Ashland
-
Posts
1323 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Ashland
-
-
I've cried a few times.
But, you might bring it all out of me. please...stop....
I hope your nation is getting demolished sarcastically too. That would be way less embarrassing.
"Oh, sure! Yeah! The planes are totally dropping out of the sky and the ships are all sinking. Uhuh."
-
1
-
-
No I don't man stop assuming !@#$, it seems its all your good at but I made a judgemnt based on your views and your leaders view I see you as very hateful and bored, Declare war on the ESA fine but do not dare to disgrace its name by trying to blame us for this war, you were bored plain and simple.
Reported for being a multi. We caught you, Arthur Fraser.
Did Sheepy implement a forum-spying mechanic? Because this forum argument feels a lot like the battles I'm fighting against you guys.
-
Ok to be clear your saying you had our backs (Please name all the times in a clear post)
oh and don't use snailmun as an excuse. His actions never reflected the ESA and about the "hate" post on our forums I bet
If I had access to your forums I would see twice as much. Hypocrites
So you know it's there because... you can't see it?
Guys, idk, ESA's mastery of logic and argumentation is pretty impressive.
#PRdefeat
@Speaker, when have you ever been known to get emotional?
-
Can't trust those filthy international bankers, you know?
ILU Kurdanak.
-
Hahahah dead to rights Ashlands you wouldn't know rights if the bit you in the ass (fuel the drama keyboard warriors lol)
Oh, you got me.
I don't know rights, guys. War's over. Go home.
@TheSpeaker, well if I want to compete for making you look like a huge a-hole, I'd always lose to you.
-
Really? C'mon now.
03:06 TheSpeaker: Are you even gov in BoC?
03:06 Ashland: Yes.
03:06 Ashland: I am merely the Minister of Education.
03:06 Ashland: As you could imagine my powers are quite insignificant.
03:07 Ashland: And I exercise little to no influence or authority on any matters.
03:07 TheSpeaker: Education empowers the minds of all - that is pretty significant
03:07 TheSpeaker: But I got you
Let's give them the full story Ashy.
Well no shit. I was being sarcastic since you opened up with "Are you even in gov?" I met your tone with a similar tone. Did you actually not pick up on that? Jeeeesus.
-
Ashland you are a warmonger lol you take everything the wrong way, this war started because all you want to do is blame others
Just throwing ESA members at this thread won't help you guys.
The hypocrisy is there in black and white.
We've got you guys dead to rights.
Hold still and I swear that I won't bite.
Swim, fishies, swim!
MrBooty would be proud.
-
Absolutely agree 100% I am with you & ESA till the end. GO ESA!
I wish that could be said for all your members.
Also, wonder why we're fighting? !@#$ like this:
[03:20] <TheSpeaker> I'll talk to the gov of your alliance that are significant then.[03:20] <TheSpeaker> Good Night.Lol... You know nothing, Jon Snow. -
Again - list the multiple times you stuck our necks out for us.....cuz you say that, then only leave the example of our member, who no longer is a member....who made the stupid decision to "threaten" Cynic.
Also Clean up a mess? Was it on your mouth.....? From the looks of it, you guys posted the public drop of the amendment, GR and Arrgh both agreed to leave...which leaves you with the White Sphere, exactly the way it was before, PLUS 2 alliances. Such a huge mess I guess.
Ages? Dude...this was like a month.
Ya'll need a box of tissues, damn.
He was a member at the time. And Cynic had also spoken of treating it as an act of war. I'm sure my friends in BoC and UST can provide other examples.
On my mouth? Are you a child? And yes, it was a mess PR wise. You even said it was a mess. And I guess it was just too much for you.
I need a box of tissues? You need spies, bro.
Speaker, I think there's some confusion. I know you were in Guardian so you have a bit of their bragadoccio... but you see, they actually earned it. Glad I could clear that up.
-
You guys were just looking for and waiting for any excuse you could find. But have fun trying to pick on the alliance that is half your strength & has half the members. But what ever I need this practice my first war. We will fight until the death if needed. Good luck and I hope something happens that turns the tides for us. I am and will continue to be a loyal ESA member.
First of all, bullcrap. You earned the resentment of both of your allies with your condescension and uppity behavior.
You earned our scorn when we routinely stuck our necks out for you, such as trying to keep YOUR member from getting rolled when he nearly blew our peace sky high.
You earned our wrath by insulting us further while leaving us to clean up a mess that was at least partly your fault because when we, you know, tried to keep your member from getting rolled, we overstepped our powers in ways that Speaker overstepped his on a daily !@#$ing basis.
We tolerated your insults and arrogance for ages. We were silent when we heard about you insulting us behind our backs because you were our allies. We have proven that we are good allies and now we will prove that we are good enemies.
-
3
-
-
Socialists always under-estimate the power of Capitalism. You poor, poor fools.
-
First on my menu is Ashland.
I blushed.
-
I !@#$ing love this. I just... I !@#$ing love this.
-
You make me feel so uncreative.
-
Anyways
I'm sure you have your reasons.
Yeah. And it actually doesn't matter what your reasons are. If you guys feel like you're better off without us for whatever reason, then that's your prerogative. And if you guys felt unsatisfied then you should have left, I suppose. Better that we're all on the same page, as Tenages said.
Good luck to you. Sorry for the brief outburst.
ESA has been very upfront with us during the events of last week. TheSpeaker himself told me he wrote the amendment and wanted to defend it, no matter how bad that would've ended for CC.
Yes, I do remember you mentioning that.
-
1
-
-
Good to figure out you're going on different paths sooner than later.
Drama for the drama mill? Please share.
I think I shan't for the nonce. But let's just say that we were approached by numerous people complaining that the ESA was !@#$ posting on the forums and then hiding behind our skirts and that that behavior had a lot to do with what happened. Not to mention that the entire amendment that caused the drama was written by TheSpeaker.
Also, the amendment that we posted was already agreed upon by all parties, we posted it because one of ESA's members had sent a threatening message to Cynic about attacking him and was about to blow our peace sky high. And Cynic was threatening to ZI the poor guy. So we posted it to keep one of our ally's members from getting his ass rolled and possibly provoking a full blown war.
Oh, I guess I did say it.
I obviously don't want to sour relations with the ESA more than they are already, but come on. We bail you guys out, stick our necks out for your member, and then you leave us holding the bag. Thanks, guys.
-
Now that you're out, can we tell everyone how everything that happened was almost exclusively your fault?
-
If I understand correctly, this is how I do it.
Bank account creation. Nation: Nasdin
withdraw/DEPOSIT amount: $700,000.
Nice. Sure.
-
I feel like a lot of good points have been brought up over the new changes and it's been made clear to me that maybe a different approach might be applicable over the current one.
1. As others have suggested, remove missiles and nukes from the MAP system. Part of the point of this most recent change was to make conventional warfare more relevant, so why don't we separate the use of missiles from the MAP system and it automatically solves this issue.
2. Limit the number of missiles or nukes that can be fired per war to a set amount, maybe six-ten (or two per day or something. I think this is fair in light of the recent nerfing). This solves the problem of having people only using missiles, and at the same time makes sure that one has options if they are loosing a war.
Both of these together will create a balance in the system. Missiles will be useful, but they won't be the only useful thing and they won't win you a war by itself. I apologize if anyone has made this suggestion already, I don't mean to steal your thunder.
EDIT: On suggestion number two. And clarification that most of the recent changes were positive, except number five as people have argued.
1: I think this is a bad idea. It lets people with missiles hit basically whoever they want without breaking their pace in a war.
2: This limit already exists with the MAP's
Hypothetical: Two nations go to war, one with missiles one without. Which happens. The one with missiles can launch missiles with impunity while making zero sacrifices in the war. Atrocious idea.
-
You do realize you could only do 3 spy ops per day, right?
-
If any of your members attack anyone in boc ever again I will ensure that you never have a moment's rest. You will never stop running. I will come for you and keep coming until you quit. It's one thing for strong alliances to attack us. That is the way of things. But for weak alliances to attack us is !@#$ing insulting.
Let me know when you get something worth breaking.
-
2
-
-
Excellent changes, Sheepy. I do, however, think that raising the upkeep costs of missiles even more should be on the table. And I say this as someone who has missiles. So clearly I'd be hurting myself too.
Call me.
-
1
-
-
Correction, Phiney HAD a valid point until he edited his post down and removed all the good points.
Wtf, Phiney?
-
Gib cash. 2 percent. 10 million.
Get out.
*Ashland arms himself with his trusty broom*
-
1
-
The Moment You Have All Been Waiting For
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
You mean after he's deleted all the good stuff? There really... Isn't anything to hide on our end. He did remove our access to the CC archives so there is that. However we do have screen shots of some things. So it'll be interesting to see what he deletes.
Let's do this.