Jump to content

Yosodog

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    927

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Yosodog

    • Popular Post
    • Popular Post

    War Rumors

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    Whatever happens, I know I'm going to instinctively hit NPO. This new treaty web blows by the way. Good job everyone smh. I still love me some tS and TKR.

    • Upvote 8

    Seven Kingdoms Declaration of War

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    This game is dying for multiple reasons:

    1. There's a lack of proper seriousness. You can have fun and be serious at the same time, but you can't have all of one and not the other.

    2. There's a lack of looking before you leap. Jumping to conclusions before actually talking to people creates more problems.

    3. Broken game mechanics that haven't been fixed in more than a year. (We can't do much about it apparently despite our hundreds of ideas).

    4. The OWF is so cancerous that almost no one really cares about it. (It used to be a decent place where you could have a civilized argument without flame and meme wars)

    5. Stubborn leaders don't seem to realize they're the cause of all their own alliance issues because they're too caught up in the idealism that they're the only one that is right. (Not to mention they don't accept their faults even when they know it is)

    6.  There's more that I'm sure you can list.

     

     

    l0K4fIEZ1FFiWFJPq.gif

    • Upvote 2

    API Discussion

    in Game Discussion

    Posted · Edited by Yosodog

    Did a couple of API things:

     

    Added an API for singular wars. URL is here: https://politicsandwar.com/api/war/WARIDHERE

    You can find the ID for a war on most war-related page URLs, easiest is to look at a timeline or from the Wars API.

     

    Added an API for alliance applicants. URL is here: https://politicsandwar.com/applicants/ALLIANCEIDHERE

    This will return false if the alliance doesn't exist, or there are no applicants. Otherwise it will return true with a list of nations.

     

    Added city count to the nations API.

     

    Fixed some variable misinterpretation to remove quotes from integer values in a few places. Should make things (very, very slightly) faster to load

     

    I think your applicant API is wrong. Seems it's https://politicsandwar.com/api/applicants/AID

     

    oh god I'm in love with you. Is there any way to get damages on the war API?

    A Statement On Recent Events

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted · Edited by Yosodog

    FINE, for !@#$ sake. I'll bite. It's not like I was trying to get through the amazing sequel of Anal Whores so I'll keep it short.

     

    If I understand your question Keegoz, you're insinuating that because one of the reasons we dropped Obelisk is because of their treaty with Polaris means that we aren't trying to mend wounds with tC and NPO, right? Hopefully it is because I'll attempt to answer your question.

     

    In my expert opinion, BK and NPO have made decent strides towards mending our relationship. We'll never be best buddies or even friends at that, but I think our relationship has moved in a positive directing since the conclusion of the Silent War. NPO makes an effort to talk to us and throughout last war, Roq was on our forums continually keeping open communications with us and we respect that and I think it has had a positive effect. However, I cannot say the same for Polaris, or any other alliance you want to throw under this umbrella. Polaris has made absolutely no effort, in my opinion, to attempt to mend the wounds of our relationship. Of course, we haven't either, but uh... :thatisnotmyjob.gif: So it's quite clear that BK is willing to move forward with the relationships with all of those alliances and we are in fact moving forward with our relationship with NPO.

     

    Now, it came to quite a surprise that the Obelisk Government thought it would be a remotely good idea to sign a treaty with an alliance that attacked us just a few months ago without more than a day's notice. This just screams incompetence at its finest. Now, we don't expect Obelisk to ask for our approval, but we do however expect the courtesy of being asked our thoughts on the matter and not a "Hey, we're signing this tomorrow." Especially considering that Polaris is in the complete opposite sphere and was our enemy in the previous major war, I don't see how this didn't cross their mind a little more in advance.

     

    I'm going off on a tangent so let me bring it back to your original question, Keegoz. We are willing to make amends with our previous 'enemies' and we are currently working on it with NPO. However, Polaris hasn't shown any effort into doing so. 

     

    We also want to make sure that we can always be there for our allies and that our allies can always be there for us. We learned some hard lessons from our treaty with UPN. We do not want ties to alliances in completely polar spheres from us. This treaty would've been a clear argument for paperless because it would cluster the !@#$ out of the treaty web. 

     

    When Obelisk signed this treaty without any regard to us, it was clear the direction that Obelisk wanted to take. After Curu spoke to all parties involved and got a clear picture of the situation, we held an unofficial Government vote, and it was unanimous to drop Obelisk. We wish them the best in their future endeavors, but those endeavors will have to be without us.

     

    I personally find dropping the treaty now and making our intentions clear is better than just using Obelisk as a chess piece in any future conflicts. Hopefully I answered your question Keegoz. I can't say that if you have any future questions I won't just shitpost but you can give it a shot.

    • Upvote 2

    War is Chaos

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    Except I'm not. If anything, at least I'll have more people in range after this war. Please stop bringing up same thing every single war. Plus a nation with 5k infra per city is getting rolled by my alliance, something we've wanted to do for a looong time:)

     

    But Jaguar, why are you so mad that allies are honoring their agreements? You just seem a tad angry that it's finally TEst getting rolled.

    • Upvote 1
    • Popular Post
    • Popular Post

    War is Chaos

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    They thought they were in initial blitz. Now that things got easier, they can stop pretending to be religious.

     

    Jaguar, listen buddy, you don't have to be angry. Just let your pixels go. You can only be a pixel hugger for so long.

    • Upvote 9

    Non-Gender Neutral War Notification

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted · Edited by Yosodog

    0a16338d4a0079bff5fa21afaad8729b.png

     

    "'His' reason..'?

     

    How do I know Greatnate is a male? What if he identifies has a Delphigender or a Ungender?

     

    I demand this is changed to a more gender neutral word. It is good in the war timeline, but it displays 'his' on the notifications. I can't believe that in {{ \Carbon\Carbon::now()->year }} we still have to fight for something like this. Shame on you Alex for assuming Greatnate's gender.

    • Upvote 6
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.

  I accept