Jump to content

Lupin III

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Lupin III

  1. 18 hours ago, Azazel said:

    Alrighty Ima take a moment to break this “silence” and point out a few key issues I’ve seen as a “general” political stance from our friends in TKR.


    1. I really find your lack of self-awareness concerning. Rather than look at the facts, you have gone out of your way to manufacture reasons Camelot went to war with you. To clear this up

      1. Camelot did not have any idea that Oasis was going to hit only HM. In fact, that surprised us and left us with only one potential target (you).

      2. You were never considered to be a primary target of ours until you decided to link up with HM. We had other ambitions in mind and TKR was only in the back of our minds. Sure, we have had our disputes of late, and disagree with how they were handled, however for the most part we moved on. The only large concern we carried with us was your continued narrative of “IQ times” which we clearly told you.

      3. Camelot cancelled out of the larger bloc we were part of as soon as we saw the Quack cancelation go live, we committed ourselves to mini-spheres and we were made to believe you did as well. In fact, we took what we considered a huge risk, it is no secret that there are a few alliances left split between spheres that hate us.


    1. Have you noticed how only a few people are rooting your “Cam IQ'' narrative on? Have you taken a moment to realize that people are moving on, and Cam has changed. The worst part of all of it is you took what essentially is the games equivalent to Hitler and dumbed it down to a meaningless narrative, now if the game ever needs to use that narrative in the future, you made it worthless and hold no value. Camelot is nothing like IQ. No matter how many times you yell it until your face turns blue. On that note I would stop throwing stone from your glass houses TKR….

    2. Finally, to sum this up, let us not forget you created yet another mega sphere with upper tier consolidation, please do everyone a favour. Drop the act and own it. You created this sphere and did not anticipate the game's reaction, you miscalculated. That is your mistake to bear, no amount of false narrative building is going to fix that.


    Now back to my slumber of ignoring the forums during war (because talking to my self is boring)


    1. "We saw the opportunity to dogpile you because you called us names" 

    2. Laughed at this one almost as hard as the "apology" thread

    3. "Mega Sphere" "Upper tier consolidation" Yes, they're going to keep reusing the same CB, I look forward to the same copy paste DoW from Cam next war! 

    Broke it down, you can thank me later. ;)

    • Upvote 1
  2. 494639574_LNTlogoforums.png.6646d895edfb9e01bbc8f4e623020378.png


    I'm going to keep this thread going for updates on the news station for those interested

    Thank you, those who have joined and interacted on the server!

    First, a bullet point:

    • As we are still looking for some experienced and active reporters, I've decided to create a 'salary' for the job. 90% of the money that comes from ads payed by companies or individuals will go to our employees, LNT will reserve the right to retain 10% of ad revenue. Funds going to employees will be split, however those who are not active will not get their cut. Any applications will be much appreciated. 

    A lot of people have joined, and if you want to aswell, simply click the original discord link in the message. It'll be cool seeing you there! 



    Thank you!


  3. 27 minutes ago, ComradeMilton said:

    You choose to do this. You're not "forced" to post at all. TS needs its own channel from what I've read and if you're not negotiating reasonably or acting like this is an equal negotiation it's quite natural that you might not be receiving responses as quickly as possible. Our representatives are likely waiting for you to be more cooperative before continuing.

    I read it in full. I explained he log dumped, even. This isn't going to help his side in negotiations at all. Perhaps Coalition B doesn't want its discussions linked so it's stopped responding for that reason when there was a log dump relatively earlier. This certainly isn't going to help anything.

    This is such a terrible way of trying to justify this kafkaesque negotiation.

    We've obviously seen in Partisan's post, the logs particularly, about his efforts to try and begin these talks, his attempts being either evaded or trolled. 

    As Partisan has repeatedly told you, how does it make it worse, if the talks aren't moving because of this ever-changing maze of demands?  

    I'm not sure how you've come about this conclusion.... 


    • Upvote 4
  4. 2 hours ago, Elijah Mikaelson said:

    then what happens when they swap from coal to iron?

    I was in Rose Econ and i know full well that if they taxed coal 100% you would all swap to something not being taxed sop how does that help?

    I think you missed that it was an example, I mean, perhaps even you could use that to shift alliance members onto other resources.

    But again, as I described in my post, it's supposed to be a flexible way for alliances to micromanage individual resources as they want. 

    Interesting question, but I think you are right in saying that if most people had an option to switch from 100% to 0% or something lower, they would and they do now too, by switching alliances. Although we might be at war with NPO I commend them for having a cool community to handle an 100/100 economy.

  5. taxes, Taxes, TAXES, TAXES

    Hello! Nice seeing you looking at this. Going away from all the huge game changer suggestions I've been seeing the past few weeks, this suggestion is more of a minor edit that can help (or not) those who wish to use it. It's very simple and I'm not sure anyone has suggested it before, but here's my pitch:

    -> Split up the resource tax rate instead of having it put collectively 

    This idea is based on the fact, that perhaps someone can utilise it to micromanage a specific resource, or customise an alliance economy further. To all those who don't understand, basically, when creating an tax bracket you'll have the option of selecting an individual resource, instead of all of it collectively. So for example:

    You make the general resource tax 0% but create another individual rate for coal being 100%, this would tax only coal and nothing else.

    I'm not sure how it would be formatted within the game to keep it as easy and simple to use as can be, but I'm sure if this is ever implemented (Or not) someone will figure something out. Really this is just a simple suggestion of an edit, that maybe someone can use. Thank you!


    Nice seeing more tax suggestions


    • Upvote 5
  6. Voted for HS, because of what's happening, but my best guess for the future is:

    - When GOONS break off, befriend a powerful alliance (Not BK) or grow powerful themselves 

    All the others have stuck to the NPOsphere for a rather longtime.

    Doubt GPWC is going to break off anytime soon.

    Basically, if GOONS have any ambition they will eventually face NPO.

    bk hahahahha, not anymore



  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.