Senatorius
-
Posts
139 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Senatorius
-
-
It is kinda wierd (and probably not very healthy for OWF) that this has happened... still anyone that disagrees with me is an ignorant radical now so thats niceI have a question though, since when did paracov and IQ become known as " the left"?
-
Down declares do seem absurd but I dont like the timer idea( get rid of the buy and sell one too). We would have to restrict up declares to if we were to nerf down declares as the current proposal makes me think that we are just going to make up declares the problem
How many cities can a opponent have before we consider it too much though? (just wondering what peoples thoughts are)
-
Did any word come from the great sheep about this issue? I can see the value in making city count the main focus of determining NS. If a nation that has been ZMd either get help from alliance/coalition members or if they can't maybe your alliance should look at peace of some form?(assuming it isn't an isolated case but a general collapse) The game should encourage is quick decisive wars that allows for fast recovers and then another war relatively quickly.
-
Ok idk if you guys r german or not, but the "Gott mit uns" phrase in ur alliance description would make way more sense if you would write "Gott ist mit uns"
just sayin though
Gott mit uns is just fine from a historical perspective
-
1
-
-
Always a solid alliance o7 tC
-
You guys relying on bots to do all the work are going to be what cause Orbis to become like the Matrix
Just wait till the bots coup all our alliances leaders for our own good
-
6
-
-
Everyone voted in or out for different reasons... some voted out for the reasons you have pointed out but for others it was a case of our friends and allies asked us to. It could be seen as the paperless philosophy having an impact on how alliances view their treaties I suppose.
-
Don't question the disfunctional internal politics Seabass!!! Christians never agree on anything
-
Everytime I see people elawyering about MDP vs ODP vs Paperless... I stop and wonder if the are actually serious about it.... help me out do people actually take this seriously? ??
-
Pretty sure SK DoWd BK
-
Thats how we think of ourselves
-
1
-
-
Well first off this doesn't really belong in Alliance Announcements but I would love to head up this organization.
Kastor is the perfect guy to head up the overseeing of the bank industry
-
1
-
-
TKR o7
But seriously Rob where is the tC option???
-
That makes sense and no one in CS is resentful... the treaty as it stood just wasn't aiding anyone
-
I think you are right about the demote part
-
I don't think the CS-UPN treaty ever resulted in it being activated by either side because it was pre-total coalition war and politics at the time.. hence it was dropped...
-
My hippos decided to come check out Polaris nations.
Hippo cavalry. .. hell yes
-
Oi! I never agreed to this!
What was that? I don't have a choice? Well too bad. I am remaining neutral as I always am.
That is next level not right
-
4
-
-
There will be a mandatory training camp at Partisan's desert ranch. Refreshments and lunch will be provided.
You say that but its really just water and a biscuit
-
Yay sewer people
-
1
-
-
To be fair to Pantheon it wasn't like OO or Syndisphere was planning to attack or desired to... so Pantheon had to start this whole thing with little warning... it could take 3 days for a big alliance to mobilize to a surprise attack, specially for their first time fighting together
-
Got some man tears going right now
o7 tC ... finally we get the same front
MFW tC blitz better than alliances with 10x their membership
You guys are savages!!
o/ tC
Imagine tC with a tenth member
-
2
-
-
Nice to see you guys in
o/ BoC
-
I am happy this was done, maybe this will give our government the incentive to stop the mindless and bloody Cornerstone-CS War that has been raging for months now.
I will never stop fighting those CS slime!
War. War Never Changes.
in Alliance Affairs
Posted · Edited by Senatorius
If the other side already has your CB then why not share it. I know you claim to be hiding the identity of someone but if the otherside have it then they know the identity... so the only people not in the know are... the neutrals and people that you claim are being used. Might not Bollocks and co. be a little miffed at being kept in the dark if there is a legit CB?