Jump to content

KiWilliam

Members
  • Posts

    256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by KiWilliam

  1. Could we get ruler names added to banking ledgers then? Right now you could send something with the alliance bank using the leader name but it's only displayed with the Nation name under "receiver".

    Truthfully I'd rather it only be one; so if you're going to use ruler names, it should only display the ruler name in the ledger. But if we have to compromise it should at least display the information you're using.

  2. On 6/27/2022 at 7:50 PM, Malakai said:

    While I realize its not your fault, I want to iterate that this one is moronic. Realistically, it needs to be based on something static that can't be used by someone else or changed. We need to change it to nation ID and Alliance ID for bank to bank.

    Also could we get an exact heads up for important changes like this?
    Confusing people (or messing up their automation) because something is changed overnight and then causing a headache is silly.

  3. 49 minutes ago, Linky said:

    Takes time to find one in advance

    An alliance that needs a prot right away (not needed if you're all under c10 or much material help) that doesn't plan in advance isn't likely heading for success.

    • Upvote 1
  4. 18 minutes ago, Prefontaine said:

    It’s a non-choice, the illusion of choice. VDS is far more beneficial than the fallout shelter, if you force someone to chose between them there’s no actual choice to make. 
     

    More in line to an actual choice would be being allowed to have just an iron dome or VDS. 

    Don't we allow players to make dumb choices all the time when people buy credits with irl cash only to buy up to 3000 infra at city 7?

  5. 11 hours ago, Han Solo said:

    Well Legion and TCW saw the importance of including all high gov on their post.  Good on them for including their whole gov and showing them respect

    We included High gov, and sober gov actually. I do not partake myself. We did leave off all our lower gov and staff roles however. They're a bunch of drunks.

  6. Is forum activity directly proportional to the value of one's opinion? I could attempt to encourage more BR people at least for my part into posting lengthy posts, but there's not only a power dynamics issue, but legacy, and simple apathy.

    And I for one encourage it. I hate these political spheres we have and backroom politics. Hopefully everyone starts wearing their red & blue ribbons and we can all yell at the other team on the forums while signing our Declaration of Neutrality.

     

    I for one trust Quack in this thread.

    • Haha 1
  7. In before someone says you can disable baseball

    [spoiler]by the way, you can disable your entire baseball team[/spoiler].

    But for so many reasons, if we can't get something smarter for notifications (for example grouping trade sales together so you just have a summary of how much was bought at your PPU and how much you made vs. having the same boiler plate a dozen times when some noobs need 17 food x 5) just being able to filter out notifications would be nice.

    If we could also have a number for pending trade offers (to/from your nation) or market offers you have outstanding, as a number just like you would for PMs or notifications that would be nice too, even if only partially related to this suggestion.

  8. 15 minutes ago, Kevanovia said:

    So basically you’re doing a temporary MDP to defend yourself against Clock? Isn’t this what MINC and Oasis did and got s*** on for it?

    I was too slow to post this.
    Damn you Kev.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 4
  9. It's a pipe dream, but I would love for the price floor to be based off of other metrics in the game; a multiplier of the average daily revenue of the color sphere in question (for the treasure, and for treasures that can spawn anywhere, use the game's DNR).

    Just a pipe dream, I know it wouldn't happen, so I won't bother drolling out how to make this work realistically. Do not at me.

  10. I doubt this would happen anyway, so consider this a throw away comment (spoiler all my posts fall under this category)

    It would be interesting if you could only buy it if you're in the top % of loot. So if you raided 5b and that's the top 1% you can purchase it, but if you retire and everyone passes you by so now you're only top 5% you wouldn't be able to buy it if you destroy it. Ideally it would be a % of all money looted ever, so even as time goes on and people quit or join the game, it's more possible to get into that tier, but both of these are pipe dreams, so don't tell me how impossible that is to code.

    And as always; if it's not tested on a test server that *works* first, I'm not interested. Thank you for caring enough about my opinion to read my post. And thank *you* for making a suggestion.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.