Jaime Lannister
-
Posts
172 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Jaime Lannister
-
-
That title. Are you planning on body swapping with each others alliances? Thats what I'd call closeness.
-
You could start something yourself if you are that impatient. Be proactive!
-
I can't read this.
Then we have succeeded in making a proper scroll.
Glad to see this up.
-
Clearly you need another treaty partner to bring Kill la Kill in for a theme as well.
-
1
-
-
The amount you try to blame your shortcomings on me is hilarious. You guys got attacked, asked for help, we said we'd help, then when half your sphere didn't militerize and we backed out(mind you, we had 30k score, you decide to just dump everything on me/Lordaeron.
*Multiple Leaks from our chatrooms* "Kylo Leaked!
*Failure to protect our allies that we had MD level treaties with* "Lordaeron has an ODP, but we'll say Lordaeron backing out is the reason we couldn't defend our MD level allies"
*Yeah, accepting that peace made us look weak* "Kylo urged us to do it, even though we're our own sovereign alliance, let's just tell people Kylo urging us to accept peace is the reason we accepted it"
Stop trying to put your shortcomings on us, it's your alliance and it was your sphere. You guys decided to accept peace. You guys had leakers from your channel that wasn't Lordaeron, and you guys were unable to defend your allies. The fact that you keep having excuses for literally everything shows everyone exactly how inept you guys really are. If you spent as much effort on FA as you did Bullshitting then GoT sphere would still be around.
I think you give yourself too much credit in how much we stay up thinking about you I got to say.
-
dishonest is an interesting choice of words. why do you feel the current sk criticism is dishonest?
When I see people complaining that we are not having a "fair" fight I can't help but roll my eyes considering the history of conflicts in this game. Like in (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways) before it people don't go for anything that is "fair" much of the time and the same people who are complaining here themselves are guilty of what they are accusing us of here now, Test included. Same with the Valyria situation, they themselves have no issue with what occurred, we really were planning on jumping in yet still we "betrayed them" or some nonsense.
People can criticize us of things like our foreign policy and how well we prepare and do in fights, such is reasonable toward any alliance even if I may not agree with the conclusions. The above though is simply pathetic and its hypocritical on the face of it.
Along with Obelisk, you will be flattened come February.
Well at least you are open about your desires.
-
I find this sudden outbreak of "fair fights" and "what's the point in fighting, you can't keep someone down forever" to be rather absurd. I know there are those out there who have this real hate boner for SK but really now can't you try and and relieve your pain in a less dishonest way?
-
I suppose when the media and Clinton supporters push the "Trump is literally Hitler" narrative there being violence when he actually wins was inevitable.
-
1
-
-
Good fight all, its been a blast. Couple of my opponents even cool enough to chat even while we blew each other up. Well, time to sort through the rubble, let the rebuilding begin!
-
I'll break open a cask of wine and toast your merger. To bigger and better things, stronger together!
-
1
-
-
The likely-hood of being caught is relatively low fwiw.
Well anyone who thinks its worth the risk can give it a go, I have to wonder if the chance of getting caught (which will have to happen at some point, can't see the vast majority of people agreeing to this arbitrary limit after all and the spy odds can't be that much in favor of the initiator) it could easily set off the very event the Gentlemen want to prevent.
-
Seems to me that if one's nukes are being targeted by spies the proper response is to detonate them over the cities of the spying nation.
-
3
-
-
I agree with you on the cover bit certainly.
Remove their white knights from the equation and bring down the ridiculous multiculturalism and we'll be golden I'm confident. It's certainly true a lot of Muslims hold very nasty views but thats because they can safely hold them due to their white knights. Take their protection away and the Conservative Muslims will quickly lose power as other Muslims either simply become (well reveal themselves really) more liberal or leave the faith outright, something most are not quite able to do right now. I've tried to raise the plight of apostates up here several times but people like Spite surprise surprise immediately come in to defend Muslims which is how it goes in RL too. When the faith is allowed to bleed in numbers heavily (and it would if the white knights didn't protect it) those left will have to try and modernise to survive and they and those who have left the faith will integrate into the nationalities of the country at last.
I can agree with this, if Muslims were held to the same standards as everyone else than they wouldn't be able to maintain such beliefs as modern law wouldn't allow it and without their regressive left defenders this would be much easier. Would certainly be a boon for Muslims themselves who will be able to assimilate into mainstream culture without such strong backlash from within their own insular community. I'm not sure if regressives will be sent into retreat anytime soon though, if anything they are growing stronger especially in universities. I think it will take a few more tragedies to occur before the people finally stir and kick these types out of power without concern of being called a bigot. Hopefully.
-
1
-
-
Heh, I think Paul Joseph Watson is pushing this into the mainstream media all on his own.
-
WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU IDIOTS HOW WOULD TRUMP BE A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN ANYONE ELSE ON THIS LIST.
@$#@/ IDIOTS.
As opposed to Hillary Clinton? No thank you. Voted preference for Gary Johnson when I could in these polls but when against Clinton or Stein? Trump it is.
-
I actually disagree with this. It's true there are Muslim hustlers who play up the "we're very offended over minor things" bit, however they'd be utterly irrelevant if the Regressives/Liberals/so forth didn't throw a fit every time a tiny bit of criticism goes towards Muslims. So I'd say it's the regressives who are thin skinned and some of the nastier Muslims take advantage. Take them out of the equation and I'm sure we'd find Muslims perfectly reasonable and those in the west would quickly start moving to a far more liberal stance on things as Conservative Muslims will no longer have their white knights to protect them.
Well I don't really think its Muslims themselves who use this ridiculous line for the most part no. It is the regressive left who spouts this nonsense for the most part, got to use this line of reasoning as a way to censor those who would criticize Islam. Regressives need to reflexively protect anyone outside of the cis white male category after all so of course Muslims will fall under the "dindu nuffin" in all circumstances. I actually see them as a sort of vanguard of the Muslims, they give the actions of the Islamists and terrorists cover by decrying everything that comes even close to criticism as "islamophobic". I'm less optimistic about the Muslims themselves though, rather frightening numbers support suicide bombing, Sharia law, outlawing homosexuality, subjugating women etc. Not just Muslims in Pakistan either but British Muslims. I do not have much confidence in assimilation especially with the insane European idea of multiculturalism. Not a coincidence that rapes and all other crimes are going up in the past couple years. Of course that brings us back to the regressives giving them cover by actually covering up their crimes out of fear of sparking bigotry. As an American it makes me rather relieved that I'm away from this insanity... at least for now.
Maybe not directly relevant but I need an excuse to post this so here
-
2
-
-
Ok I'll address your point directly. I do not think that closing the borders to Muslims will reduce the chances of terrorism in the UK. It will decrease the chances of a terrorist entering the UK.
However, as stated the risk of antagonising almost 3 million citizens by treating them as potential terrorists far outweighs any benefit from blocking new immigration.
With regard to your point that they must be radical anyway if they would become Islamists following a border closure, this is not true. A case in point would be Irish terrorism. In the UK we Had IRA terror attacks for decades and many more people were killed than in all the Muslim attacks together. After the good Friday agreement this mostly stopped. I'm sure you wouldn't suggest we should close the borders to the Irish in case they suddenly radicalise and start blowing stuff up again. The fact is that when you isolate and attack a group, whichever group that is, you create a situation where violent rebellion is more likely. That is true whether the group are Muslim shop workers at Tesco, Irish dock workers, or whatever group you care to name.
I find it rather disturbing every time I see an argument that if you make Muslims mad then some will try to kill you. Doesn't make me feel that safe at all if "criticizing Islam or Muslims" causes terrorism. The problem isn't with the criticism but the thin skinned nature of the criticized.
-
1
-
-
Massive derailment and all that. Thanks mate.
I found the footage of the confrontation to be so fascinating and it gave meat for a few channels I subscribe to on youtube to sink their teeth into. Happy to find it mentioned outside that circle. Thought that maybe TYT has gone so far into the toilet no one even knew about it
-
Regressive leftists are authoritarians who want to install a 1984 style dystopia to make sure everyone is "equal" and no one is "offended"... except for straight white men who will become the new underclass. Contradictory but as we have "privilege" and are "oppressors" so we must pay for past crimes and be lesser than all "marginalized groups".
Scary when I think about it, Trigglypuff shown in a post above is only the tip of a very large iceburg.
-
2
-
-
I'm rather surprised there is any room for debate here, 11 pages worth? Alex Jones did in fact trigger Cenk and Ana after all and they completely lost it. Whatever anyone feels about Jones or TYT the video speaks for itself.
-
Quite a lot of salt in this thread, anyone bring any tequila so we can put it to good use?
-
The guy amuses me what can i say?
-
1
-
-
I just think that when Caesar and the other apes take over after our dieoff they will have one more reason to hate us... scary.
-
I suppose after Obama's stupid speech defending his refusal to use "Islamic extremism" now he will go after anyone who will use it themselves or try to say that it exists. People better beware they don't express their wrongthink or they might be in trouble.
Though I never thought such a thing might happen here, thought covering up Muslim crime stories was a European problem...
-
2
-
Seven Kingdoms Recognition of War
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
Hope you don't mind if we make a bit of a mess while visiting you.