Hereno
-
Posts
1764 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Hereno
-
-
Are you a Vegan/Vegetarian?
no
also no
-
No, pigs and cattle are already on the prey half, and not intellegent. Now let me enjoy my great tasting Bacon cheesburger while you become a half hindu half jew in your food taste
pigs remember people for years and hold grudges. if you kick a pig when it is a baby it will remember you and attack you as an adult.
cows are aware that when the truck comes and their buddies go onto it they don't come back and so actively avoid being shipped off to their deaths, along with showing signs of depression.
-
Hereno, in your case i'm even for late abortions.
>stealing my joke in my thread
you're worse than a nazi
-
2
-
-
One of my fave swedes had an Algerian dad and was technically muslim, though she was white as a sheet. Definitely not practicing though. Let's not generalise.
The counterargument to OP is simple.
1. We do not have a population problem, so enforcing restrictions on people having children past one is unnecessary. If anything the birth rate is low.
2. Applying this to one race is racist. China might be comfortable with widespread racism but we're not.
3. I don't see how an increase in mixed race children will resolve the current issues with racism, it never has in the past.
4. You're assuming black and Asian people would respond to such a law by increasing their current rate of marriage or sex with white people. I don't see what incentive there is for them to do that.
This is a stupid argument.
1. Define "population problem". Right now there are plenty of unemployed people, and not enough jobs. To me, that could be considered a population problem.
2. Racism is not wrong on principle. If black people or Jews or anybody else were actually as terrible as the Klan or Hitler said they were, discrimination based on the reality of those people just not being "like us" wouldn't be a bad thing in the same way that making sure your dog is on a leash isn't discriminatory because it's being based in reality. Racism is a bad thing because by and large, the Klan and the Nazis are a bunch of !@#$ing idiots who made shit up and didn't know what they were talking about.
3. Mixed race children are much less likely to be racist due to having family and genes coming from two different races. I'm not saying it's impossible; there are plenty of people with internalized racism or sexism against their own groups. I'm just saying it's a lot harder, and that by promoting contact with other people, you're encouraging understanding.
4. One incentive is that white people are much more wealthy than almost all other groups, save for the Asians and Jews, as groups. White people are the least likely of any race to be in favor of, in practice, dating outside of their race, and this gives them a big incentive to do that. That's the problem and this fixes it - the other races tend to be pretty cool with miscegenation.
-
-removed for rule break-
in my next thread i'm going to argue in favor of late late term abortions up to the age of 21 to help get rid of some of the shitposters on this forum when their parents find out what they've been up to
-
1
-
-
Sounds like you've taken a trip to Swedistan with that talk. People over there really say stupid crap like we need to all marry Muslims (paraphrasing most I've heard but what they really mean) so we get "coloured" children. Last time I saw such talk it was a gay man ironically which is incredible on two levels. First that he refuses to do his so called duty himself, and second that he'd quickly regret such things when he has a sword coming down on his neck.
for the sake of being honest here
1. this thread was the result of me mis-reading the thread about non-whites getting less rights and deciding to do something retaliatory
2. i'm still doing it mainly because i'm pretty confident that i can successfully argue something as ridiculous as the OP against the people here
-
1
-
-
!@#$ it, I'll take the bait.
The reason blacks, (say black, they've been here for generations now for !@#$'s sake) have so many abortions is because of a huge lack of responsibility. Poor black families (if you can even call them that) normally are absent a father. Meaning there is little discipline. Boys are never taught respect and live in a culture that treats women as dumb sex objects. (Listen to rap music and hip hop) So black kids just want the sex without the responsibility.
Hell, even the Catholic Mexicans do better than blacks. And they have tons of kids! (because Catholicism thinks condoms are bad or whatever)
There. Call me racist, but the facts back it up.
Now if you need me I'll be in the hospital getting this hook removed.
this thread is not about the reason behind black american abortion rates being higher, this thread is about the many benefits that we could gain from an affirmative abortion policy to raise white abortion rates up to those of black americans, as detailed in the OP
-
You cant just go and make abortions only legal for one race. Even if you do not like the race, this would more or less ensure the destruction of the white race. I'm not one for white genocide conspiracy's, but this could be considered white genocide if implemented. If the same was done to black people, this could be considered black genocide. I have a feeling that this whole thread is a troll though. But who would you consider white for the purposes of this? How would you be able to test for whiteness before the abortion is done? Race is very hard to determine through any sort of testing, and would be a problem for mixed race individuals. What if someone was majority white (looks so white you would think that they are fully white) but they actually had 1/128 black blood in them? Would you consider Eastern European people or other non Aryans (such as the Poles or the Irish who have been Oppressed throughout history) to be considered white for this?
OP is either a good troll or an actual racist if he believes that the destruction of one race/ethnicity will benefit any country
abortion would still be legal for all races without regard to the policy
race would be determined by having a majority european ethnic background or by self-identification as "white". the same way it is determined now. misrepresentation might be a problem, sure, but we already have records for everyone who is born now, and we know who their parents are. it would be very hard to get away with lying, and future children's races could be inferred based on the races of their parents.
-
i don't think this would go well with taxing purchased resources (ie. i buy 100 steel but only get 90)... it would have to be only on money earned from trades, and you can already tax those resources as they're created, meaning this would only give alliances the new ability to tax people who are playing the market, while potentially adding in a double tax on resource producers. i'm not sure if i agree or not, tbh.
-
China is evil, we shouldn't copy evil, so we shouldn't copy china.
how is china evil?
-
i've never really understood why we're always able to know stuff like the complete improvement composition of every opposing city
having the war policy of foreign nations be public knowledge is just an absurd version of how much information we get
like why isn't it at least my choice to reveal if i have nukes and, if so, how many? that's how it is IRL
-
1
-
-
Frequently in the abortion debate, conservatives bring up the point that an overwhelmingly large number of abortions in America are performed by African-American women as opposed to women of other races. In China, the one-child policy is a state-enforced practice specifically meant to encourage miscegenation by applying only to the largest (Han) ethnic group within the country. As a result, inter-racial marriage and better inter-ethnic relations are encouraged, as well as parents to put a lot of time and energy into the children that they do have, making them better people. I think a similar plan could work in the United States to help us to be more like China, who most of us are very scared of anyway. I believe that mandating abortions for any fully-white babies after the first child could help make America great again. Thoughts?
-
mission accomplished
-
i really unironically like jefftopia
can we vote for him
-
What's that supposed to mean? Just because I'm in an alliance doesn't mean I cannot have my own opinions.
you're their mofa
you are tasked with being the public face of your alliance
like as much as i shit on partisan for being a dick to me i am aware that it is in his job description to defend his alliance even when it does stupid things
if there is any single member of government who is not allowed to just post their stupid opinions everywhere, be a forum troll, and subvert their own alliance's fa goals, it is your position, and you've done all three
-
Your obsession with GPA has crossed into unhealthy territory.
nice to see you finally posting something on the forums that makes GPA look something other than bad
-
Technically neither has Capitalism. I know several nations that claim to have implemented it but it is not actually Capitalism. What Communists claim to hate is not actual Capitalism but Corporatism.
we already tried "limited government" and it turned into "corporatism"
there's no difference, stop reading libertarian shit
america went from a slave-owning society where only white male land-owners could participate in the democracy to a corporate whorehouse where multinationals decide our policies. it was never good and it will never be good.
-
1
-
-
don't tell me what to do
-
I support Sanders because he's basically a communist but one who also wants to be a politician. You can tell when he's lying about stuff because he isn't a good liar even after over 70 years alive, and his voting record points to his politics in practice actually being quite radical.
I would still vote for Clinton over any of the Republicans, because despite the fact that she's a liar, you can also tell when she's lying because she's also terrible at it. When she said she isn't a natural politician, I believed her. You really can tell. Yes, she flip flops on issues... because she is a politician who wants to get elected. She literally just does whatever the electorate wants her to do. Really, she's exactly what people say they want, and I think she gets a lot of flak because she's a woman, not because of why people say they hate her. She's quite a bit farther to the right than me but I wouldn't say she's bad by any standard. All that bullshit she pulls to get elected she has shown willing to pull to get results as a politician when it comes to important progressive issues.
Trump gets a bad rap because he's abrasive as shit, but a lot of what he says gets taken the wrong way by dumb people. He lies like hell, though, so you never know what he actually believes, but what he's been consistent on is sorta like national socialism lite. Not a Nazi by any means, but he generally supports white people, American nationalism, and Keynesian economics. He's "moderate" by Republican standards, but he also has some crazy ideas that you can never know just how serious he is about implementing. Basically, he can't be trusted, but I don't think he'll be quite as bad as people make him out to be.
Kasich gets called "moderate" and "sensible" all the time, but honestly, he's a !@#$ing loon. So is Cruz. I don't trust Trump at all but those two are just as bad as Bush, if not worse, with regards to intelligence and ridiculous Christian conservatism.
-
2
-
-
Acting like an AA is a single entity and everyone in it has the same personalities though. Sick. Your "truths" are also mostly subjective opinions and feelings and I also would bet I could ask others and they'd say different things about you. Also I would believe that Steve and James don't think that what they say are straight up lies, but nonetheless I don't take what they say at face value. A truth for one isn't the same for another and just because someone doesn't think they're lying doesn't mean you should take their word for it at face value.
Not sure what this is referring to but as an example of the above what is considered as begging is subjective and thinking that's embarassing is subjective.
I don't really know you so how would ik that?
you need to get out more
this is not intended as an insult, but goddamn, intellectual masturbation seems to have left you blind to reality
-
Where has it said that he has to 'embarass himself'? What does that constitute accrding to you?
As for acting in the same ways- I think we have provided ample proof to support our rationale and why we made what decisions we made.
Good job on admitting that the only reason you are arguing for Alpha (not going to call them NG as that is another game) for no other reason than being butthurt over me protecting a young alliance which you unneccessarily called out over OOC-related matters without looking at any context or doing any research whatsoever. Viking theme with Nordic runes still =/= Nazi clone.
i'd say begging for peace on the first day of war is pretty embarrassing
1. Didn't say he should? I gave him kudos for not making me want to figuratively end my life rofl. I also have no idea if my leaders do this as this is the first war I've been in, but I think I can safely doubt that since you provided not a single shred of evidence for that. "Hey let's just say things w/o anything to back it up." !@#$ is that stupid.
2. Pretty stupid as well; "gonna argue over something that I don't necessarily agree with because someone not related to who I'm arguing with said shit I didn't like."
3. Glad you shared that with us.
@syrup hyperbole is hyperbole however poor the context it maybe in (didn't see post before it got removed).
is it really that hard to understand that i agree with what i'm saying but that i'd be too lazy to bother arguing it if i didn't also dislike their opponents? i don't lie or argue things i don't believe in, as a personal rule, so that people know they can take what i say at face value. it's called having a reputation as someone who is honest. you guys should try it sometime.
-
Kudos to Steve for not making me want to take a brick to the head in his past few posts here. Glad the, "you guys are liars and spinning everything" with no further proof at all bs has stopped. Then again it's still ridiculous to act as though you're looking for diplomacy when Partisan's queries remain empty from Alpha high gov themselves (apparently).
why should steve embarrass himself for nothing? it isn't like your government doesn't act in exactly the same ways that steve has, it's just that he ended up losing.
and yes, i am literally willing to sit here and argue in favor of people from NG who have hated me for years over partisan being a dick to me about you guys protecting a nazi clone
it's a shame it wasn't 1v1 and you both didn't get the shit kicked out of you. but i don't believe pre that he would've stayed out anyway; nor do i believe steve that he would've kept it 1v1 if given the chance. bunch of !@#$ing liars, all of you.
-
1
-
-
then what was the purpose of that pic by Moreau?
Rape isn't a joke Moreau. If you don't want to look like you are joking about rape then don't use the word rape.
Also negative points for those who didn't see the irony of the joke.
they really aren't [above making those kinds of jokes]
hence why he did it again immediately after saying that's not what he was doing
he's a !@#$in idiot homie
-
yeah you have a bad habit of doing all the small updates so you can just shit something out rather than working on important things that take a bit of time but will do volumes more with it
-
1
-
Should white abortion be mandated?
in General Debate
Posted
people already have, so lol