Ivan VII Posted May 2, 2021 Share Posted May 2, 2021 It's not fair that the same amount of resistance is lost when in the ground battle, there is no soldiers for the country that you declared war on or are defending themsleves. 3 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rin Posted May 2, 2021 Share Posted May 2, 2021 There's some merit to the idea. If they have no soldiers and can't rebuy, they've already lost or are inactive. But 30 is too much imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hidude45454 Posted May 2, 2021 Share Posted May 2, 2021 Not enough imo, I think they should lose at least 50 resistance per attack :serious: 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan VII Posted May 3, 2021 Author Share Posted May 3, 2021 1 hour ago, Rin said: There's some merit to the idea. If they have no soldiers and can't rebuy, they've already lost or are inactive. But 30 is too much imo. Yes, but how 'bout that if in the battle, if one side has no soldiers, that they completely lose? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 41 minutes ago, Ivan VII said: Yes, but how 'bout that if in the battle, if one side has no soldiers, that they completely lose? stop whining about soldiers please, your ideas are completely OP and ridiculous 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majima Goro Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 3 hours ago, hidude45454 said: Not enough imo, I think they should lose at least 50 resistance per attack :serious: 99 per attack Take it or leave it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.