Neo-Nexus
-
Posts
244 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Neo-Nexus
-
-
I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one that finds it outright hilarious when Guardian/SK b*tches about hypocrisy on POW camps and pretty much everything else such as declaring war based on a leader's opinion etc etc.
-
1
-
-
Welcome and good luck!
-
Be careful, that might give my soldiers superpowers.
P.S. Sheepy plz give my soldiers superpowers.
Only if Sheepy gives my planes indestructibility
-
The Leaderboard War,
-
This honestly just sounds like you're not happy that you lost and now you want Sheepy to change the game for you. If you're fighting people without support, then you should join an alliance that doesn't get you steamrolled for its own stupidity.
And you want to add bombing runs and naval hits to the victory counter? Why, so you get to keep your infra? Give me a break. This post is you being butthurt that you lost a war. Nothing else to it.
Beautiful *wipes tears* couldn't have said it better myself
-
Because naval strikes do 2x the damage of missiles, Airstrikes do 1.6x damage to missiles, and you can steal with ground troops, and destroy missiles with spies. You're talking about taking away the last line of defense on the part of people who lost their entire military. You'd basically be beating up someone who has no defense. wars should not go on when there is literally no troops or resources to destroy left. It makes the game less about fun, more about bullying.
Mmmm a member of Guardian lecturing us on bullying
but in all seriousness missiles shouldn't be a last line of defense thing, it's not really even a defense more like a mutually assured destruction. It's basically saying no matter how superior one is from all fronts, planning or strategy I could still lob missiles at you and possibly do more damage. -
1
-
-
Perhaps, by gaining superiority in all fronts you can look at it like you've occupied all their missile facilities and silos? XD
-
1
-
-
I'd support this
-
Those matters are not only incredibly one sided how you are presenting them, but from what I hear I was proven correct in my justification and they got their money's worth from me... but that is no longer none of my business (or yours for that matter). Considering most Rose members either wouldn't know that, or if they were GPA were hardly paragons themselves it's not really worth mentioning. I am aware that it's why you have that ax to grind with me but to state that is the case with everyone else is as you say, pretty clueless.
They got their money's worth from you? Proven by who, yourself? It's not one sided, it is what it is. I highly doubt the GPA takes your tears from your failed coup as a form of payment.
Trust me, I've seen the ways you tried to argue that they got their money's worth lol and it's quite pathetic. Seeing that your trying to lecture us on behavior, yes this is extremely relevant. This lecture is coming from a person with your history, how ironic is it not?
But thanks for trying though
-
I think heating up those tears gives you some salt.
Great for adding some festive flavour to your next great meal.
No need for all that work,
just head over to posts by SK members in the forums. Salt for days.
-
Trolling is something I hear claimed quite a lot from Rose members, but it is objectively false and an obvious attempt to escape facing up to their inefficiencies in arguing a debate. You see, a person getting angry at even my most innocent of comments (even a parody post gets swearing directed my way of course lets not forget) does not mean I "trolled" them into getting angry. It just means they are angry people... among other things I'm not going to bother to go into as its already quite clear.
Yeah, cause trying to overthrow an entire alliance, demanding reps from a nation that "caused you to militarize," refusing to pay back loans, harassing alliances in their own forums is obviously innocent (and I'm pretty sure there are more). If you really think that the community dislikes you cause of your comments, you're pretty clueless.
-
Please stop trying to start something that isn't there.
Then again almost all the stuff you do in this game is either a troll or a total failure :/
-
To be fair, only Rose person I've ever seen be respected by our alliance is Kurdanak. I think Abbas has more respect than half of Rose does do to constant !@#$ that happens between them
1- unreliable coalition partners
2- constant threats made to DEIC in which they were told to back off on more than one occassion
Guess that happens when you try and back stab us...
Okay, and we're the unreliable coalition partners.
Basically, he's trying to say we're "unreliable coalition partners" because:
1. We refused to be your meat shields
2. We're aren't your unwitting pawns
3. We did something when we figured out you were planning on back stabbing us
4. We refused to play your "game"
-
5
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Of course Rose jumps in when we are all beaten down. Let others do your dirty work as usual.
LOL AND THIS IS COMING FROM SK OF ALL ALLIANCES?
What was that thing that involved Rose in your leaked plan again?!
-
13
-
o/ Regicide!
-
First, let me congratulate VE on their announcement. It is well written with just enough show to make it fun. It carries with it a clear message and adds to the character of their alliance. Many of you need to note how to make a proper announcement.
Now I'm going to apologize because I'm going to get a bit off track here:
You, and many others, don't seem to understand that it is possible for alliances to support an environment in which individual members can openly share their opinions, even when they go against the leadership. Yes, Tenages is the King and per our charter he is responsible for the direction of SK as an alliance. As such, it is expected for his voice to be the loudest as it carries the most weight. But to argue against a post that was simply saying the personal opinions of the King do not reflect the opinions of each of our members is idiotic. Likewise, only an inexperienced and fiercely disloyal individual as yourself would ever bring up the idea of leaving an alliance because of a difference in opinion.
Rose is an irrelevant alliance that has proven over and over again how unreliable and ineffective they are. I'd argue their only worthwhile purpose of being here is to be used.
"Dying old guard" is an interesting euphemism. We're days into a conflict and have a spotless track record up this point. Was this pretty? No. But we're dealing a ton of damage and will continue to be a major player in this game long after this war. (Assuming I'm unable to convince Tenages to pull the plug. It's embarrassing to have our community be associated with this game.
) Sadly, it won't even be an achievement. The majority of alliances in this game are complete garbage. There is no competition and the trash community makes it nearly impossible to play politics.So what I'm getting from this is that because you lose one war you guys are going to rage quit. And it's only impossible to play politics for your alliance not for other alliances. Probably because of your tendency to hit alliance after alliance (and planning on backstabbing Rose as well) , no one wants to do politics with you, can you even blame them? You and your alliance put yourselves in this position and now you're actually trying to pass the blame onto the community.
-
1
-
-
You, and many others, don't seem to understand that it is possible for alliances to support an environment in which individual members can openly share their opinions, even when they go against the leadership. Yes, Tenages is the King and per our charter he is responsible for the direction of SK as an alliance. As such, it is expected for his voice to be the loudest as it carries the most weight. But to argue against a post that was simply saying the personal opinions of the King do not reflect the opinions of each of our members is idiotic. Likewise, only an inexperienced and fiercely disloyal individual as yourself would ever bring up the idea of leaving an alliance because of a difference in opinion.
SK should know the consequences of the actions (and words) of a leader. You held GPA to this standard do the same for yourself.
This is disgusting.
-
o/ UPN Good luck out there!
-
-
Good luck o/
-
o/ Best of Luck!
-
World is not safe with SK
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
"Hey world, I know he's our leader and all, but what he says is complete bull !@#$. Well, it's only bull !@#$ when it puts us in a bad light. kbye"
Agree, some leaders can't be assed to go and tell their members everything, much less their allies. Tenages' intentions were not known by anyone in our alliance until they went public.
OBLIGATORY DISCLAIMER
** The views and opinions expressed by Tenages in the screenshots above are not representative of all members of Seven Kingdoms. You should not treat any opinion expressed by Tenages as the general sentiment among SK members, but only as an expression of his opinion. **
That awkward moment when war with an entire alliance is caused by the actions of their leader.... doesn't this sound familiar?
Oh right, you hit GPA with this idea a few months back
-
8
-
1) The Great Orbis Schism
2) The Great Schism
3) The Chain War
4) The War of No Return
5) The Nuclear War
A Guardian Announcement
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
Loyalty to your allies is NOT stupid.
But following them off a cliff is.