James II
-
Posts
1332 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by James II
-
-
Makes sense. The more you have deployed and engaged elsewhere, the less you have at home.
I suppose this is reflected in losses while your troops are on the offensive, but then again it's not like you do a ground attack and then your troops come home same day. Unless it's Grenada. -
1 hour ago, Aether said:
Your roasts are so dry I'd've thought you over salted them.
See Bjorn? I'm not the only one who thinks you need to step up your poop talking game!
-
1
-
-
Congrats guys!
-
2 minutes ago, Breadbeard said:
The attacker in a war should not get beige time for losing. It doesn’t make sense that the attacker gets to have time to rebuild, he/she should accept the risks of engaging in a war.
I'd like to add they still get penalties of losing i.e. infra damage and loot and bank loot. But they should not be protected.
-
3 minutes ago, Leo said:
Alliances are very one-dimensional.
Alliance Challenges could change that. Random challenges that are assigned to each alliance with a goal to achieve by a specific date/time, e.g: Your alliance challenge is to declare X amount of wars today....something along those lines, with achievements/resources as rewards. With challenges changed daily/weekly/monthly depending on the scale of given challenge.There is already an abundance of resources, I don't think adding them will help. The alliances should be user defined not Alex designed, challenges wouldn't accommodate player design and things might get cookie cutter like in idle tap games.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Bjorn Ironside said:
Unless land is made a lot cheaper this would be a bad idea on many fronts, as the RoI on land as it is, is very long, so unless land becomes more important or much cheaper this would be a bad move.
Destroying land makes no sense. You can't destroy land. If a nation is bombed their land doesn't disappear into the ether.
-
2
-
3
-
-
I think before we add more to the game we need to improve server performance. I.e. politics and snore. The game is down 2hrs total (5 min before and after turn change) on a good day.
-
1
-
-
Congrats on peace.
May you find better allies that don't abandon you after getting caught cheating! They were underserving of your unyielding loyalty.
-
3
-
-
Does this mean we cannot expect to see 'pirate wars?'
-
Why is he allowed to cheat? Also DNFJ is a burnt donut, he cannot be trusted.
-
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=182088&display=bank NSFL
Don't click on the link unless your a mod, you'll regret it.
He sold all his stuff and transferred it. He's obviously intending to get deleted so his resources and cash being transferred out is also a rules violation and should be deleted out of the respective banks.-
4
-
-
Didn't DNFJ brag about goons destroying communities when they first popped up?
-
5
-
-
We were fighting each other just fine before. t$ /pre vs Alpha 2
-
2
-
-
Sad to see they would rather destroy their own community then have white peace in a war
-
5 minutes ago, Seeker said:
It is with a heavy heart thatGuardians of the GalaxySeeker has voted on disbanding as an alliance. Some members will leave, some members may stay but we are Groot forever.
The whirlwind is coming.FIFY
-
1
-
-
This is the most thorough explanation of a ban I've seen. Kudos to Alex for defending his position, even though if you read the document it's more than enough. Most admins say "I AM GOD BAN!"
-
1
-
1
-
-
Welcome to the fight! And welcome to Orbis!
-
Why not have a system that's a gamble. Games are automated but you manage the team and their tactics. Have a 'baseball season' a point cap system so you have to strategically pick you players and what they're good at, and a pay out system based on how far your team gets. peopel could still play baseball, it would be more fun since you'd have to actually think instead of just spam investment. And you completely eliminate any botting
-
28 minutes ago, brucemna said:
Wait by prefonteens words I beleive or it could of been someone else in ur said said no and walked away. If I was not out amd about I would look for that. My total understanding is ur side was presented the reps and yes told they a hard numbers but apperently walked away and made a low offer back which yes was rejected.... that post I remember responding back to as many others have as well.
We were told we could not make any counter offers. You are correct to say we attempted to negotiate, and you are correct when you say that IQ leadership was unwilling to budge from their terms as they said it was "non-negotiable" and "hard numbers"
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, brucemna said:
James I am not concerned about u at all. Funny though maybe a couple of hours or a post from late last night from someone in coalition A has said negotiations are going on but yes it may take time but that is understandable. Trust me on this one though I am sure ur jibberish is not helping. Constantly telling our side our leaders are lying to us does not go well. Yes I would assume our side is standing pat on a few things whether it be money or whatever but I am sure there is prob a way that there is wiggle room which I am sure prefo knows are others that r doing ur negotiation for u. To make one thing clear for u. Us plain folk on our side we r in know hurry to hane peace period. If it comes it comes if it takes another month or too we are olay with that. At least most of NPO members that I know are long term and we r use to long stuff .. well just cause we are NPO period. We have gone through many wars that have gone on for long periods of time and take alot of guff about our leaders. So ur standing and calling us liars or whatever ur term for the day is well in all honesty we laugh. So have a great day and maybe just maybe have the kiddie nap that all defensive kids need after telling mommy the so called bully lied or hit u.
And I stood along side NPO for all of that. I understand your leaders don't want their gross misconduct to be brought to light. They have used their dominance over us to try and bully us out of sharing heinous OOC attacks and their unwillingness to negotiate. I'm not calling you a liar, I'm calling the people who told you the reps were 'negotiable' a liar. They have been stalling talks since day one. I literally offered roq peace on day one, he rejected. and we've offered peace since. Every rejection has been on your end.
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, brucemna said:
Maybe cause then u spent to much time here looking for sympathy and crying all the time. As well if I recall I have not seen here hard numbers as a matter of fact I have seen where some have mentioned they may have been negotiable.
We tried negotiating, they verbatim said it was non-negotiable. I understand your overlords lie to you, and you believe their lying, but that does not make what you think fact! Thank you for your concern!
-
2
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Just now, hope said:All mid-to-low tier alliances on your side have been smashed (Immortals has like 20% planes) so I’m not really sure what your point is lmao
and im not involved with peace talks so no comment
All I'm saying is IQ has been dropped below 50% planes! The rest is up for your interpretation! Thank you for your concern!
-
7
-
2
-
Just now, brucemna said:
Umm I am thinking it has been stated that terms and all were given ... seems certain people walked away without possibly wanting to negotiate so maybe it is them on urside u should be kicking in the ass to get back and actually NEGOTIATE and stop running back to mommy (ORBIS forums) and crying the other kids are not playing fair
It would seem your thinking is wrong! We tried to negotiate and were told the monetary terms were non-negotiable and that the numbers set were hard set! Thank you for your concern!
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, hope said:
If you’re winning then you can’t also be waiting for Coalition B to give you your terms of surrender
I merely pointed out that we've dropped IQ below 50% planes! The rest is up for your interpretation!
As for peace/(or) surrender, we would still very much like it if IQ leaders would allow the peace process to happen! Thank you for your concern!-
1
-
Dynamic Defensive Slots
in Game Suggestions
Posted
I expect raiders to be upset because it counters their ability to be as effective, especially towards balancing down declares. I've noticed that's the only group protesting here.