Jump to content

Charles Bolivar

Members
  • Posts

    1381
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Charles Bolivar

  1. I would increase the credit cost for forming an alliance to a higher mount to be honest. I think making it more costly for alliances to be founded so as to deter people from making low tier pleb alliances to be a great idea and one which will guide new players into the more established AAs where they can learn how this game truly operates.

     

    Bump it up to 4 or more credits I reckon.

  2. You never beiged or looted TKR during the war. Of the three wars you fought TKR (that are still present on your timeline), you lost 5766 infra and destroyed 563 infra. I wouldn't call that inept at all - even when you were fighting our more raw members (BK knocked you out of range of our most battle hardened veterans). And to clarify: Nemesis is in our protectorate Hogwarts and has never been in TKR :P

    You just had to provide facts to refute his delusions of grandeur and ruin it for everyone didn't you? :P

  3. I'm winning in a sense that my profit is higer than my costs, and that I get what I want out of wars whiel you guys can't stop me. Other than that game is ruined since there is literally nothing else you can do till you guys get of your high throne. You cna't do economy, you can't hug pixels and you can't develope your nation with costly infra, you can't buy new proejcts, since doing that gives you guys all the reasons you need to hit us, which on gmaeplay level sucks. You can say get good all you want but they can't get good when you're deliberatly sabotaging their every attempt at it. That's not how it works.

    My coaliiton? I wasn't aware I was leading coallition, or that I was part of any coalition. My goals alligned with TEst's and to a degree Roz Wei altough they addapted mroe to us than we did to them. There is and never was a coallition, and that's the fantasy you have wich does not manifest in real world. And there are many other misconceptions and fantays you and your side exibits, which are mostly shown in how little you know about anyone outsuide your echochamber that is your sphere adn how easily you fool new palyers with bullshit your side spews about us and rest of game. I never had to lie to get peopel to join my alliance. And through better and worse they stuck with or came and went as they pleased. (menaing, they tried other alliances as well, yet always returned back here, so obviusly we're doing seemthing good).

    Change narrative? I wasn't the one who planned or organized the assult so my goals, as a defender being pressed down by half the game, was "do as much damage as you can", whick I did, acording to stats from war I did most damage from all of Arrgh and it outweigts all the losses I know I took while rebuilding. So in my defensive war, maybe I lost a battle to you, but it wasn't utter failure mind you, but i won the war in the end. You guys obviusly had different objective and you achived that one so you guys won as well, but you winning on your temrs does not mean everyoen else losing on their terms.

    !@#$!@#$!@#$ and so on, please at lest try to speak somewhat undersandable, tired of both you bs and your incompetnece to avoid a simple censorship bot.

     

     

    Funny you say that, sicne attacking TKR and expecting them to be inept is what happened and why I won. Suprisingly The Commonwealth put up a better fight than yoru members at taht level did. Only exception was Smith, who showed briliant tactics and strategy, and even then I almsot caught him by suprise and and won, but alas, Euimr and Commonwealth made it bit harder to pull off everything that I wanted. StilL i bieged TKR's and mensa's guys the most during the war, and TKR was the one cosntantly trying to counter me as well, so you don't have that excuse either. And most beating I took was roudn 1, whick was BKs doing, TKR only went in in 2nd roudn to pick off where BK finished what Alpha begun.

    That's interesting , I didn't know that TKR had surrendered to whoever you are.

     

    Oh wait...They didn't.

  4. "were trying to someone claim" - really superb wording, 9/11 would do again.

     

    Waht about TKR's opportunism to hit Arrgh twice when they were down, don't you think that'll coem to bite you eventually too?

    Damn you autocorrect for ruining my post, now the pirates in a political simulator won't read my post again. Oh the horror and shame.

     

    As for TKR being bit, maybe it will happen, maybe it won't. Hard to tell. Hopefully you do better than you did against Eumir though. Attacking someone and relying upon them to be inept and inactive will be as equally useless against TKR as it was against Eumir.

     

    Obligatory "if you wanna take down TKR first you gotta git gud".

  5. Fun and adventure?

    Literally had a good chuckle when I got on discord and heard you were trying to someone claim I'm butt hurt over something in some piss poor way of making yourself feel good.

     

    Sorry to disappoint but I'm merely pointing out that being opportunistic eventually comes back to bite you in the ass. Case in point, who hasn't given arrgh a beat down at this point as retaliation for raiding?

     

    Whatever works for you I suppose?

    • Upvote 1
  6. Keegoz has done more than you ever will both good and bad here. You're just a casual troll who will never actually matter. Steve ranks higher than you do mate. Keep trying to troll though, I enjoy the basic entry level trolling you're stuck in.

    Inb4 that's bait.

    Someone educate this fool please. He thinks I actually care about who matters in this game's politics or that someone's past achievements are actually relevant somehow.

     

    As for yourself, you are nothing more than the last relic of this game's old guard who survived by hiding away in a paperless part of the web whilst the rest of your fellow old guard members fought and lost. That has now been corrected, I officially welcome you to irrelevance.

     

    That's bait.

  7. Adding onto this:

     

    Lordship stated the war was not about Pantheon.

    IC stated the war was about Pantheon.

    Woot told TKR members that the war was about protecting their protectorates.

    IC told us that the war was not about protecting their protectorates.

    SRD told us that they had no involvement in the initial war plans to hit us.

    Lordship told us GoB jumped at the opportunity to be in the initial war plans against us.

     

    Lies, lies, and more lies.

    Viewpoints and opinions actually but don't let something like that get in the way of your warped narrative.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.