Arln
-
Posts
334 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Arln
-
-
2 minutes ago, hidude45454 said:
E522 may have the hegemony of votes but I propose that the anti-E522 voters change their vote to whatever has the best chance of beating it in the final part of voting. Almost like conglomerating around a united coalition. Wait. this sounds familiar
i support scandals in hollywood but i just moved over to brawlywood to beat the menace
e522s last time!
-
2
-
-
id like to point out that this happened just now. this wasnt special to this war guys.
-
Just now, MinesomeMC said:
i tried to limit by what ive heard people calling it and what upvoting, i didnt see yours while making the list. There were a lot of suggestions.
oops i deleted that post right before you replied lmao. i decided i liked one of these better anyway
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I would like to point out to the mass amount of people who apparently dont like creativity that this error 522 happens everyday now even though the war is over. So uh. Its a pretty stupid event to name the war after an error that happens 1/3 of my log in attempts
-
1
-
21
-
28 minutes ago, hidude45454 said:
omg wtf can't catch a break can they rofl
your flag is trash
*cries
25 minutes ago, MinesomeMC said:You’re right someone who makes good flags is only qualified for that, so anyway WTF has a trash flag
he has a point
53 minutes ago, Nukey6 said:My guy just wrote a legit essay/guide on proper flag design for the sole purpose of ripping into the World Task Force's flag.
lol exactly
-
who are you to tell someone there flag is trash
-
1
-
-
Rip the cool Rohirim theme 😔
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Buorhann said:
Losing isn't the end of the game. People need to understand that it's relatively easy to rebuild.
The game has become pretty casual compared to the old days when it first started.Exactly. Everyone is so scared to lose that they feel the need to bring in non allies. Like why even have treaties if you’re just gonna have other allies.
-
1
-
-
yell at your computer til numbers go up
-
On 9/27/2021 at 9:24 PM, zigbigadorlou said:
Was. Gotta fill the void.
Others are getting around to joining. Don't rush them.
no they better hurry up. im done waiting. we have deadlines to make!
-
8 hours ago, Grave said:
To be fair its not realistic to expect anyone else to do this for the near-future, the surprise factor is gone, you see an odoap and you can assume those two groups will be fighting together in the near future.
If my sphere was suddenly attacked and we were clearly going to lose id rather lose with dignity rather than win because like 3 other spheres jumped in our defense. Separating spheres only works if theyre actually seperated and not just gonna oA in whenever they feel like it. Or come to someones defense
-
you are the only member? The second member is afk....
-
37 minutes ago, Zevari said:
Yeah but if you know you have to pay a 20% tax for one item and a 0% tax for the other, you will most likely produce the 0% taxed one. Plus raws can be sold internally for cheap prices to manufacturing players
Not necessarily would they just completely give up manu and if an alliance feels that way or it actually happens guess what the beautiful thing about this is...
Its optional. Rge option for an alliance to choose what it taxes. Not every alliance is gonna cut off tax of raws so the market will stay in tact.If your alliance wants to keep taxing raws than so be it. Its the beauty of choice to customize your alliances economy the way you see fit.
-
15 hours ago, Zevari said:
That sounds like a great idea to crash the raw market (since players would focus on producing that since it's less taxed)
having alliances dumping stupid high amounts of raws into the market is pretty bad for the market
-
I dont really feel like writing a long philosophical essay on this so ill just put it straight.
I believe alliances should have the option to tax manufactured goods(steel, aluminum, gas, munitions, food) and leave the raw materials(coal, oil, iron, bauxite, lead) alone. Some alliances have no real use of keep fat amounts of raws but need manufactured items on hand.
Thank you that is all
-
2
-
1
-
-
Congrats. Hopefully the future is bright for you.
-
If I am not mistaken Swamp and Hedge signed a temporary ODoAP close to The Ten Day War and when Hedge and Swamp oAed in together it was by an actual treaty.
-
17 hours ago, Krampus said:
-said TKR, after making Quack 2.0 by signing hedgemoney and creating Hollywood.
I remember a lot of whining about Rose from both sides of former Quack. I guess they aren't as bad if you need their help in a war.
separate from above:
You could always have O Levels connecting spheres. People are so concerned with keeping it visually separate on the web but then they still oA in with blocs and alliances not treatied to them or they go in defense of someone. I dont really call it secret treaty per se, but it would be nice if people made their allies a little more visible. Cant call someone a hegemony cuz they have a lot of visible treaties then conjoin multiple blocs with no ties to fight this "hegemony". -
-
we droppin near school(for my pubg mobile guys)
-
6 hours ago, Majima Goro said:
Again, this topic is meant to discuss how to make it such that losing nations can fight back better or get better time to get ready. If you want to discuss about secret treaties, then you should make a new topic. Secret treaties aren't gameplay mechanics, they are a failure of FA
Bro I was drunk when I wrote that post so idk
-
Just now, Cthulu said:
But you downvoted it anyway. lol 😆
Actually i didnt react
-
2
-
-
Ghost Busting
or along those lines due to ghosting claims
*The Ghost Bust
Paranormal Activities-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
I accept these terms
-
4
-
5
Official Petition on War Names - Stop the Errors
in Orbis Central
Posted
Signed,
Arln James Nen
Supreme Leader of Arlania