Jump to content

Should Pornography Be Banned?


Guest hawkeye
 Share

Recommended Posts

ITT Virgin talks about sex like an expert

  • Upvote 1

☾☆

Priest of Dio


º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR DIO BRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¸ DIO BRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸

6m0xPQ1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

christianity doesn't harm people, sex does

 

sex leads to

 

1. Rape

2. AIDS

3. Child Molestation

4. Homosexuality

5. Unwanted Babies

 

this has caused many problems throughout history.

I'm gay and have never had sex in my life. :P

Humans cannot create anything out of nothingness. Humans cannot accomplish anything without holding onto something. After all, humans are not gods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do you choose to be gay?

Gay is the way 2 play.

Don't be a pain, just hop on the !@#$ train.  :sheepy:

There's plenty of luv to go around.  :wub:

  • Upvote 1

tumblr_m9czr1koad1rutbklo1_5002_zpsgrmgw


Drip, drip, drop


ヽ( 。ヮ゚)ノ "Jump on the crazy brain gravy train!" (。□゚ノ)ノ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do you choose to be gay?

Okay, like seriously, do you realize there have been hundreds of studies that have concluded again and again that homosexuality is ultimately determined by genetics and neural development?

 

The only reason for people to cling to the idea that homosexuality is chosen is to scrape up some excuse to justify the "they're wrong, I'm right" religious idea. Ticks me off when people blatantly ignore science and data just because they prefer their beliefs over learning.

"Bibant, quoniam edere nolunt." ~ "Let them drink, since they do not wish to eat."

003.png.dec0ea9eb3902372b8bbca44165b588f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, like seriously, do you realize there have been hundreds of studies that have concluded again and again that homosexuality is ultimately determined by genetics and neural development?

 

The only reason for people to cling to the idea that homosexuality is chosen is to scrape up some excuse to justify the "they're wrong, I'm right" religious idea. Ticks me off when people blatantly ignore science and data just because they prefer their beliefs over learning.

You should realize religious zealots/trolls dont listen to reasoning or science. Edited by Olivier Mira
  • Upvote 1

PoJQyFJ.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should realize religious zealots/trolls dont listen to reasoning or science.

Precisely. That's what ticks me off. It wouldn't bother me so much if they familiarized themselves with research and found legitimate reasons to support their beliefs. Instead we simply see "I don't understand it, therefore God."

 

Edit: I feel more hostile than usual right now, haha, but I think it's high time that someone be frank about some of this nonsense, to be honest.

Edited by Roma

"Bibant, quoniam edere nolunt." ~ "Let them drink, since they do not wish to eat."

003.png.dec0ea9eb3902372b8bbca44165b588f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should realize religious zealots/trolls dont listen to reasoning or science.

Precisely. That's what ticks me off. It wouldn't bother me so much if they familiarized themselves with research and found legitimate reasons to support their beliefs. Instead we simply see "I don't understand it, therefore God."

 

Edit: I feel more hostile than usual right now, haha, but I think it's high time that someone be frank about some of this nonsense, to be honest.

I could sit here and easily say all atheists are !@#$ who don't respect religious beliefs. 

 

​Stereotyping is bad. 

NODOLsmall.png.a7aa9c0a05fa266425cd7e83d8ccb3dd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could sit here and easily say all atheists are !@#$ who don't respect religious beliefs. 

 

​Stereotyping is bad. 

That wouldn't matter much to me because I don't happen to be atheist. And although I agree some atheists have a habit of mocking religious people, I am convinced from experience that highly religious people have a much more significant tendency to point fingers. For example: http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/indiana-public-school-punishes-7-year-old-with-banishment-for-not-believing-in-god-lawsuit/

 

It would not be so problematic if that brand of religion were not so common. For example, that "stereotype" wouldn't apply so much to European Christians - for the most part, or at least to a far greater extent than in the United States, religious communities tend to have a much more open view of science and ideas like homosexuality. Even in Spain and Portugal, where Catholicism is an integral part of cultural life, most people tend to find no interest in the stricter religious rejections of modern science and political ideals (which I learned from one of my former Spanish teachers, who was from Alicante). In contrast, here in the United States, highly religious communities make up a significant portion of the population and are a very loud voice that consistently argues against scientific findings pertaining to evolution, astrophysics, homosexuality and other gender dynamics, and so forth.

 

So, stereotyping? Perhaps, I will not argue otherwise. But the one thing I think is more important is that the huge group of Americans that fits that description has done nothing yet to falsify that stereotype, not even slightly.

"Bibant, quoniam edere nolunt." ~ "Let them drink, since they do not wish to eat."

003.png.dec0ea9eb3902372b8bbca44165b588f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could sit here and easily say all atheists are !@#$ who don't respect religious beliefs.

 

​Stereotyping is bad.

I only stereotype American Christianity.

 

I have friends that believe in Christianity who dont act like the enmasses christians in America.

 

I never said all religious organizations or all religious individuals is bad.

 

I just pointed out religious zealots and should have added extremists.

 

>inb4 I get called a godless communist.

  • Upvote 1

PoJQyFJ.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever godless communist.

you're being pretty hard on the communists, I mean even Soviet Russia had porn.

  • Upvote 1

Humans cannot create anything out of nothingness. Humans cannot accomplish anything without holding onto something. After all, humans are not gods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only stereotype American Christianity.

 

>inb4 I get called a godless communist.

Wow, be that way. Just know that we will get you, you godless commie. 

 

EDIT: Hey guise 

Guise

Did you see

Guise listen

Did you ever bother to unscramble Hawkeye's nation name? 

Arovian

Flip the "ar" and "ov" 

Edited by WISD0MTREE

NODOLsmall.png.a7aa9c0a05fa266425cd7e83d8ccb3dd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, be that way. Just know that we will get you, you godless commie. 

 

EDIT: Hey guise 

Guise

Did you see

Guise listen

Did you ever bother to unscramble Hawkeye's nation name? 

Arovian

Flip the "ar" and "ov"

 

ravo-560-05.jpg

 

 

Peace will never be accomplished without war, but war cannot happen without peace.... or something like that idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I do, and probably a lot. The first widespread periodic publications other than newspapers (unless you'd count almanacs, but I would not since those were not distributed as widely) were catalogs in the United States sent out to sell farming utensils, equipment, and (perhaps most of all) clothing to families settling the western states in the 1850s through maybe the 1880s. "Magazines" already existed by that point, but they were scarcely any different from newspapers.

 

I am glad you narrowed down your definition and timeline.  Porn was produced and distributed almost as soon as a medium became availible to do so.  This includes magazines with mass publication and distribution beginning in the 1870s.  The French ruled this initial push.

 

Would you like to pay me in real monies or in game monies?

  • Upvote 1

-signature removed for rules violation-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest hawkeye

So are going to ban male gay porn too?  No women to be "oppressed" there.  Just curious.  I'm sure no one is worried about objectifying a man.

homosexuality spreads aids and should be banned as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homosexuality spreads aids and should be banned as well

Heres an idea......lets just ban sex altogether! We don't need it. Procreation you say, well, if God wants the human race to continue, he'll just have to perform more "Immaculate Conceptions". This will solve everything......case closed!

  • Upvote 1

X4EfkAB.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homosexuality spreads aids and should be banned as well

Uuuggghhhh, my aching head....

 

Heterosexuality spreads AIDS too, but that's no reason to ban it.

  • Upvote 1

"Bibant, quoniam edere nolunt." ~ "Let them drink, since they do not wish to eat."

003.png.dec0ea9eb3902372b8bbca44165b588f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are getting baited by a troll too easily.

But it's so hard to find good entertainment these days, and the Republican debates aren't until later today.

Edited by Roma
  • Upvote 1

"Bibant, quoniam edere nolunt." ~ "Let them drink, since they do not wish to eat."

003.png.dec0ea9eb3902372b8bbca44165b588f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.