Jump to content

Dalinar

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    574

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Dalinar

    • Popular Post
    • Popular Post

    The Fury of the Gods Descends!

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    Yep, two alliances already knee-deep in war on other fronts. It doesn't require "genius status" to comprehend that action is, in fact, called bandwagoning. But to save Pantheon's pixels in the long term I totally get the move :P

    The coalition worked with Fist/Pantheon to determine where they would go, it's not bandwagoning when they coordinated with us and did all that was asked of them and more. They have already made a difference in this war and put their pixels on the line in doing so.

    • Upvote 9

    Limit Nuclear "Stockpiling" + Buff Vital Defense System (Balance)

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    Nukes could be changed sure, but limiting them is not the way to go. If NK or Seabass want to spend the resources and time buying a huge number of nukes so they can maximize damage, it should be hard to take them down. Seabass has been stockpiling for 83 days at least, his nuke stockpile will be diminished far quicker than that due to firing them off/some being spied away, and that's ok imo. 

    • Upvote 1

    The Light in the Sky Accords

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    What he is saying is alliances can ally those who they become close with and would like to publicly recognize their close bond, not only ally those who would be convenient to have allied during a war

     

    lrn2read m8

    Insert Name Here was saying TLF is on one side/BoC on the other, he posted "belongs to the other side", which could be read in a couple of different ways: 1) BoC is a member of the other side 2) BoC is owned by the other side. 

     

    Knowing Insert Name Here, he meant the first option. Steve assumed he meant option #2 (or he took the ambiguous wording to take a shot idk). Dylan read it as #1 as well (he was objecting to Steve's interpretation of the post, not what Steve was saying).

    • Upvote 3

    Declaration of War

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    tbh let's cut the bullshit here.

     

    You wanted to fight in a war, tkr has gotten cocky. You believe you're the best in the game at the moment in terms of war(not top 5 though). You wanted to fight someone, which is why instead of trying diplomacy, you just attacked. Which is why instead of talking to some of our mutual friends about talking to us about the raids, you just attacked.

     

    Enjoy your war, beating us means nothing. We've come back from worse and we'll come back again. We're a family and we don't abandon each other. Arrgh are our brothers and we will always have their back.

    I'll admit some of my members have gotten cocky (it's something I've been trying to hammer home to them that they aren't hot shit). We aren't top 5 in terms of military, we're likely somewhere in the top 10 range. 

    • Upvote 4

    Brown Pants Agency Surrender Treaty

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    No it's the not the treasures. But the penalties should the treasures not be received in time. 100m isn't something you can make overnight. Plus outright embarrassing them. That's pushing it. In my opinion. Y'all have yours, I have mine and I disagree with your methods.

    Depends on how high your taxes are :v

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.

  I accept