Kalishma Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 I have an suggestion about the Embargo. The first suggestion is the country can set a length on how long the embargo can be. The second suggestion is that the country can automatically set an embargo for example. Nation A does an intelligent gathering on Nation B, Nation B will automatically set an 60 day embargo onNation A and a 30 day embargo on the Nation A's alliance if it was caught and identify, Nation A can also make it permanent. Additional things: 1. If Two alliance has the MDoAP, MDP, ODP, PIAT, and ODoAP, on eachother can place a limit on how long embargo can lasts and set how many of the alliance members they can permanently embargo on the other alliance, if both alliances agree on the limit. 2. The list of things that if the other nation do, the embargo can automatically start by the victim nation. Declaration of War, other kind of Espionage (if caught and identified), and bounty. 3. The embargo can also be extended manually and atomatically if the nation nuked the other nation. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Scarfalot Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Actually, these are pretty okay ideas if they're optional. Though bounties are meant to be completely confidential, so a retaliatory embargo wouldn't work since that'd give away the game. The rest are decent 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigbigadorlou Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 I definitely agree length could be a good option. I definitely have a lot of embargos that I don't remember why I added. 1 Quote Hey Krampus, the signature edit is under account settings. Actually, here's the link. https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/settings/signature/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted February 13, 2021 Wiki Mod Share Posted February 13, 2021 Auto expiry is meh, I can think of many things that are better uses of dev time but it won't actually break anything. The rest is honestly shear laziness, like going into minecraft and thinking it should have diamond blocks in the ground instead of ore. And I also find the suggestion of even further limiting player/player interaction based on alliance level edicts to be ill advised. Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigbigadorlou Posted February 13, 2021 Share Posted February 13, 2021 7 hours ago, Dr Rush said: The rest is honestly shear laziness, like going into minecraft and thinking it should have diamond blocks in the ground instead of ore. Great idea! We should have a P&W creative mode Quote Hey Krampus, the signature edit is under account settings. Actually, here's the link. https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/settings/signature/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.