LordRahl2
-
Posts
2953 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by LordRahl2
-
-
I'm going to assume that LordRahl2 having been running scared for a long time has finally managed to get the high energy Trump SUPERthread closed. Just another victory for the Roz if he requires such things, I LOVE IT MAGGLE!
This'll go great I'm sure and I look forward to the post election period where I will if God blesses his last gift on this Earth, the Roz, be able to continue posting.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Nice try Roz! I noticed that you let that thread languish.
-
sa
-
sa
-
The August-September '16 War.
-
Look forward to seeing how this works out.
-
2
-
-
Does he have proof it was folks with Hillary or Dems, or was it a sick and twisted idea by his own folks to gather sympathy votes as he tries to blame the other side, or was it the person/company who owns the office looking for an insurance payout and trying to cast the blame on anyone else but them?
Proof? The emporer said so. No further proof is required.
-
I feel as if this thread is slightly off topic
Strangely for the internet...it is very much on topic.
-
-
sa
-
How then would you explain the current double standards pushed by the media and society as a whole? The fact that you deny such a thing means that you are probably living in your own ignorant little bubble.
Edit: Not many men started beating their women outright for no reason. If a woman starts going hysterical and slapping and kicking like a mule, a good slap to the face can wake them up. Additionally if a woman is with another man aside from their husband and acting like a !@#$, you cannot blame the man for having a violent response to this. The "no violence against women under any circumstances" just shows the double standard and how people want to escape any consequence of their actions.
The double standard pushed by society...is what? If men or women commit domestic abuse they face and generally recieve the same punishment. The fact that more men than women do so might say something about how subgroups raise boys. The fact that you cannot see such a thing probably living in your own ignorant little bubble.
As to the rest: No. Just no. It is never right for a spouse to attack their partner. No "a good slap to the face does not wake them up"...I can absolutely blame a man or woman for having a violent reaction to a problem. Looks like YOU have the double standard here.
Your level of shit posting keeps going up. I am sorry for your lot in life that you have to use violence to deal with problems when your female companion sleeps around on you.
-
1
-
-
The "equality" of society says that women are free to hit men but the moment a man hits a woman it is "muh oppression". Do you support this logic or lack thereof? Either you don't or you in fact would be addressing that man and woman are different. In which case, you could very well be considered a sexist.
The "equality" of society says nothing of the kind.
Logic fail elsewhere.
-
1
-
-
Those were the good old days weren't they? Now, males are beaten by their wives and found groveling at their feet. At least the beta ones like yourself; the ones who shouldn't even be considered men. I mean..who doesn't like beating women?!?
Right! Except my wife doesn't do that. Sadly we talk.
I am sure our relationship would be enhanced with a little good old fashioned physical violence.
/////////
In all seriousness your reply is emblematic of your whole alt-right movement's logic.
To you: If men stop beating wives then you believe that women will start beating men. Homosexual marriage? -then young women will be raped and probably dogs too.
You should summon bubblegum to provide the logical proof showing that stopping domestic violence leads to fluffy getting raped.
-
1
-
-
as
-
sa
-
You say modern; I say degenerate. Who is to say that more "modern" means better? This myth of progress needs to seriously stop.
Totally. We need to go back to the good old days where we could beat women (as long as the stick was appropriately sized).
You degenerates need to learn that the past was where it was at.
-
after this I shall be ignoring you
This is the way of the Roz. Cannot stand up for his opinions, as they are indefensible, instead creates his own safe space so that his precious opinions cannot be challenged.
-
1
-
-
as
-
sa
-
I'd ask where this racist thing comes from but considering I first ran into it with Spite (well on this forum anyway) I'm all too aware that holding certain stances automatically means I'm a racist so thats that. I'm actually a nationalist who finds America's obsession with race and the pushing of terms like "African-American" to be disgusting, but no, I oppose certain things so I must support the BNP (whose stance is no non-white person can be British) and be a massive racist as Spite has accused me several times (among other nonsense).
Calling you racist comes from you being openly and repentantly racist in these forums. It comes from reading your words not from generally disagreeing with you. I have shown you your blatant racism over and over again.
That you can honestly claim that a contender for the presidency of the United States and a rap artist are equivalent is laughable.
-
They didn't vote for CG, so I'm all in.
MRGA!
MRGA!
-
A toast to peace:
-
1
-
-
Somebody, please teach Rozalia the difference between rape and consensual sex.
I think we would need to teach Roz that human mammals who are not low melanin heterosexual things with testicles are also actually people.
Consensual sex vs rape will be a lesson after we define "others" as "people".
-
1
-
-
This is a liberal dream. Fortunately, I no longer need to engage disillusioned Roz on any of this as he has effectively lost already.
So. Hey Roz:
I heard the info wars guy was planning on leaving the country. Where will he go and when?
-
Honestly, I would rather that you folks were willing to engage in actual debate. I understand why you are not - but still.
As
in Forum Games & Spam
Posted
sa