[Poll] Should we do a Run-Off Vote for the GW19 Vote

[MinesomeMC]

A lot of you have been asking for this, so ill have yall vote on it

Edited October 5, 2021 by MinesomeMC

[Arln]

Why though

[Miller]

Just now, Arln said:

Why though

So the process for naming the war takes at least 3 times as long as the actual war lasted duh. 

[MinesomeMC]

Just now, Arln said:

Why though

People have been asking for it since, they only voted brawlywood to not have e522 as a war name. 

[JadenStar10]

Run Off.

[zigbigadorlou]

People will have the same reason to vote since me and the bois gonna make sure its hard to win against E522. 

[WarriorSoul]

I will literally vote e522 out of spite

[MinesomeMC]

10 minutes ago, WarriorSoul said:

I will literally vote e522 out of spite

[Indger]

yes 

[Rewan Demontay]

We must extend the vote once more!

 

[Arln]

11 hours ago, WarriorSoul said:

I will literally vote e522 out of spite

This is why I left you. Waso funny huh?

[KiWilliam]

So I'm a decently active player of the game, and I missed this poll.

Not that such a thing should revolve around me and how often I check the forums, but the fact that you take such a snippet of the population of the game to "vote" for the "name" of something the good majority of the game participates in (the global wars), is just forum poster on head smart.

Just have the winning coalition make the name of the wars part of the peace terms and be done with this game. How many people do I have to pay off to slide into a dm to request another round of voting? Is that number 4 people? I could ask my friend(s) and pay 3 people a million dollars a piece to do that.