[And So the Dust Settles]

Well.... I guess....

[War Stats 2.0]

9 hours ago, Pheonix said:

What??? That makes no sense whatsoever. I'm reading through my post and I don't have a clue where I even came close to implying that.

Yeah I got caught up in the moment, I was on a bombing spree and I couldn't stop  luckily they weren't smart enough to remilitarize.

if the mechanics are tilted to where air bombing is the only viable strategy I would say you believe that balance should be achieved among the different attacks.Unless you like it this way i suppose. but why would anyone want it like that?

[War Stats 2.0]

8 minutes ago, Pheonix said:

Finally a halfway decent shit post

Air bombing everything, except soldiers, that would be dumb.

If one military defeats the other military, the one who comes out on top wins, it's a hard concept to understand, I know, but that's the way war works. And if the side with no military doesn't surrender, you beat the shit outta them, and that's what BK is doing rn, beating the shit outta KT & friends, it doesn't matter if someone buys a ship and kills 2.3 infrastructure in a naval invasion, that isn't going to win the war.

So what you are saying is that navy should be allowed to target military units as well? A good concept. 

[War Stats 2.0]

So from what I read here....

 

Air bombing tanks is the way to win a war....

 

Is that right?