Jaki Stirner
-
Posts
55 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Jaki Stirner
-
-
praise jah
-
We are all imperialists in our hearts
Speak for yourself, pink-skin.
And greed is good. It was selected through evolution.
Collectivism is good. Pro-social behavior was selected though evolution. (What is an appeal to nature)
-
Don't forget that the Congo should get Belgium. I doubt they will be gentle with it, either, all things considered.
-
The extraction of wealth and resources from our great continent by imperial powers must be stopped at once. Reparations must be paid, in the form of white tears.
-
You're just being argumentative for the sake of arguing.
You're welcome for.the name changes and the Nazi situation was addressed and dealt with. Shut up.But in a more respectful tone, seriously Hereno. I actually have respect for you, bit some of the !@#$ you say makes me want to punch the screen.
Do you sincerely have an issue with those things?
The name thing is common sense, and Im not even sure what problem you have with the Nazi issue that was already dealt with.
Somebody's mad. ^
Bit your idea is to simply restrict individualism at this point. You seem to be displaying far more fascism than anyone from NoR.
Anti-fascism is literally fascism, huh? Good to know.
-
You can go into debt currently?
-
Discretion of the game staff in this case was simply giving you a random name instead of deleting your things. As for nazi alliances -- I'm not sure what you're talking about. If you're referring to Nordreich they are not a nazi alliance, but simply a German alliance themed in the past way before the Third Reich. They know very well that Nazism isn't tolerated, and toe the line very carefully.
Yeah, that's how they're allowed to post with SS soldiers in their signatures and post slightly modified Nazi propaganda posters in their recruitment thread, and espouse Nazi rhetoric all over the boards and in RP. Definitely "toeing the line". Definitely "not a nazi alliance". If you know Nordreich from other games, you know that in every single game they've played in, there's eventually a big dramafest when some of their members get outed as prominent members of stormfront, IRL nazi activists/organizers, etc. They're nazis, and it's reprehensible that you're allowing them to shit up your game.
-
1
-
-
Libertarian socialism is objectively better for society than any form of capitalism. It's more equitable, allows for more freedom of choice in workplaces, more freedom of movement and travel, can lead to an increase in production and consumption, and eliminates the parasitic class of capitalists who accumulate wealth while contributing nothing of value to society. You can have your free markets, but profits should be put back into the company or divided amongst all of the workers at a given workplace. I don't support the practice of extracting surplus value and using it to line the pockets of those who are already wealthy. "Ownership" of a business is so abstract - in a capitalist economy, you're essentially paying someone huge amounts of money for occupying the social position of "owner". I don't support hierarchies of any kind in society, but the hierarchy between "owner" and "worker" is so arbitrary and absurd. A capitalist doesn't build a factory or storefront himself, he doesn't produce products himself, he doesn't sell products himself, he doesn't provide any kind of tangible service, and yet for some reason he's the one raking in all the cash. !@#$ that.
-
2
-
-
I mean, you may not care either way, but in reality, the fact you're anti-fa tells me you're an overall negative person in general.
Yeah, being opposed to fascism and racism, that's really negative. The fact that you would say something like that tells me you're reactionary as hell.
-
3
-
-
Why do you care so much about something so irrelevant.
Should guns be banned?
in General Debate
Posted
I would support banning guns as long as that ban applies to police, military, and private security firms. Otherwise, no. It would only serve to enlarge the power imbalance between the governors and the governed.