[DoE / Peace] Introducing… Tulip

[Mohammad]

Goodbye Piggy 

[Ronjoy Tehmina]

Piggy was the only IC poster apart from Hatebi who was actually fun. You'll be missed. 😔

[Rageproject]

1 hour ago, Corvidae said:

Not to deride a peace agreement but referencing the posting here, you guys fought for exactly 30 days and signed into a Non-Aggression pact for four months.

Locking up 1/4th of the [active] game into a NAP for a third of the year from less-than-a-month of fighting is cowardly and frankly plays more into Rose's hands than the alleged victor's.

 

I know people rarely care, especially gov who are ditching the game anyway, but it's sad to see careless peace deals like these. NAPs set the stage for stagnant politics by removing potential coalitions or partnerships within specific windows, it takes the dynamism out of the game and creates an environment where your incentive to fight a war is not in an interesting CB but rather in the end result of guaranteed safe growth for X months.

Here's the kicker though: Safely growing in perpetuity is killing this game, the same way the lack of updates coming from the dev team are.

 

Congrats on an interesting war bookended by a poorly-thought peace deal.

Signed: the alliance which hasn’t fought since October 2024 and has no NAPs….

To be a bit more serious, take a look at the alliances on Rose’s side which fought over 50% of the last 12-months. And take a look at the collective alliances that fought in this war, which is something to applaud for the amount of activity and engagement.

4-months of an NAP sounds excessive when it’s not your side that has been grinding through all that. 

[George Clooney]

1 hour ago, Corvidae said:

Not to deride a peace agreement but referencing the posting here, you guys fought for exactly 30 days and signed into a Non-Aggression pact for four months.

Locking up 1/4th of the [active] game into a NAP for a third of the year from less-than-a-month of fighting is cowardly and frankly plays more into Rose's hands than the alleged victor's.

 

I know people rarely care, especially gov who are ditching the game anyway, but it's sad to see careless peace deals like these. NAPs set the stage for stagnant politics by removing potential coalitions or partnerships within specific windows, it takes the dynamism out of the game and creates an environment where your incentive to fight a war is not in an interesting CB but rather in the end result of guaranteed safe growth for X months.

Here's the kicker though: Safely growing in perpetuity is killing this game, the same way the lack of updates coming from the dev team are.

 

Congrats on an interesting war bookended by a poorly-thought peace deal.

In other words, "not to deride a peace agreement but I'm going to deride the peace agreement and take a dump on it, congrats." 🙄

We appreciate your concern.  It's been a while since you were part of a properly executed war plan, or hell, even won a war.  So I'll forgive you for being naive as to what happens next.  But people who don't have a death wish don't keep fighting needlessly for months on end.  That's been tried.  It hurts the game more than helps it.

[SleepingNinja]

50 minutes ago, Rageproject said:

Signed: the alliance which hasn’t fought since October 2024 and has no NAPs….

To be a bit more serious, take a look at the alliances on Rose’s side which fought over 50% of the last 12-months. And take a look at the collective alliances that fought in this war, which is something to applaud for the amount of activity and engagement.

4-months of an NAP sounds excessive when it’s not your side that has been grinding through all that. 

 

[SeedHunter]

I was just getting worked up 😀 

Also love the rebrand ❤️

[Sketchy]

2 hours ago, Corvidae said:

Not to deride a peace agreement but referencing the posting here, you guys fought for exactly 30 days and signed into a Non-Aggression pact for four months.

Locking up 1/4th of the [active] game into a NAP for a third of the year from less-than-a-month of fighting is cowardly and frankly plays more into Rose's hands than the alleged victor's.

 

I know people rarely care, especially gov who are ditching the game anyway, but it's sad to see careless peace deals like these. NAPs set the stage for stagnant politics by removing potential coalitions or partnerships within specific windows, it takes the dynamism out of the game and creates an environment where your incentive to fight a war is not in an interesting CB but rather in the end result of guaranteed safe growth for X months.

Here's the kicker though: Safely growing in perpetuity is killing this game, the same way the lack of updates coming from the dev team are.

 

Congrats on an interesting war bookended by a poorly-thought peace deal.

[Chima]

YAM 

[ranoss]

1 hour ago, SleepingNinja said:

 

"not that much?" you're just doing it wrong then 

[Jeric]

2 hours ago, George Clooney said:

In other words, "not to deride a peace agreement but I'm going to deride the peace agreement and take a dump on it, congrats." 🙄

We appreciate your concern.  It's been a while since you were part of a properly executed war plan, or hell, even won a war.  So I'll forgive you for being naive as to what happens next.  But people who don't have a death wish don't keep fighting needlessly for months on end.  That's been tried.  It hurts the game more than helps it.

Noplt still gives me nightmares.....

[Xyion_Choi]

[Xyion_Choi]

😎

Edited April 30 by Xyion_Choi
Dissolve copy

[Firwof Kromwell]

1 hour ago, Jeric said:

Noplt still gives me nightmares.....

gramps needs his ptsd meds again...🤪

passes blunt & captain morgan😉

[Vengeance]

what did I do

[Velyni Vas]

Congrats on peace guys! It was a pleasure fighting and peace talks went smooth. 

[MinesomeMC]

Its nice to have a GATO W before I retire 🙏🏼 was wonderful working with my Allie’s and coalition mates 

[boppy]

11 hours ago, Corvidae said:

Not to deride a peace agreement but referencing the posting here, you guys fought for exactly 30 days and signed into a Non-Aggression pact for four months.

Locking up 1/4th of the [active] game into a NAP for a third of the year from less-than-a-month of fighting is cowardly and frankly plays more into Rose's hands than the alleged victor's.

 

I know people rarely care, especially gov who are ditching the game anyway, but it's sad to see careless peace deals like these. NAPs set the stage for stagnant politics by removing potential coalitions or partnerships within specific windows, it takes the dynamism out of the game and creates an environment where your incentive to fight a war is not in an interesting CB but rather in the end result of guaranteed safe growth for X months.

Here's the kicker though: Safely growing in perpetuity is killing this game, the same way the lack of updates coming from the dev team are.

 

Congrats on an interesting war bookended by a poorly-thought peace deal.

 

Edited April 30 by boppy

[Firwof Kromwell]

3 hours ago, Velyni Vas said:

Congrats on peace guys! It was a pleasure fighting and peace talks went smooth. 

smooth is a overstatement 

also passes you blunt & captain Morgan 

you know you need it

[Greggs]

A pleasure lying with you all, I look forward to lying again in future

Edited April 30 by Greggs

[Williamson]

Hope all have a good peace. This was one of the more fun wars to be honest. Stayed interesting the entire time 🫶❤️

[Insert Name Here]

Congrats to Camelot on their victory.

I wish Camelot a swift rebuild after their defeat.

[kalev60]

I for one are tired of such short naps, so everyone wake me up when September ends , please!... , seriously get off my lawn, it´s nap time...  Congrants to everyone involved , it was fun .... 

[Eumirbago]

18 hours ago, Corvidae said:

Not to deride a peace agreement but referencing the posting here, you guys fought for exactly 30 days and signed into a Non-Aggression pact for four months.

Locking up 1/4th of the [active] game into a NAP for a third of the year from less-than-a-month of fighting is cowardly and frankly plays more into Rose's hands than the alleged victor's.

 

I know people rarely care, especially gov who are ditching the game anyway, but it's sad to see careless peace deals like these. NAPs set the stage for stagnant politics by removing potential coalitions or partnerships within specific windows, it takes the dynamism out of the game and creates an environment where your incentive to fight a war is not in an interesting CB but rather in the end result of guaranteed safe growth for X months.

Here's the kicker though: Safely growing in perpetuity is killing this game, the same way the lack of updates coming from the dev team are.

 

Congrats on an interesting war bookended by a poorly-thought peace deal.

There wasn't much to destroy

[Kurdanak]

I won't lie, I like the Tulip flag...

See you all around, I had fun! Over 8b worth of fun  

[Jacob Knox]

On 4/29/2025 at 9:28 PM, penpiko said:

Fake, I’d never sign off on peace with Rose

Bro is one of the Japanese soldiers on a random Pacific island that hasn't been told the war is over yet.