Zhen
-
Posts
106 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Zhen
-
-
I affirm this agreement. Looking forward to rebuilding with you all.
-
2
-
-
Since the VIP was extended to everyone, it's most likely that Imgur (being the most popular image hosting site) was essentially alerted to PW using it to show images, which is actually against their TOC: Also, don't use Imgur to host image libraries you link to from elsewhere, content for your website, advertising, avatars, or anything else that turns us into your content delivery network. If you do – and we will be the judge – or if you do anything illegal, in addition to any other legal rights we may have, we will ban you along with the site you're hotlinking from, delete all your images, report you to the authorities if necessary, and prevent you from viewing any images hosted on Imgur.com. We mean it.
Sure there's ways to state it's for Fair use and what not, but I'll leave this to the 200+ E-Lawyers on here. And who knows, maybe they are being nice and just disabling the links. I don't know.That all said, there are ways to get your images to show. I personally use Discord for my images. I made a server that I plan to never delete, and just added my images into it. Click on the image, choose 'Open Original' and take that link. Works with your front page using the BBC coding as well. You can also use https://imgbb.com/ which I found to be much more lenient than any other. The Google Photos is nice, but sadly PW only allows JPEG and PNG images
Sadly this is only a fix for header, cover, military, city, background and other images you can place. Your national and Alliance flags will be the same links from other image hosting sites, but this is where @Alex has to go and change EVERY link from what it was, to a new link. How he wants to do it for the God knows how many people, is not for me to say. However, it's an issue the community now faces, and with this being a 'part-full' time job for him with people investing in this game as much as they would World of Warcraft, I'm sure Sheepy had a plan of action to go about doing this.
-
1
-
1
-
-
All Hail the Holy Snek!
-
-
19 hours ago, Critters said:
You need to take that warchest to the gym more often
Forget the warchest, get that guy a charge pack or something. If his phone dies, we will have to wait for more exciting videos.
-
2
-
-
Good luck to both parties.
-
2
-
-
Given the current events going on with the leadership of GPC, as well as the score differential that was happening on protecting them, I can see how this was a treaty that needed to end.
Zeon wishes both Golden Phoenix Coalition, as well as her ally Band of the Hawk, a peaceful existence between them, and a prosperous future ahead.
-
-
Good things are to come. Great rebrand. I look forward to the future.
-
1
-
-
https://gyazo.com/1ac0a494be77da9be1bd8e5c9a7d5e99
Nation in question: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=98876
Is there a mod or admin that might be able to explain? -
Welcome! Glad to see a new alliance form. I wish you the best in all that you work to accomplish.
-
2 hours ago, Hope said:
>spelling lazers with an s
otherwise o7
-
Due to the hostile actions of a low tier member against Zeon that resulted in the loss of zero personnel, The Principality of Zeon hereby declares war against the Yukikuni Protectorate. As Sovereign, I refuse to allow such transgressions, and hereby order Lord Sval to surrender to the few forces that are charging against their more powerful nation.
A state of war now exists between the Principality of Zeon and the Yukikuni Protectorate. -
17 hours ago, Darth Revan said:
If you really want to embargo another alliance petition or order your members to do it, its not that hard.
That would work well in smaller alliances with maybe twenty people or fewer. Other alliances that have more than this (basically the top 25) would have a much harder time with this.
Who knows, this might also help break some of the deadlock politically in the game. And for a lot of people this would be a great aspect to introduce.
-
What about an alliance being able to embargo another alliance so that the members do not trade with each other?
-
It should be an easy implementation as well, since the system of treaties makes it where nations in treatied alliances can't attack each other, then embargoes against alliances will make it where the nations in those alliances can't trade with one another.
I feel if the NAP treaties being hidden on the treaty web can be fixed up within a hour of being suggested, a response to this thread certainly could be done.
-
2 minutes ago, Edward I said:
I don't see how it's complicated. It's a couple of extra clicks per embargo on the front end and few more lines of code that check what tax bracket a nation is in on the back end. It wasn't meant to be a suggestion about which user interface we should put the button in, it was meant to be a compromise between the "don't be lazy, mobilize your players" camp and the "why isn't this already a feature" camp.
After having two extra cups of coffee, I completely see what you are saying now. I apologize for that.
At the very least, this could be implemented in this way. But that might require 'effort' so...We shall see lol.
-
1 minute ago, Edward I said:
You could do it based on alliance tax rates. Any bracket where the sum of the money and resource tax rates is greater than X could have alliance embargoes set for all nations in that bracket. That would further flesh out the distinctions between centralized and decentralized alliance economies and make tax rates a more important consideration for alliance leaders and players, especially those that focus on trading.
I feel this is an overly complicated input to a new feature. Perhaps it would be a window in the Alliance Control Panel near the Treaties where you can 'add' alliances that you can embargo.
This would make it where all members of each alliance can not trade with each other. It'll add more of a bite to the embargos, both politically and economically.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I feel it's come time that the function to allow alliance leaders to embargo another alliance should be implemented. Meaning, if the leader/leadership in alliance A embargos alliance B, all members in Alliance A will not be able to buy/sell with anyone in alliance B. I feel it would add a bit more bite to the embargo so to say.
If people in the alliance are against it, they can always petition to not have it, or just leave. Embargos hardly have any weight to them anyways, so I don't see it as a 'game changer' by any means, but it would add a little more political weight if this were allowed.
-
11
-
Nicely done. May you both prosper and grow.
-
Very nice.
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, Greene said:
Yeah, that's why Catsby was kicked out of Vault 111...
Time for a treaty update
-
1
-
-
On 6/26/2017 at 10:42 AM, Greene said:
Article IV; Additional Restrictions and Terms Applied to Vault 111
a. No member of Vault 111 will be allowed to make any statements, posts, threads, or content otherwise on the global forums. An explicit exemption is made for Catsby to post in the National RP section so long as those posts do not in any way reference non-RP aspects.-
1
-
-
At first I was highly skeptical about this, thinking maybe it would just be a bunch of topics with a heavy view to one side; I'm happy to say I was wrong on this.
-
1
-
[Peace] Too long in the making
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
This was in the make for some time, the timing was quite coincidental.