Moloko
-
Posts
162 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Moloko
-
-
i clicked the link in the op...... WTF did i just read!!!!!
The great words of a gentleman and a scholar.
-
-
A month before this is even posted some of the UK members got attacked by some of the Porcelain Legion members. It took a PM talk to cool the war down, and eventually end it. I haven't seen anyone from the Porcelain Legion in this thread, yet.
So, instead of blowing up this forum by posting and starting new threads here (when the aggressor have not, or is not seen to be, registered in the forum), privately talk to the aggressors to see if they are in a mood to end the war.
"Blowing up" a forum that's been basically dead for weeks. We're making things happen while the only thing happening to you is getting raided and losing like 100 infra every other day.
Maybe you'd have more fun joining Guardian or SK where you can do nothing for months but watch your score grow and feel like you've won at this game.
-
All I'm going to say is that any members of HSN who have not defended GuN as of yet should not be retaliated against.
Also Bloc, remember who you had your people attack two of our members? That was fun.
We don't like being bullied, and I doubt GuN does either.
If you don't want to be retaliated against then I'm going to give you a friendly warning abandon that sinking ship while you still can.
Why should our people discriminate our attacks when your foolish leaders have dragged your whole alliance to war against us upon a false pretense so that they may act out their aggression against our people?
Why should we show any mercy to those who would work to exterminate the >Bloc race?
To anyone of the HSN reading this who has a heart and holds doubts to the intentions of your leaders understand that there is no G.U.N. They are all inactive and it is impossible for any of them to have signed this sham of a treaty that was only fabricated to attack >Bloc for having a little bit of fun with making a thread about a dead alliance that had been dead for well over a week.
If you want transparent leadership that cares for your nation and would strive not to lead it to ruin as a pawn for it's illicit motives, you know where to come.
-
Good working protecting a dead alliance!
-
1
-
-
You all have fun sorting through what's left after I blasted through most of their infrastructure and saved up cash a week ago and now none of them are in my range anymore.
-
The next update is going to be a good one.
-
The only thing that's come of this is that Guardian needs to reform their inactives.
-
The mecha need faces.
-
By george you're right, I forgot the money total. Updated.
And we should kidnap Cubans and fuse their best genes into the DNA of our own people? Do they have some special gene that prevents birth defects from incest?
Oh that was an absolute mistake. For some reason I was positive you nation was geographically based in Cuba and thus was pointing out that Cubans and most other former Spanish South American colonies are inherently racially impure by those standards because their main ethnicity is being descended from a mixed race. But in any case that really applies to nearly all peoples and the closest you'll probably ever get to racial purity as a human ethnicity is the Japanese.
But cats on the other hand are the most racially pure species of them all.
-
You didn't specify how much grant money there was.
Also to answer the question
>Cuba
>Racially Pure
Good enough?
-
Hm, that's actually quite reasonable points you got there. Back then foot soldiers can only steal miniscule amount of cash, barely comparable to how effective airstrikes were, but now things are different. I'll just wait for Sheepy to decide, then.
Yeah, I'm definitely glad how much ground attacks have been changed since now it's actually possible to not only profit from but base your nation entirely around your military-industrial complex and keep making money from wars and raids, it's just about seeing aircraft being proportionally effective to how good troops and especially tanks are now.
-
I'm not tring to argue anything.....me personally, if someone is in an AA, than it should be hands off.....regardless of a nations activity level. If a nation is not in an AA, then thats their problem, I wouldn't attack them, but I'm not against the raiding of non-AA nations....it is
a game after all. My issue (for lack of a better term), is that you guys claim to have an issue with inactives, don't care about your AA score, but don't seem very interested in booted the inactives you have that you can't attack yourself. I'm sure there are quit a few folks who'd help out with your inactive problem.....but they don't to be the ones to start an inter-AA war. Why not cut yours loose and let them fend for themselves......this way, others in the community can benefit from them......I think that is how it was stated earlier.
Maybe we'd be more supportive of that prospect if even some of the other alliances were willing to do the same, but instead it's dissolved into the best mudslinging event this game has seen in months over how some alliances want to obsessively cling to and fight over their inactive members to keep their score bloated so they can feel important in a second rate nation simulator with a tiny community to rather hilarious effect.
-
1
-
-
Right now it's more effective to just hoard as much foot soldiers as you can and steal all of your enemy's money
And that's pretty much why I think aircraft should be made more useful through these means. They may have been overpowered in the past but as of now there's not much going for them and any slots for more airfields would be better used for more barracks or war industry to support tanks, let alone how it's rarely worth attacking with aircraft as it currently stands.
Pulling back the cost only to 3 points would be a good compromise and would achieve the intended effect that people who keep defensive militaries would have to be more willing to invest in airpower at risk of getting two airstrikes on the opening of a war, which right now would usually be unabated by people in my war range.
-
Complete agreement about the actives, but if you have such a disdain for inactives and don't care about your AA's score, why not boot those 45 inactives from your AA and wash your hands of them. Its pointless to keep them around as meatshields because if another AA were to attack your AA, they wouldn't target any of your "Greys" anyway.
Except it's not pointless to keep them around solely because even if it's unlikely having those meatshields there is better not to have them at all.
You haven't made any argument contrary to farming inactive members and in fact most of the things that you've said have only served to validate that it should be taken for granted that inactives should or at least are open to being attacked without anyone caring about it, supposing that you actually are trying to say otherwise.
-
1
-
-
Recently I'd seen a few comments about how aircraft are mostly not very useful in combat and paired with my own experiences with them I would like to propose a pretty simple way to make them more effective without even needing to do much to adjust how powerful they are.
I think air attacks should be adjusted to only cost 2 action points instead of 4, this would give attackers a lot more options in how to engage in the opening of a war and would generally make air attacks more useful since as of now spending the four actions points usually doesn't seem to be worth it unless you want to whittle down somebody with a much larger army than you and even then that doesn't seem to do very much.
-
Signed.
-
Could do with some editing. Also the way that you name weapons and specifications is slightly autistic and I'd consider it uncreative writing.
Overall 5/10
-
The war machine is awoken.
-
I agree that it'd be a lot better for the game's community and thus do more to keep the game alive by letting the players and alliances handle banking and loaning money.
Really I'm surprised that more alliances haven't actively engaged in much of these actions besides for a few individual players giving out loans here and there.
-
3
-
-
I actually think the boards don't let you log out if you're banned. You'd have to use another browser. As for posting ban appeals, I'm not sure, I believe it's open to banned members to post in but I should probably look into that.
I agree with Drew Pickles that allowing Banned members to read the forum is a good idea.
Banned members are locked out of the forums entirely as is, so the only way to appeal a ban is to either send an email or try IRC if they haven't been banned there as well.
-
1
-
-
That's a lot of trimming on the Bloc side...
And still it only amounts to being set back about a day as far as score growth is concerned.
-
2
-
-
Is Fresno as awful as the reputation that precedes it? I've only stopped through there once.
-
One way this could work is to add a spy agency building or mechanic into the game.
Peace Reigns over >Bloc party and HSN
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
The friendship is worth fifty million at least and that's without considering his amazing talent for Eastern poetry and illustrating cephalopods!