course the one everyone wants ‘You got nuked!’
3). PnW Celebrity Battles The people of Orbis vote on 3 people (in your war range, ofc) they want to see on the show, those who ditch get nuked instantly of course, and those who show up to it will have to answer 10 questions each, each one wrong earns another nuke on themselves, and once they’ve got 2 wrong they have to maybe spin a wheel or do something to determine a random number above 10 (or 15 if they’re well off), and that number is alliance member placement, and the number it lands on after the leader has two nukes to their name will be the player who is nuked next for each passing wrong question
4). Alliance Fued (I’m not sure if this one would work but I just came up with it, like it, and wanna see if I can make it work) Two alliance’s face off in a battle of answering questions the fastest (or maybe like in family feud have like, questions with multiple answers and have a bunch of players determine the answers, giving each alliance team points as they go along, but I’m having trouble thinking of ways to keep it pnw related but have multiple answers, cause I’m dummmmmmmb, anyways lemme continue). In the end the losing alliance’s leader gets nukes, but they have to choose two of their own members to be nuked with them, and they don’t have to be on the gameshow team
5). Who wants to be a millionaire (yea just gonna steal the name, why not) One player, One fraggle, one large sum of money on the line, get 2 questions wrong and you’ll be nuked, 2 more wrong and another nuke or two, but then you also lose the game. If someone manages to answer all 20 questions they get a big prize, money maybe, maybe some resources or credits, or maybe they can pick a few people to be nuked
I volunteer as tribute! Take me Fraggle, let me feel the warm glow of your nukes.
On 08/03/2018 at 7:07 AM, Epi said:Nuke all the alliances with Nuclear weapons
Starting with Pantheon obvs. Light them up baby!
-
1
-
-
On 05/03/2018 at 7:26 PM, Buorhann said:
It is, if you think about it.
I should try and hunt down the nuke bloc then and join my people....
-
16 hours ago, Joe Baker said:
I already wrote it in the P&W Discord channel but was suggested to put it here as well, so:
The difference between my NET INCOME and my MONETARY NET INCOME Shows $1.771M, which seems totally off. I am producing goods worth more than $13M daily (used ressources already substracted) and I am wondering how exactly the difference of the $1.7M is calculated.
Cost of buying in resources?
-
1 hour ago, LeotheGreat said:
You are the exception, not the rule.
Not true. I'm 300 days younger than you and already have 5 more cities than you have. I think you are the exception, not the other way around.
-
2
-
-
22 hours ago, Spaceman Thrax said:
A spy op, perhaps. Remember spy ops, kids?
I 'member
-
10 hours ago, Lilac Veritas said:
Honestly shout out to ss23 for the hard work behind the scenes, often goes unappreciated
He's the real reason this game is even online!
-
1
-
-
16 hours ago, Redarmy said:
Superplayers: Here some suggestions to fix the eco
Alex: Stong and Stable Leadership
Superplayers: Wut m8?
Alex in a nutshell.
-
Econ and bounties updates are perfect. The war changes, not so much. As others have iterated, use the test server for these 'temporary' changes that you just throw at us without any consultation.
-
19 hours ago, Negan said:
Moved to Spam.
OK, I don't know why. This is a real treaty.
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Mad Max said:
So much trash.
And yet I've not even got -50 rep on this thread. Its a shame on the PnW community.
-
4
-
-
14 hours ago, Seeker said:
The biggest disappoint was that you didn't quit.
Don't be rude.
-
11
-
-
6 minutes ago, Buorhann said:
Did you miss the Lordaeron spam and see where it led to?
Its not at all uncommon lately.
But hey, I got trolled. Thanks @Bezzers for clarification.
You actually believed this? What are you smoking?
9 minutes ago, Epi said:AIM does love ending treaties
, on another note \/ Connor bot broke half way through this thread
I did indeed break
-
12
-
-
Of course that record wont be broken
-
12
-
-
8 minutes ago, Ivan (Uzume) said:
Is this guy trying to beat NoNeckCasey when it comes to downvotes?
Do you want that to happen? I think we all do
-
1
-
18
-
How far we have fallen
in Orbis Central
Posted
*stares intensely across at Kenny*
Do not threaten Holton. I may not like the guy, but you have no right to call him obscene names. I think this calls for a bounty.