Ronald Wilson Reagan Posted June 2, 2022 Share Posted June 2, 2022 Rather tedious and petty, I know, but then again, I think it could be convenient; especially after that whole Cosmonauts-Aurora thing (but let's not jump into that rabbit hole). I think some content contained in the message history would be; "[1st Leader Title/ 1st Leader Name] of [1st Nation Name] submitted a peace offering to [2nd Leader Title/ 2nd Leader Name] of [2nd Nation Name]. The proposed truce was [approved/denied/ignored/revoked] (approved if peace was accepted, denied if peace was declined using (may need a refresh on whether or not specific military action for "decline peace offering" is present) specific decline peace military action, ignored for decline by military action, and revoked if peace offering was taken back by offerer). An example would be: John Doe of Example Nation submitted a peace offering to Anonymous of Test Nation. The proposed truce was ignored. If the peace was accepted, the message could just be "John Doe of Example Nation submitted a peace offering to Anonymous of Test Nation.", followed by the usual message for when a peace deal is accepted and the war ends in a seperate textbox. Open to criticism. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob Knox Posted June 2, 2022 Share Posted June 2, 2022 I think just one for when it was offered would be fine. This would help clarify confusions of who broke a standing peace offer/agreement. This would mildly prevent abuse/spam of offering, taking it back, offering, taking it back, etc. 1 4 Quote Federation of Knox Enlightened of Chaos, Event Horizon QA Team and API Team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronald Wilson Reagan Posted June 2, 2022 Author Share Posted June 2, 2022 (edited) 6 hours ago, Jacob Knox said: I think just one for when it was offered would be fine. This would help clarify confusions of who broke a standing peace offer/agreement. This would mildly prevent abuse/spam of offering, taking it back, offering, taking it back, etc. I think the spam/abuse could be moderated, likely just the bare minimum of 5 moderation points or so, unless it's continual. I would guess it doesn't really harm anyone outside of people reviewing the actual war history but would be super annoying. Or add a cooldown for peace offerings. Edited June 3, 2022 by Federative Woodstock some clarifications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alice Kryze Posted June 2, 2022 Share Posted June 2, 2022 Ironic from the war dogger 2 Quote Your fav goth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronald Wilson Reagan Posted June 5, 2022 Author Share Posted June 5, 2022 On 6/2/2022 at 4:59 PM, Alice Kryze said: Ironic from the war dogger bark sorry i got nothin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.