ELPINCHAZO Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Nah I did conspire to report one of his posts two days ago. I will post the logs! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayayay Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 (edited) Nah I did conspire to report one of his posts two days ago.Inb4 Mr. Blonde dumps forum report logs Edited October 27, 2014 by underlordgc 3 Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 UPN, how do you react to charges that your offensive was unimpressive? Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kappa Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 UPN, how do you react to charges that your offensive was unimpressive? I think you made some incorrect assessments... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grillick Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 UPN, how do you react to charges that your impressions were inoffensive? Quote "It's hard to be a team player when you're omnipotent." - Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Given the amount of flak we've gotten in this thread, I'd say that "neutral" is relative. Oh I'm sorry. Next time your ally declares war on someone and gets owned because it bit off more than it can chew and then needs allies to further join into the fight, we'll be sure to pat you on the back and say, "Good doggy, such a good doggy!" I think all the "flak" really started when you tried to claim you/your allies were not the aggressors and all of us "neutrals" pretty much uniformly disagreed and laughed at that notion. Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 I think you made some incorrect assessments... Are you saying that the charges are false? Are you saying that UPN's offensive against TAC was impressive? Don't read indignant tone, I'm really just asking. Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kappa Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Are you saying that the charges are false? Are you saying that UPN's offensive against TAC was impressive? Don't read indignant tone, I'm really just asking. It's a 3v1... It doesn't really need much more thought than that imo. Tbh, the war has really made me appreciate how the EoS/UPN/DEIC treaty bloc have stood together, time and time again, as one united entity (high-fives to newest member as well <3)... In those regards, I find us impressive whenever we take action as a group. I've not stopped to worry about the execution of the war because it's irrelevant to how I would evaluate UPN. Hence, my reaction, and I'm sure other UPN'ers reaction, is indifferent to whatever the impression, of our execution of war (isolated to UPN-TAC), is. Your question was a provocative question and I replied to it with the same attitude as I replied to some of the other "third party" provocative comments within this thread -- defensively, brah... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 There's no denying the strong ties UPN has on purple. Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardofthedragon Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why can't we all just roast marshmallows and be friends? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Armstrong Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 (edited) Edited October 31, 2014 by Tim Armstrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAI-40 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why can't we all just roast marshmallows and be friends? This is Politics & War, not Politics & S'more 4 Quote "They're turning kids into slaves just to make cheaper sneakers. But what's the real cost? ‘Cause the sneakers don't seem that much cheaper. Why are we still paying so much for sneakers when you got them made by little slave kids? What are your overheads?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayayay Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 This is Politics & War, not Politics & S'more 1 Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saru Posted October 29, 2014 Author Share Posted October 29, 2014 Are you saying that the charges are false? Are you saying that UPN's offensive against TAC was impressive? Don't read indignant tone, I'm really just asking. I think the fact that two out of my three targets fled TAC in a day would say differently. Instead of going off rhetoric, why don't you look at the stats? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHAf6jI5DcirEzb_qePEvG6aSZLr4CZcb9WO3QjEhew/pubhtml# Keep in mind that our performance would of been a hell of a lot better, if some mistakes weren't made and people did not beige TAC so early -- a lot of our guys are struggling for targets, and there's only so many slots. Quote Second in Command of UPN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernard1 Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Is it time to reveal the reveal true reason why you guys declare on TAC? For god sake stop dishing out those fake excuses, we are not as stupid as you want us to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayayay Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Is it time to reveal the reveal true reason why you guys declare on TAC? For god sake stop dishing out those fake excuses, we are not as stupid as you want us to be. If you think we have a reason beyond self-preservation than you yourself are a fool. No one really wants a war this early in the game but diplomatic posturing forced it. Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwynn Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 If you think we have a reason beyond self-preservation than you yourself are a fool. No one really wants a war this early in the game but diplomatic posturing forced it. Now it was simply posturing and not an actual threat to the alliance? You guys backpedal quickly. Quote He's right, I'm such a stinker. Play my exceptional game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shellhound Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 If you think we have a reason beyond self-preservation than you yourself are a fool. No one really wants a war this early in the game but diplomatic posturing forced it. If you think TAC was a threat to your entire bloc and by destroying them that's self preservation then you are a fool. Though I know you're probably joking. Or at least you'll claim you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayayay Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Now it was simply posturing and not an actual threat to the alliance? You guys backpedal quickly. They were a threat because they postured themselves into being a threat to us. Had they not postured themselves into a posturing position that postures to create a threat into a really big threat that can be postured into an even bigger threat, then this would never have happened. Edit: Posture 3 Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoS Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Note to self: don't make hypothetical strategies. Or do, in order to watch pre-empt hit a brick wall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ooohu Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 It's the start of a race and one team have proclaimed victory after the first lap... and yet there are many more laps left to run. I wonder who'll be in the lead when the race is finally all said and done? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Clooney Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Now it was simply posturing and not an actual threat to the alliance? You guys backpedal quickly. So it's your contention that there can be no threat implied by someone who is posturing? It's a good thing we have a behavioral expert around like you to explain everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Khestra Posted October 30, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 30, 2014 So it's your contention that there can be no threat implied by someone who is posturing? UPN: Igor! EoS (after stabbing TAC with an electric prod): Yes, master? UPN: Why do you torment that thing so? EoS: It's what I do. UPN Igor. . .do unto others? EoS: Yes. . .before they do unto me! The above is this war in a nutshell, and makes just as much logical sense. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 (edited) It's the start of a race and one team have proclaimed victory after the first lap... and yet there are many more laps left to run. I wonder who'll be in the lead when the race is finally all said and done? GPA will lead after this race, and after every subsequent race too. Unless we see another Woodstock Massacre. The motivation to do one of those every 6 months won't be there, and eventually they'll be #1 and too strong to easily challenge. Edited October 30, 2014 by Aisha Greyjoy Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoS Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 GPA will lead after this race, and after every subsequent race too. Unless we see another Woodstock Massacre. The motivation to do one of those every 6 months won't be there, and eventually they'll be #1 and too strong to easily challenge. They'll be rich pacifists = more war resources for the rest of us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.