Jump to content

jimmyvbuck

VIP
  • Posts

    109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by jimmyvbuck

  1. Zero wouldn't complain about it, he would destroy the status quo. 

    You are the definition of a weeb, now calm down meow.

    That is not how politics plays out in this type of game.  It will always resolve to a bi-polar alliance structure.

     

    Congrats to both of you!

    Which I find boring as !@#$ lol

  2. I have given you my conditions and time and time again you have refused them.

    Plus your tax rate is poo poo

    Well our tax rate is probably part of why we are winning, since we can afford to build up people before a war :P 

  3. Cross ties between honorable alliances can work. Treaties with backstabbers are more dicey, it turns out.

    No alliance is perfect, and when you have allies on both sides you are going to piss at least one of them off unless apparently you leak war plans in which case everyone would be happy or something lol.

    • Upvote 1
  4. Let's see if I understand this. Most of us had played nation simulation games for quite a while. (3-10 years).

     

    Yet people still come to the Open World Forum in attempt to tell their version of the truth. Everyone already has a side and knows what party line they're going to support. Is there any benefit to this or do you all just enjoy wasting time in general?

    We play nation sims for years...We obviously like to waste time in general :P 

    • Upvote 2
  5. No. No specifics would have to be given. Just anything that didn't downplay the risk of war.  Allies are usually expected to share things pertinent to the security of the other. Some of our other allies have ties to alliances on the other side too and were a lot more forthcoming.

    Perhaps but TKR is not an ally with ties to the other side, TKR is on the other side, they are in bloc with us ffs lol.

  6. I remember indignation about UPN lying about its plans to allies coming from your corner. Your personal perspective is one thing, but it was all over here.

    From what I remember their lie was a lot bigger than "it will be fine" so I don't think it's the same, similar yes but not the same.

  7. Then you'd be wrong. Basically anything other than "don't worry about it" and then vilifying us for preparing anyway would be fine. 

    Except it would not be fine, since saying anything else would be telling you it was true and you know it, and as I have gone over they could not really just tell you it was true. You can't expect an ally with almost all their ties to the other sphere to tell you everything, you should have known things would end up like this eventually when you signed them but no, you wanted ties to both sides I guess and now it's bitten you in the arse and you are upset at them for it.

    • Upvote 1
  8. I remember BK being pretty upset when its allies got hit by other allies and said they weren't being informed of anything.

    You mean UPN? I personally was more upset that they actually hit our ally (which is why I get why they are also upset), I did not expect them to actually tell us about it. "Oh yeah we are going to go ahead and hit your ally okay?"...I give you examples just so you can see how silly it looks.

    • Upvote 1
  9. You said there was nothing to worry about when asked about BK and others planning to slam us. Could have just said it was the case. We did bring it up.

    I don't think that has ever happened ever. "Oh yeah we have intel that x alliance is going to attack us, is that true?" "Oh yeah that's totally the case" ... I mean really? That is never going to happen unless that guy is either an idiot or a spy.

  10.  At the point where it's obvious, it usually becomes clear to everyone else so lying outright is pretty problematic. Being vilified because people obscured the chronological order of events when we actually went on the intel we had and started preparing for it is also pretty upsetting.

    The fact that you expect them to just up and say "yeah BK is hitting you" is kinda silly tbh. Even if you did think you knew do you think we would like it if they just told you? No, we would not, and nor would you if our positions were reversed.

    • Upvote 3
  11. When it involves us getting hit, yes and when we knew about it anyway, it would have been the sensible move to simply fess up and admit it. It wasn't exactly a close-guarded secret. 

    I actually wonder how often that actually happens with any alliance. I doubt any side would appreciate their war plans being told to the other side even if it may or may not be obvious so blaming them for it seems a little silly to me seeing as doing something like that could easily destroy a war plan and get the ones telling the other side hated depending on how it's done.

  12. Already been done too many times

    What has? We have never once tried to fix anything about the UPN treaty, even after the past issues we never really tried to change anything. BK and UPN seemed fine leaving things the way they were, and may do so again after this.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.