Alliance War Declaration

[Aisha Greyjoy]

I'd like to see an option for an alliance to officially declare war via an in-game mechanic.

The benefit?
 

Maybe alliances at war with each other can have a -35%/+100% war range instead of the current range.  This would also facilitate better war ranges at the top of the spectrum somewhat.

[Aeon Helikos]

I quickly clicked on the title because I thought this was a DoW hahaha. 

[iljohn]

I would also like it if you do a alliance war that it shows the infa destroyed and the troops lost on both sides to get more of a feel of who's winning

[Stanislaw Sikorski]

I would also like it if you do a alliance war that it shows the infa destroyed and the troops lost on both sides to get more of a feel of who's winning

It should be based on who has won the most wars between nations instead. If a nation suffered huge losses that would have too much of an effect on deciding the winner for just one nation losing a war with heavy losses.

[Speaker Faris Wheeler]

I thought you were declaring war on somebody Aisha 

[Shellhound]

It should be based on who has won the most wars between nations instead. If a nation suffered huge losses that would have too much of an effect on deciding the winner for just one nation losing a war with heavy losses.

losing a war sucks but it's a good thing if you're getting you're ass kicked because you get 5 full days to rebuild. Infra costs quite a bit and is what people are using to decide who has won/lost a war.

[Aisha Greyjoy]

I thought you were declaring war on somebody Aisha 

Are you volunteering?

[Speaker Faris Wheeler]

Are you volunteering?

No I am not

[Ashland]

I actually think that that's a meritorious suggestion.

[Geronimo]

I like this idea. Hopefully Sheepy will come up and make it happen.

[Reagan]

I don't want to see the war ranges changed, regardless of whether it's an alliance war or individual war.  Otherwise, more in game options are always nice.

[Hansarius]

It should be based on who has won the most wars between nations instead. If a nation suffered huge losses that would have too much of an effect on deciding the winner for just one nation losing a war with heavy losses.

 

Ironically, the amount of defeated nations in an alliance war isn't that interesting unless it is overwhelmingly one-sided (in which case you hardly need it sumarized) 

It's optimal to keep an enemy out of beige so that you can keep attacking him and have other nations declare on him when the war  runs out.

 

But having alliance wars an in game mechanic could be an interesting addition, as well as the suggested war-time statistics of forces and infra lost.

Maybe another addition could be made that there's an option to look up all enemy nations within range and slots open?

[Don Juan]

Ironically, the amount of defeated nations in an alliance war isn't that interesting unless it is overwhelmingly one-sided (in which case you hardly need it sumarized) 

It's optimal to keep an enemy out of beige so that you can keep attacking him and have other nations declare on him when the war  runs out.

 

But having alliance wars an in game mechanic could be an interesting addition, as well as the suggested war-time statistics of forces and infra lost.

Maybe another addition could be made that there's an option to look up all enemy nations within range and slots open?

I like that idea, saves having to do target lists and the like.