-
Posts
602 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Bollocks
-
-
Everyone always get a turn at the spanking table
We got it last time and are just returning to the virtuous cycle
-
It’s like what I said last war, HS decided to band wagon into an already humongous dogpile and now they want to pull this BS.
Utterly disgraceful
- 2
-
8 hours ago, Darth Ataxia said:
Too bad, them’s the facts.
Yet the facts are you’re in a lopsided dogpile
and SRD, what was that like 5 years ago; good times
- 1
-
4 hours ago, BigMorf said:
NAP's exist my friend.
Tru - forgot there was another month on it
Anyways my point still stands, why go out of your way to join an already large dogpile when your participation doesn’t sway the outcome one iota
-
Ngl, lost a lot of respect for HS for this move
Why participate in an already crowded dogpile when you have no real axe to grind and fighting an old long time ally?
Even Guardian sat this one out
- 1
- 2
-
Just now, Mayor said:
Honestly how many alliances are needed to take down Fortuna? I mean like everyone, !@#$ Eclipse, but at the end of the day how do people find these kind of wars entertaining is beyond me.
At least Guardian sat this one out
- 1
-
Like I said at the beginning of the war, I give major props to GGO with their well planned and calculated gamble with their limited infra build post last war and coordinated attack 1 turn after DC.
The gambit probably would of worked had it not been the phenomenal coordination on our end, this was the most fun I’ve had in some time.
gg wp
- 3
-
People play these types of games for a long time, a ROI of 1-2 years is not that long in the grand scheme of things. This is not the CoD franchise where the next iteration comes out in 2 years and everyone moves on to the new thing. Not to mention there is no game mechanic where you can actually destroy someone else’s city.
I can’t remember how long I played CN, but it was close to 8 years, and I’m approaching 8 years here; I’m damn glad I passed the 20 city mark eons ago
-
Taking a step back though, this was a pretty commendable action by HOGG
I can appreciate the planning & strategic intent behind it, clearly this was planned immediately after the last war given HOGG’s limited infra rebuild and planned blitz 1 turn after the NAP.
While this is shaping up to be a tactical loss for HOGG, it could be an overall strategic gain checking the growth of an opposing megawhale tier.
This, paired up with the previous separation with TKR has been a very healthy development for the game’s meta.
- 2
-
8 hours ago, Jhonny said:
i've been called countless slurs, derogatory terms, and overall hateful things in my life, but i have never felt as much pain as being called just one of Eclipse's buddies
You’ll always be my buddy, friend
-
17 hours ago, Hodor said:
just madly in love with y'all being so predictable bby *smooches*
Following through on a legit CB?
yeah guilty as charged
-
ITT people who already made up their minds hating tS expressing more elawyer outrage
Such a dead horse
- 5
-
We should set up a formal quarterly alliance swap, guardian for rose; cool?
- 1
-
PnW has finally been blessed by a resident evil 5 themed bloc
-
Mines been going longer than 4hrs
what do
-
Healthy development for the game, kudos
-
Welcome to the new era of bi-polarity
- 1
-
15 hours ago, Buorhann said:
That’s the point. Neither Bloc wanted to stay mil’d up. There were no plans to take aggression.
Both Celest and HW were mil’d up, allegedly, due to paranoia and concern from either Clock chaining or the other respective Bloc making an opportunistic move.
HW and Celest came to an agreement that addresses everything they were concerned about.
And after reading the logs dropped here and being caught up to date on events, I’d say it’s a fair agreement. Not what I would’ve done, but being pragmatic to those currently leading - I think it was a good secured deal.
This.
It was a practical decision , and I would’ve done the same. Even though I do fondly remember the EMC days, the repeated bipolar wars ultimately didn’t help the game’s meta
Similar to a game of Diplomacy where you start with 7 almost but not quite equal parties; reset after a win- I would like to see the top alliances pursue a similar balance of powers approach to the game’s political meta.
A game of diplomacy, after all, is not fun 1v1
- 1
-
Honestly don’t have an issue with this. A war just reinforces bi-polarity. Maybe this opens up enough dialog to shake things up diplomatically
The game’s meta always benefits more from more multi-polarity
- 1
-
GG - wishing you guys a quick rebuild
-
2 hours ago, DukeJustice said:
“The best way to play this game is find a bunch of friends —-“ Alpha description.
who could have guessed . . .
I too like to play with myself
- 1
- 3
-
8 hours ago, Mayor said:
It happens to the best of us.
“I didn’t create these multis, I swear! It was my festering butthurt that spontaneously spawned all of them - it happens to the best of us 🤷♂️“
- Steve
- 2
- 1
- 1
-
Oh hey - it’s like IQ without the IQ
- 5
-
On 9/27/2021 at 9:00 AM, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:
Remember when we used to be allies? those were the days...
We would ask you for help, and you wouldn't do anything.
Honestly?
Barely - must be the heavy drinking lmfao
[DOW] Breaking the News
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
HS !@#$ed around and found out