TheRebelMan
-
Posts
434 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by TheRebelMan
-
-
50 minutes ago, Ryan1 said:
HEY GUYS MY NAME IS EMPEROR JONAS PLZ REMOVE WAR AND UPVOTE ME!
(worst ideas)
Lemme correct that for you
HEY GUYS MY NAME IS EMPEROR JONAS PLZ LET ME TROLL YOU!
-
3
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Gatorcock said:
What are you trying to tell us?
I wonder how many people noticed the KKK T in the title.
-
1
-
-
Dammit.
I could've said "Winter is Coming" if yall actually cancelled.
-
21 minutes ago, WISD0MTREE said:
A fake picture of the Earth. We all know it's not round or flat - it's a torus.
A post WW2 era soldier wearing a gaskmask and holding a rifle whose style is mainly associated with the military. Model of which I do not know.
-
13 minutes ago, Micchan said:
Here we go, part 3
Now you done it. You hurt Bluebear's feelings.
Gotta do one of these from his perspective now.
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, Darknight said:
But what if they’re switching protectors and not actually planning to have multiple protectors? XP
Is that better or is that worse for an alliance a year old?
-
6 minutes ago, Malleator said:
KoM still exists?
It is a year old, and still a protectorate.
RIP any hopes for it.
-
3
-
-
15 minutes ago, MoonShadow said:
Really still with the multis claim do you not have anything new or even truthful?, Well I guess if Fark claim NPO is just an extension of Fark you would not have an issue if they rolled on in then, as you claimed it would not effect anything.
You should have kept it soup vs Fark/WTF and you didn't, anyone can claim another alliance is an extension.
It's funny how defensive you got over this, Wonder if all ex members of nuke bloc now say they are extensions of FARK/WTF no matter what alliances they are in they are still members of FARK/WTF, clearly going on your statement if they joined Fark or WTF they would not be ghosts just returning home to fight ?>One offshore person is an esteemed member of Soup. One of my best buddies ingame.
>Other offshore is lead by a officer in Soup
It Is A tHrEe On OnE!
Mkay! -
7 minutes ago, Gatorcock said:
One decent alliance, and one downright trash alliance buddying up. Coolio.
Which one is the decent one?
-
7 minutes ago, MoonShadow said:
So can Fark/WTF now claim other alliances are extensions of them and call those alliances in to action ?, I mean do not matter how you label it or how many are in said alliances it is now 3v2 and Soup has pulled two other alliances in to a fight they said they would fight 1v2 ?
Is this bait?
-
3
-
-
3 minutes ago, Hayley said:
Basing this fact on?!?
Numbers I think.
-
9 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:
Stop it dude, you are so adamant to prove that this war is even that you are going to now sell us on the fact that your military sucks?
Just admit what everyone with half a brain already knows, you started a war that you guys knew you would have almost no chance of losing. It's ok Rebel, everyone does it.
I give Fark and WTF kudos for being good sports about it.
Inexperienced. Not incompetent. Big difference buddy.
But we can argue that too Ronny.
-
1
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:
I'm pretty sure I have said the same thing 3 different ways... but let me try a 4th way.
You want to hit people, go for it. But dont insult the rest of us by trying to sell the bullshit that this war is even.
You were able to plan and launch an attack against an unsuspecting opponent, in a game were establishing early control is the best way to win. On top of using your allies to prevent then from getting help. Holy shit, I just looked at the numbers, I assumed you guys had a 2-1 disadvantage the way you were talking, they have 52 members, you have 45... So like 98% of every other war on orbis, this one was over before you launched the first attack.I assume you don't take tiering into account?
But whatevs ya say Ronny.
Oh. And let's add to the fact that Soup milcom is at best, inexperienced, in matters of high gov planning and logistics.
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:
I love me some war, but dont sucker punch me and then run around saying you just beat me in a fair fight.
So lemme get this straight. You approve of dogpiling WTFark, but disapprove of a smaller alliance taking both of them on?
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:
good on fark and wtf for not being upset about getting hit out of the blue, and then having to listen to the people that hit them that its a fair and even fight.
I remember when Sparta tried that against grumpy, they even spouted that whole even war thing because our unmilitarized cities we were bigger then them. Then because screw you for hitting us, I called in every single ally I had to roll the shit out of them.So would it be correct to say that you just disapprove of wars in general?
-
1
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:
If this was really a good natured war, I assume you guys gave them a few days heads up that you were coming so they could prepare?
Who does that ever lmao.
Just cause they didnt receive a warning doesn't mean it isn't a good natured war. I feel like non WTFark people are more salty about us hitting WTFark than WTFark is. WTFark understands that this is an even war, and the outcome is up to them.
Why yall gotta be salty, Salt Ronny D?
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, Singha said:
It's a revenge hit. We played for the other team during Knightfall.
What's a revenge hit?
-
Haha. Nice.
I honestly expected more salt, but I do appreciate an effort in fighting back. That's better than salt.
This turned from "Yes, let's see some salt" to "Damn, oof, let's see what we can do" for me.
Thanks for the fight guys.-
1
-
-
Agreed.
-
3
-
-
10 minutes ago, Avakael said:
Cut nukes to 8-10 resistance damage and 4 MAP, and give them the same current damage that they have today.
Also, cut missiles to 2 MAP, 3-5 resistance damage and no infra loss, but make them always destroy an improvement if they hit.
Add a national project that allows you to select which specific city you want to nuke or missile.
That would make nukes OP.
-
7 minutes ago, Avakael said:
I've previously suggested that both nukes and missiles need to be reworked, but never gotten anywhere. They're not even the most efficient way to destroy infra.
I don't think the point of nukes is to be efficient. The point of nukes is so you can fight back when all is lost and to the gist of that.
-
1
-
4
-
-
49 minutes ago, MoonShadow said:
Come on be smarter dude, Soup planned this and had everyone maxed before hitting, Fark basically was sleeping and got hit during a nap and as you said 12 was never hit so that's 45 vs 20, not hard to wipe them out in a blitz now is it.
Soup planned this sure.
But WTFark has a solid chance.
But, every turn that goes uncountered they lose more and more people down to the Soup meatgrinder.And nah, we didn't have everyone at max mil before the blitz.
-
13 minutes ago, Nintendo said:
Ah yes, we are already defeated. No hope at all for us. My military is already at 0 units!
This is actually an intriguing declaration. Nation wise, it's pretty even, and if we did the unthinkable and coordinated our defenses, we could, in all likely, "win" the war, assuming other TKR nations don't magically appear in our soup.
The beer dam of WTF has been opened. So cheers to all and happy fighting!
-
7 minutes ago, Epi said:
Idk, Kastor may have a point. Only 13 dudes from Fark-WTF aren't zeroed rn. Soup wiped about half of em in their blitz and are still at high mil
Your point is???
-
1
-
Elephants: A Knight in Space
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
They rebranded to the fake SK.