Jump to content

gerry oldsworth III

Members
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gerry oldsworth III

  1. 8 hours ago, Canbec said:

    I wonder how on Earth you didn't understand my meme was a response to this very meme of yours, when you even reference this meme in your DoE...

    7sng18.png

     

    (all fun and games btw)

    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 1
  2. 3 hours ago, Aria Serielye said:

    Why does everyone want city score lowered?

    All it does is allow people to punch down.... Significantly.
    C25 hitting C11s/C12s...

    Oh... Maybe the big alliances like punching smaller people..

    75 is a sweet spot where it's pretty much balanced, speaking as a c28 who had to shed almost all my infra and buy money off the market to compensate for the amount i lose because of my low infra. (and most of us just want to see this whole matter dropped cause almost every update the mod team wants to change that modifier and it never fixes any of the underlying issues)

  3. 11 minutes ago, Nergia said:

    Go pay for my damages, 180million for 253 million in damages. For someone who brags about making 200m every day, it's amazing that you got 253 million dollars in free damages, and act like I'm "over estimating" I'm just one person. How many raiders do you have again? 10? 20? maybe even 30 members are in your alliance? That's already 6 billion in damages that YOU DO NOT PAY. Why are you justifying this? You got free damages to your enemies, while you don't pay a dime.

    Please stop justifying about "contribution" because go pay for my damages and then talk about "contribution" No alliance in the game will just go to war and make their members lose 200m each, while dealing 300m AND PAY CRAP.

    You're the only alliance that ISN'T A RAIDING ALLIANCE that does NOT PAY WAR REBUILDS. So we needa stop justifying anything. Like it's never your alliance's fault. We don't pay 5/5 just to get into your god damn wars and losing 200m when you can just NOT BE IN AN ALLIANCE and maybe lose 10-20m once in a little while.

    I think maybe you're misunderstanding what your alliance is? It's a predatory alliance that makes other alliances and steals money from members who are inactive for more than a day. Out of any alliance, you guys brag about having 100% win rates against small alliances like The Legion.

    Imagine losing against one alliance despite having TKR as your ally. It's sad that in a 1v3 situation, y'all managed to lose your goddamn wars against Eclipse. Finally fighting against bigger alliances huh?

    Oh yeah! I forgot to mention. After I did all that damage, I also got kicked afterward! :)

    @His Holy DecagonThis is despicable, now that I think back you didn't pay me back my taxes either! #CancelDeca

    • Haha 1
  4. It could be like taxes, the alliance takes a certain percent of the nations military. Then the nation cant access it so that it forces alliances to be more cohesive and act quicker.

    imo you shouldn't put a limit on the amount you can send or the time that you can send them so that we can have huge proxy wars start between two tiny nations with like 1mil troops (but still require the nations to foot most of the bill for these troops or make a limit where it costs more to keep them). This would also add an element to the early parts of wars where an alliance can stockpile troops to counter a blitz.

    Then you could put a troop trading system, where large nations could sell their military on the market for a quick buck. Or alliances could support eachother in proxy wars through massive trades like the trade system we have now (like the rss trade but with soldiers, imagine the amount of meta gaming and stuff we could do with that).
    (and allow alliances to send these troops to anyone willing to accept the trade for them)
    And even if you've sold your troops on a lease you still have them taking up your capacity. 

    And instead of the troops being stored in an alliance bank sort of thing, they could be stored in a nation where the alliance chooses to send them (where that nation could not send them out if blockaded). 

    sorry if none of this makes any sense, I'm really really tired

    • Upvote 4
  5. 20 hours ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:

    I would love to see somebody put together a power rankings instead of a tier list, and every week or two move alliances up and down the list in terms of perceived political power.

     

    your wish has been granted, however the hegemon johnsons will not take lightly to your assumption that this list will ever move.
    my-image.thumb.png.b93d683736a415b5905dec9f8016cef9.png

    • Haha 2
    • Upvote 4
  6. 2 hours ago, Vice said:

    Kev joins a bloc, and usually 1-2 months later that bloc starts a war. It’s happened three times in a row now. 
     

    This man must be stopped. 

    But this doesnt really count as a war right? like out of all the dogpiles we've seen over the last 2 years this HAS to be the worst one. 
    My heart goes out to all those in HM who have to deal with such tyrannical opponents

    #StopJohnsonsHegemony 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.