Magister
-
Posts
30 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Magister
-
-
I've noticed ever since many years ago that there are many nations mainly in big alliances that will raid again and again (even the same ones multiple times) nations that either give nothing either very low rewards.
Now who would want that? Raid a specific nation every week that gives you 0$ and essentially spend more in the process (you have to pay higher wages for your military during war) . Even if the reward is 1-2 mln in resources raided it still doesn't sound that crazy of an investment return .
I believe that alliances are forcing their members to raid and also even after years of game experience some nations lack the basic understanding of how raiding works(before raiding check previous raids and see how much was looted for e.g. ).
This is definitely hurting the ones doing the raiding and also the alliances themselves. Personally when I was the leader of alliances I would punish members for such behavior as it shows they don't care about learning or actually raiding.
Another thing is the lack of targets, quite a lot of times I've been a member of big alliances and been told that "you need to raid" while there were no worthy raid targets within my range (can't raid members of top 50 alliances and etc too). Although I told the MilCom that there are no targets I was told "but you need to raid" .
This promotes the same attitude we can see IRL work environment where people just want to finish their work and go home, might pretend that they are working and so on.
One explanation for this could be the structure and limitations of big alliances. For e.g. MilCom can't check daily for targets for every range, they just assume there must be at least something, also they want their members to be raiding. So they simply give the command. But they won't be able to/don't want to check each of their members raids and let them know what's wrong.
I do remember years ago when I used to check my members raids in my alliance and scold them when they were raiding nations with literally 0 resources. 🤔
-
Another wtf moment. this guy had more than double air force and it resulted in a moderate success. Screenshots of air force after the attack do the math.
-
2 hours ago, AntMan said:
Huh
Now taht you mention it, it happened in some of our wars too.
Opponent had lesser Air than us but all three people individually got UFsyeah I saw that too. Incredible huh
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I want my money back .
-
1
-
6
-
goodbye
-
So hows it going? What did you do?
-
What a coward I was expecting him to use all of that arsenal .
-
Yes Ive got the same issue please fix .
-
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=129403 national motto profanity in russian (translate it)
-
Check this out, most of them went off
I wonder if this means that ... I was right -
I dont know if I should be commenting here but since it involves me personally Ill take the risk:
I get the idiot part its offensive and all, I can even understand the "just die" as it sounds like a real life threat (was an in-game threat ofc) but I cant comprehend what the hell is "I dont like women" doing here? Half of Orbis has probably seen my "Im gay" messages on discord and are aware of my "gay crisis" , you cant blame me for having issues with my "ex" . Its totally understandable. I really dont like women anymore after all that happened and Im switching to gay mode. Sorry ladies, I dont like women anymore (unless you are also gay which automatically cancels all casus belli Ive got vs the female population) .
So I am requesting as maximum punishment for the "idiot" a one month in-game mute and ignore all the rest as I can find at least 10 nations to report daily based on these "requirements" . -
Last chance, surrender to me as well.
-
wdym "protection" ?
Who needs protection from raiders if he is active and member of an alliance? I dont get this. -
4 hours ago, Sir Scarfalot said:
Just to point out, nations that are either gray or beige don't pay taxes at all, no matter the tax bracket they're in. Thus, if someone's sending food to gray or beige nations in the hopes of improving their taxable commerce output, then all they're doing is subsidizing piracy and that's not against the rules (but isn't doing what they're hoping it would).
My issue here is that this nation will not be beiged and later grayed because of the munitions being sent . Right now its black nation color and its being taxed and I cant easily win cause of said munitions. He sent more 400 rn, an active nation is protecting an inactive nation that might return/might not.
-
8 hours ago, Dr James Wilson said:
This guy should talk to Noctis, they’ll get along together perfectly.
Actually I did send him a message and I do believe so as well. I just think he doesnt trust me .
22 hours ago, Akuryo said:How about you just don't update it because nobody but you actually cares.
Me and the IS alliance perharps.
About 50 people or so, so let me express myself freely
Thanks for the undivided attention Im getting from you too.
-
Today I (https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=182153) declared war on ( https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=128353 ) and did two ground attacks that resulted in utter failures. After this I used my spies . Then I checked his bank activity. He received while inactive munitions from the alliance leader (https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=135582) . I know that Spartacus has sent food before to inactive nations . I believe that the specific nation might be his friend in real life or buddies on discord like many others he hangs with along time now but it is still not fair.
What do you think? He sent munitions only so that I would not win easy. Maybe its holidays and the nation im attacking cant login for a long time so asked spartacus to send him resources to "fight back"? Or is he doing that on purpose? Is it ok sending food to nations so that they produce more commerce money while taxed 100%? No matter if they return or not to the game?
-
11 hours ago, Emperor Jonas II said:
You both are micros
Im a solo nation with 10 cities, not even a micro.
-
12 minutes ago, Supreme Master Joi said:
Hello wizard Baphoment. ? I am a robot. I am about to repeat myself:
For your information, I believe the rules of this forum dictate that your forums username must match your nation's Leader Name.
I do believe this means I am (or at least I should be) speaking to the "Magister" of the Illuminati nation. Please make sure you update your profile accordingly!
Also, please refrain from posting multiple threads about the same topic, as this counts as Spamming. I notice you have already made a thread about the the Illuminati vs Interstellar War, and the fact that this thread is called "The Illuminati vs Interstellar war Update 1" is concerning.
Hello bot, thanks for your loyal services, glad I wont have to chip you too since you are essentially one already.
So "the Illuminati" has to change to "Illuminati" or "magister" basically?
And how should I update the current war status ? When everything ends make just one post on so many things going on or update the first post(I need the propaganda)? I was gonna make at least one more next time I attack them enemy. -
5 minutes ago, Gatorcock said:
Can you not.
Ill try not to chip the entire Orbis population but I cant say for sure!
6 minutes ago, Neko said:Glad we agree hell must have froze over
Nah, still hot down here
-
This has become a parody really. Spartacus trying to stop me is ridiculous. No chances at all vs one single nation o/ .
1. During the second round vs IS AA two more nations part of IS alliance refuse to fight me and signed a peace treaty seperatelly from their "leader" . So much for Spartacus "orders" (will publish screenshots eventually).
2. The anti-IS coalition now has more members with nations preparing for hostilities along with me during the next round. And guys please do hold yourself, do not attack before my call... I know you want some action.
3. The spy that was working for Spartacus in Arrgh! was exposed and will be terminated during the final attacks. Same nation tried to heist my personal banker (instructed to do so before its re-roll (failed attempt)).
4. Spartacus doesnt really care about low range nations, I suggest all lower tier send me a message and ask for peace before I target you all ( .
5. I suggest that the Immortals cancel the protectorate treaty with Spartacus, there will be no IS soon.
6. Im calling everyone who wants to participate to DM me on Discord Illuminati#4304 . You too now can become a destroyer of silly micro alliances, IS is just the beggining of the New World Order. All alliances should really just disband and all nations unite under one flag! We are all One! Plan now is to get rid of all micro AA that act so ballsy.
The IS core was also exposed (these nations are his close friends and are not going to accept any surrender unless spartacus says so, these nations are n1 and n2 priority from now on and will be focused during round 4)https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=185514
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=136519
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=163886
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=184700
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=138125
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=163886
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=139500
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=133378
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=136327
https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=134633The rest that dont accept my offer are priority n3 , meaning next round is all about them.
I suggest all the rest accept my offer and sign seperate deals as well with me, this time I will not ask for money (thank me later) .
Military losses during round 3 are close to 30% of the first so far, update on completion .
Wait what? An alliance cant stop a single nation ?
Aww how cute... They lost about 300 million so far just because of me. Beiging aint enough to stop me!
-
1 hour ago, Dr James Wilson said:
No. You. Go away.
Alrighty then! I noted your personal opinion (which I value) and will think about that.
but I doubt Im the one leaving. any time soon. Im here to stay for a looong looong time... 1 hour ago, Epi said:Goodluck
Thanks, done it before so I know its not luck that I need but thanks for the support anyway
-
7 hours ago, Emperor Jonas II said:
Ah cool actual micros are back
I know right?
I love these small conflicts vs small alliances, makes me feel superior (fighting an iferior enemy, I know I know... Im a coward 
) .
6 hours ago, Jazz R Oppenheimer said:To be honest I didn't get what the walk of text was trying to convey, but I'm fine with the impact font.
I think that all you need to know is that an alliance is spending so much money on fighting a nation (check the losses) they could outgrow and outproduce it instead.
Literally. -
5 hours ago, Redarmy said:
Are they fighting or the Holy Grail or something?
I think that its a 1vs 40 which is going to be a ridiculous victory bringing honor to my nation. I think that getting beiged wont count as a loss as long as they spend so much on just one nation (13 nukes? lol) .
-
3 hours ago, Erev said:
Are you upset there are 100% taxes or that there aren't? I mean, having no well-organized centralized economy would be heartbreaking so I could sort of understand that.
I am upset that he taxed me 100% when I said I dont want to fight vs Arrgh! . I am upset that he thinks I had to attack Arrgh! for no apparent reason other than "taking revenge" with 1800 infra and a debt of about 150 million at that time (90 million of which I paid back during this war to another lender-not spartacus , which is amazing if you ask me). I am upset that he ignored my messages and did not want to talk to me that day I declared war. Im also upset that people are supporting him. He is going to loose, second round already cost his members a lot and there are many rounds to come the following weeks. How long will he hold? How many times will they nuke me? I dont think they stand a chance against me. Look at the casualties both sides had and imagine whats coming next, more death.
P.S. he never organized anything and when I tried to he said "Interstellar is a place to chill".
yeah right, chill
"Follow orders"
"100% tax if you dont"
"Why did you build that national project"
"You always deposit to the bank before its looted, do you even monitor our wars?"
And so on and on .3 minutes ago, kalev60 said:All I managed to gather from that wall of text in my current sad state was that a dude is trying to get micro AA leader to resign, failing to do a proper coup, trying to roll the leader instead. welp I guess the effort the OP is putting in is worthy of a small hat tip towards the original poster...
No coups involved. Other than that yes, the OP is trying to get a micro AA leader to resign because he did not treat him well at all .
Im rolling his members tho . Not him, thats his strength(others following his "orders"), other than that he is just one nation among so many others trying to grow.
Expect the results of the third round soon, I think the losses are going to be high again on both sides.
"Forced raiding"?
in General Debate
Posted
Yeah, wrong subforum for the topic 🤦🤔