Jump to content

Wendell

Members
  • Posts

    883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Wendell

  1. I don't keep up with politics in this game and mind my own business but I thought this was funny. After taking 21 nukes to a 35 city nation, I now am extremely concerned about several hundred tanks....needless to say all 4 of his little spies died due to unforseen circumstances.

     

    Screenshot_20240121_095731_Chrome.jpg

    • Haha 1
  2. On 10/16/2023 at 9:54 PM, darkblade said:

    But I would argue that the lack of content hurts the retention rate of the player base and makes it contingent on the community or their alliance. What Alex needs to do is add more content that gives players a reason to be more active in the game and reward them for it. Perhaps even content focused around alliance members working together.

    There are enough players that creates content in their alliances and servers. I think we are placing to much of this responsibility on Alex. 

    The game is normally lackluster during peace. That's a natural part of the game. There is alot of stuff happening in this game. 

  3. While I do agree longer peace is needed instead of constant warfare (especially in 30 day intervals) , I don't believe war should be removed from the game. It is something that balances the slow politics that takes years to achieve any progress sometimes. Wars are fast and decisive like it should be. 

    I can agree with the CBs being very shallow. There needs to be a bit more content, behind the scenes, of creating a reason to war. Not just "oh we happen to be in a different sphere let's fight". There was a period in this where wars happened for a real reason like a political grudge, groups of nations not honoring their treaties, secret treaties, poaching, debt owed, or even being very aggressive (economically, politically or militarily) towards too many other alliances. The reasons should be unique and catchy, not boring and bland. 

  4. 5 hours ago, hidude45454 said:

    damn bruh you ain't even the one fighting chill

    Once a war breaks out everyone has to stop producing and fully militarize. Then we have to stand around and wait till you stop fighting. That prolongs alliance growth and development, pausing production stops other spheres from outperforming the ones at war. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  5. Are you complaining about changes in the game that reflect an opinion some people don't like? 

    You're a homophobic, racist, misogynistic, transphopic, eugenicist, Fascist, divisive, racist, homophobe. You should be reported, kicked out of servers, alliances and just banned. Just go!! 

     

     

     

    (did I do it right?) 

    • Haha 1
    • Downvote 1
  6. This nation has trades that are for way more than the asking price on the market. However, his is on top of all offers instead of near the bottom. For example $10,000/ton for 230 Steel. When you view his trade history, he has performed multiple trades that seem to be bugging out similarly. However, he never returned any of the resources, therefore I don't know if he's aware of the bug. Anywho here is the nation link.

    https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=263800

    Trade history (web archived on 07/25/23) 

    /web/20230726013657/https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=263800&display=trade

     

     

     

  7. On 6/28/2023 at 9:35 AM, Cheburashka said:

    How can we strike a balance between competition and collaboration among alliances? Is it possible to have healthy rivalries without resorting to aggression? Share your ideas on maintaining a peaceful and dynamic environment within the game.

    It's possible to strike a balance between competition and collaboration by simply reducing alot of the egos in this game. People don't collaborate because they have a different idea and instead of compromising they fight. Another way it could be possible is always have newer players join with new ideas. Alot of older players don't want that because it means their decrepid, ill-bred opinions and actions won't have any basis or support. 

    • Upvote 1
  8. On 6/28/2023 at 9:35 AM, Cheburashka said:

    What role should non-aligned nations play in the global stage? Should they be facilitators of peace, neutral entities, or independent powerhouses that challenge the status quo? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of being a non-aligned nation.

    The traditional role non aligned nations play is raider. There are a few alliances dedicated to non alignment like Arrgh. Recently there has development of micro alliances that contain two to three really strong nations that pretty much fend for themselves. Sometimes they have loose ties to an alliance. So I guess you can say the role of non aligned nations is evolving. Those nations goals should definitely be to challenge the status quo.

    It's too many people being lazy (or simply wanting to be a hector) and not wanting to change the status quo to make the game more dynamic. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.