Shellhound Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 Pretty sure innocent nations attempting to leave are already being hunted down and punished without GPA lifting a finger. I wonder when Don Juan's scheduled to be hit. Obvious trolling was obvious Sam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khestra Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 After reading all this, my opinion of Guardian and TEst is actually much lower than my opinion of GPA. Well done. After reading this, my opinion is that you are illiterate and therefore incapable of having a viable opinion based on anything transmitted via the written word. Have someone read this to you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Brother Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 After reading this, my opinion is that you are illiterate and therefore incapable of having a viable opinion based on anything transmitted via the written word. Have someone read this to you. ..Yeah, clearly I didn't think it was possible, but you've lowered it even further. Quite impressive, let's see if you can keep it up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I'm sure people have their reasons for wanting to hit GPA, I'm sure GPA will be fine long term regardless of the result of the war, and I'm sure many pixels will be shed by all. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George W. Bush Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 Well this is uhhh... Yeah !@#$ this I'm going back to watching March Madness 3 Quote You're no longer protecting the II? We have still teamed with II and TAC (and others) to rival The Covenants. This is getting complex. #FA_Problems Big problems for TSG. Really, not kidding. If Casey and Cyradis are King and Queen does that mean they're married? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vonnorman Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 This game is awesome, war is fast to rebuild from fun to partake in and noone is immortal why not just have fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pwnius Scrubius Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I am absolutely flabbergasted that there is a 63-man conspiracy. Maybe GPA didn't spy, but it got a whistleblower. I could see it happening. Well anyways, this is frightening. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNG Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I am absolutely flabbergasted that there is a 63-man conspiracy. Maybe GPA didn't spy, but it got a whistleblower. I could see it happening. Well anyways, this is frightening. Well, it isn't that shocking when you remember that those same three alliances plus Rose planned the Marionette War for over a month before the actual event, and it never leaked. Granted, luck had a roll in it, and most people figured out something was coming before, but if in fact a war was being planned now, then I'm frankly more surprised GPA found out than that it was a secret for some time. Quote "They say the secret to success is being at the right place at the right time. But since you never know when the right time is going to be, I figure the trick is to find the right place and just hang around!" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <Kastor> He left and my !@#$ nation is !@#$ed up. And the Finance guy refuses to help. He just writes his !@#$ plays. <Kastor> And laughs and shit. <Kastor> And gives out !@#$ huge loans to Arthur James, that !@#$ bastard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 Well, it isn't that shocking when you remember that those same three alliances plus Rose planned the Marionette War for over a month before the actual event, and it never leaked. Granted, luck had a roll in it, and most people figured out something was coming before, but if in fact a war was being planned now, then I'm frankly more surprised GPA found out than that it was a secret for some time. It's not all that different from then, both were revealed very close to the war since the closer it gets the more people know and the more potential leaks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magicboyd25 Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I am absolutely flabbergasted that there is a 63-man conspiracy. Maybe GPA didn't spy, but it got a whistleblower. I could see it happening. Well anyways, this is frightening. I am flabbergasted that it is only 63 people Based off of what i see everywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apeman Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 Just to help secure the number, whoever doesnt like GPA shall count here. Ill start 1 for the neutral menace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rapmanej Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I am absolutely flabbergasted that there is a 63-man conspiracy. Maybe GPA didn't spy, but it got a whistleblower. I could see it happening. Well anyways, this is frightening. how? neutrals screw this game up. It's called Politics and war. None of this pansy crap. And here we have fake-neutrals. Roll them all on principle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tali Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 U wot m8? Wana go m8? Wut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apeman Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 U wot m8? Wana go m8? neutrality at its finest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rapmanej Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 (edited) U wot m8? Wana go m8? quote makes the point of the thread. nicely done. If you really "want to go" , then why are you in the pansy alliance? Edited March 23, 2015 by rapmanej Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rapmanej Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 The aggression is so high in this thread. I swear, it's quite concerning. Go OD on chill pills or something. U wot m8? Wana go m8? I know right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo-Nexus Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) how? neutrals screw this game up. It's called Politics and war. None of this pansy crap. And here we have fake-neutrals. Roll them all on principle. You state neutrals screw this game up, but then you say we're fake neutrals... so technically in your eye's we're not neutrals since we're "fake neutrals" meaning that us "fake neutrals" aka non-neutrals are not responsible for "screwing this game up" as the people screwing this game up (based on what you just said) are real- actual neutrals, not us "fake neutrals." Riiight?! Edited March 23, 2015 by Neo-Nexus 1 Quote Concilium Populusque Mandalórus ("The Council and the People of Mandalore") : Carter and me have nukes, and Saxplayer is just sassy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rapmanej Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) You state neutrals screw this game up, but then you say we're fake neutrals... so technically in your eye's we're not neutrals since we're "fake neutrals" meaning that us "fake neutrals" aka non-neutrals are not responsible for "screwing this game up" as the people screwing this game up (based on what you just said) are real- actual neutrals, not us "fake neutrals." Riiight?! But your're hiding behind the neutrality label. So, you are non-neutral pansies who are hiding behind the neutral label. Thus, GPA is worse. At least actual neutrals have the integrity to admit their neutrality. And the fact that your alliance has already dropped 7K strength without a shot fired does not speak very highly of GPA's fortitude. Edited March 23, 2015 by rapmanej Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo-Nexus Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) But your're hiding behind the neutrality label. So, you are non-neutral pansies who are hiding behind the neutral label. Thus, GPA is worse. At least actual neutrals have the integrity to admit their neutrality. Whether this is true or not, you admit that we are "non-neutral pansies" (hiding behind neutrality). Based on what you just said you therefore contradict your own statement when pinning the idea "that neutrals ruin the game" on the GPA as based on what you said we're not neutral and it is the neutrals who ruin the game. Idrc if you think the GPA is good, bad, or horrible, )it's beside the point I'm trying to make) but based on your statements you cannot pin "neutrals are ruining this game" on the GPA as technically in your own words we are "non-neutral pansies" Edited March 23, 2015 by Neo-Nexus Quote Concilium Populusque Mandalórus ("The Council and the People of Mandalore") : Carter and me have nukes, and Saxplayer is just sassy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rapmanej Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 Whether this is true or not, you admit that we are "non-neutral pansies" (hiding behind neutrality). Based on what you just said you therefore contradict your own statement when pinning the idea "that neutrals ruin the game" on the GPA as based on what you said we're not neutral and it is the neutrals who ruin the game. Idrc if you think the GPA is good, bad, or horrible, but therefore based on your statements you cannot pin "ruining the game" on the GPA In retrospect, the better term is pseudo-neutral. And good job admitting the GPA is actually pseudo-neutral, well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo-Nexus Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) In retrospect, the better term is pseudo-neutral. And good job admitting the GPA is actually pseudo-neutral, well done. No where have I admitted that GPA is non neutral. These are your words I'm using, you're perspective. No where in my quotes have I voiced my opinion on whether GPA is non-neutral/ pseudo-neutral etc. And plus pseudo-neutral =non-genuine neutral= non neutral, and therefore my argument still applies, changing the word doesn't change how you're contradicting yourself. And lol "And good job admitting the GPA is actually pseudo-neutral, well done. that obvious attempt to change the subject since you know you're cornered Edited March 23, 2015 by Neo-Nexus Quote Concilium Populusque Mandalórus ("The Council and the People of Mandalore") : Carter and me have nukes, and Saxplayer is just sassy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rapmanej Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) No where have I admitted that GPA is pseudo neutral. These are your words I'm using, you're perspective. No where in my quotes have I voiced my opinion on whether GPA is non-neutral/ pseudo-neutral etc. And plus pseudo-neutral =non-genuine neutral= non neutral, and therefore my argument still applies, changing the word doesn't change how you're contradicting yourself. Because you seem so intent on playing this ridiculous game, let me spell it out for you. All neutral alliances should be rolled, because they ruin the game. The GPA calls themselves neutral, so therefore, this is one of the reasons GPA should be rolled. A second reason GPA should be rolled is because they are pseudo-neutral, i.e. hiding behind the neutrality label because they are too scared to defend themselves. My usage of the term psuedo-neutral means: Any non-neutral alliance, that hides behind a neutral label because they are too afraid to show their real colors. It does not simply mean "a non-neutral alliance" Edited March 23, 2015 by rapmanej Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Printer635 Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) A second reason GPA should be rolled is because they are pseudo-neutral, i.e. hiding behind the neutrality label because they are too scared to defend themselves. So you're saying everyone that deserted the GPA when threatened is pseudo-neutral but everyone who is staying to defend the GPA is truly neutral? Edited March 23, 2015 by Printer635 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shellhound Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 So you're saying everyone that deserted the GPA when threatened is pseudo-neutral but everyone who is staying to defend the GPA is truly neutral? Lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo-Nexus Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) All neutral alliances should be rolled, because they ruin the game. My usage of the term psuedo-neutral means: Any non-neutral alliance, that hides behind a neutral label because they are too afraid to show their real colors. It does not simply mean "a non-neutral alliance" So my understanding that non-neutrals DO NOT ruin the game, whereas neutrals ruin the game as it does not promote war, hence the "it's called politics and war" comment made by you. Yet the GPA is a non-neutral alliance that hides behind the neutral label based on your use of the word psuedo alliance. So what I'm getting at is that your opinion (emphasis on the your opinion) is that the GPA is super aggressive and is trying to start wars since we only HIDE behind the neutral label. But yet your first/main reason to roll the GPA is on the basis that we don't to start/participate in wars and therefore ruining the game? I don't see what the problem is here lol. So is the GPA aggressive and contribute to the game (non-neutral) or is the GPA a neutral alliance that ruins the game? Make up your mind Edited March 23, 2015 by Neo-Nexus 1 Quote Concilium Populusque Mandalórus ("The Council and the People of Mandalore") : Carter and me have nukes, and Saxplayer is just sassy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.