Jump to content

RagnarBuliwyf

VIP
  • Posts

    878
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by RagnarBuliwyf

  1. I play and i'm quite good at it.

    At least arcade mode/ tanks. 

    Waiting for the new patch with the Tommies.

     

    They promised an engine update, so i hope my driver doesn't die anymore when i hit a small stone/staircase with 5 mp/h  :'|

     

    5GJJdmw.png

    Only Panzers though, since...

     

    3v1ybf.jpg

    You're welcome to come play with me and my guys. We play Tanks/realistic. We run mostly tier 4's and have a good laugh. 

  2. All of this has been over the forums before,if you've ever aid attention but I'll restate them here and now:

     

    TEst only had your back because of Guardian. When SK threatened to destroy us if we didn't kick a member it burnt any good will that ever existed. We pocketed that ill-will out of respect for out long time ally,Guardian. Guardian had said they'd back us as did TC if it came to blows,but we ate crow because our dear friends requested it.

     

    Then when Shellhound got called out with a ring of multis and Tenages plotting a war we were never even privy to but they still managed to include us in their plans. We didn't want part of a beat down we had nothing to do with and the other side offered to let us off if we attacked SK,it all worked out well for us. We regret letting Guardian hand out to dry over that but that event was out of our hands and something we couldn't condone.

     

    We were involved in the plans tS had and we knew that this would later those chickens,like all others,would come home to roost. We accept that,its just the cost of doing business.

     

    So know this,if you're going to mention shitty allies,TEst should never be uttered in that same breadth.

    Being screwed over by SK is a trait of the alliance. I'd have thought TEst would've learnt that months ago. 

  3. No, I just don't find anything funny or clever in this thread considering the situation. 

    What situation? 

     

    We're losing some wars, boo-hoo. Been there done that before, it's no big deal to lose some infra. We've learnt new things within Vanguard, we've also learnt that our opponents lack spines, as per hitting an alliance like 1/3 of their size.

     

     

    Also fyi, this announcement is totally serious. 

    • Upvote 3
  4. I created a clan early this year and on the site itself, I've decided to start a gaming/tech & hardware news blog. Currently I'm after a few writers to help me with writing articles related to anything within general entertainment. 

     

     

    The site itself is, http://vgcn.net/and the news section is http://vgcn.net/News  I'll stress, it's nothing to do with Vanguard on P&W. We have the same name but we were around prior to the alliances creation on this game. 

     

    Anyone interested?

  5. It was tested, I think that's acceptable, protect your tanks if you want to keep them. Tank kills wernt actually changed in the recent war changes.

    Not tested to an acceptable level, 1.8k tanks in a single airstrike (I had near on 7000 less than 30 mins ago) and now I'm below 200, that's not something with a war system that's suppose to last a few rounds and have various aspects. 

     

    Hell, if you strictly hit air attacks against people with tanks. You're doing more damage than if you actually nuke them due to the resource/unit loss. When the damage is that high, something is wrong. 

     

    Why build tanks then? Why doesn't everyone focus on air? I mean, hit them once and you'll wipe their entire military out because sheepy overlooked yet another issue to rush and get a useless baseball feature out. 

  6. Lord Dr Rush of Reasonable Logic ordered an airstrike upon your nation of Vinland. The attack was an immense triumph. Lord Dr Rush's forces lost 26 aircraft, while your defenders lost 92 aircraft. You used 45.00 munitions and gasoline defending the attack. The attack destroyed 87.33 infrastructure in the city of Vaglodihr and 1,890 tanks. 

     

    This loss has resulted in your opponent gaining air superiority. Air superiority halves your tank combat value in ground battles. To end your opponent's air superiority you must execute an airstrike that is a success, another player must achieve an immense triumph airstrike on your opponent, or you must destroy all of your opponent's aircraft.

     

     

     

    Infra damage I can understand. However the damage dealt against tanks is beyond atrocious, I didn't have an insignificant amount of aircraft vs his either, just over 1/4th of his total (200 vs 800) which I get is still a small amount so I would be in a losing battle.

    However not to an extent like that where it's beyond broken. 

     

     

    This is why you don't change shit without testing it first. 

    • Upvote 1
  7. Well this kinda seals the deal on Vanguard.

    What're we sealing?

     

     

     

    People realize joining the bloc changed nothing right? We were already treatied to both alliances.....

     

     

    Right?

  8. Small suggestion for the treaty web. 

     

    Maybe add bullet points to the top corner with what each colour represents treaty wise.  I know you can hover over it, but it's just a cosmetic lazy thing. 

    • Upvote 1
  9. The Parties are encouraged to share technological and monetary assistance with the other if requested.

     

     

     

    Did you copy that from (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways)? Looks like you copied it from (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways). :|

    • Upvote 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.