Jump to content

An appeal to Phoenyx


Raphael
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Phoenyx said:

 

Tyrion hasn't spoken to me since last Sunday. I have heard from a third party that it's because I've revealed a lot of what he's said. So no, I don't just do what Tyrion thinks is best. But I -do- believe that he has always been honest with me. His story and Kaz's story also fully corroborate each other. And while Ronnie's differs slightly, the bottom line is the same- there was no plan to attack you guys. 

You... you made that reference without even knowing what you were referencing?!?!

QMgq7cz.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:

 

Cute unicorn :-p. Now do you want to explain yourself or do you just want to be cryptic?

I

MADE

A

LINK

but here you go again: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Literature/SwordOfTruth

Warning: Tvtropes.

 

Also that's not a hecking unicorn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

I

MADE

A

LINK

but here you go again: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Literature/SwordOfTruth

Warning: Tvtropes.

 

Also that's not a hecking unicorn.

 

 

I now see that you linked a word to the url above in your last post. To be fair, it wasn't exactly very prominently placed. I usually put a "here" when I link in text to make it a little clearer that there's a link. Still not sure how it connected to my post, but anyway, I'll quote from your link in the interests of actually getting somewhere in this conversation:

**

"People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true. People are stupid; they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so are all the easier to fool."

**

 

Right off the hop, not really a fan of the text, what with insulting people in general. That being said, I -do- agree that many people are far too confident in what they think to be true. As the old saying goes: "It's not what we don't know that gets us into trouble. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so." 

 

This is why I've been so interested in getting to the -sources- of the narratives that have been built up. Your side that HM/TCW/Swamp was going to attack Quack, our side with Ronnie's perception that Swamp wanted to attack Quack. Seems I'm one of the few people actually interested in examining the sources of information.

 

Anyway, what is that creature if not a unicorn? Kind of looks like one of the characters in "my little pony". But it does seem to have a horn too, so...?

Edited by Phoenyx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:

-blahblahblah-

That's it. You've gone and done it now. Your incredible lack of self-awareness and willingness to jump to conclusions based on negligible levels of research has led me to the conclusion that you are not worth talking to.

Grow up a bit and maybe that'll change, but I'm done with you now.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

That's it. You've gone and done it now. Your incredible lack of self-awareness and willingness to jump to conclusions based on negligible levels of research has led me to the conclusion that you are not worth talking to.

Grow up a bit and maybe that'll change, but I'm done with you now.

 

Cryptic remarks, followed by more cryptic remarks -.-. One thing, you never see me "quoting" someone I'm talking to as saying "blabla". I listen to what people say. Do I always understand everything they're trying to convey? Certainly not. But I at least respect them enough to not twist what they say into some caricaturized version. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Phoenyx said:

Cryptic remarks, followed by more cryptic remarks -.-

Alright, if that's too hard for you to understand, I'll make it simpler:

I don't want to talk to you since you're being immature and that has stopped being amusing.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

Alright, if that's too hard for you to understand, I'll make it simpler:

I don't want to talk to you since you're being immature and that has stopped being amusing.

Assuming? You're not one to speak about assuming.  Most of the people who have been responding here besides me and Phoenyx, (including down votes) are not ones to speak about assuming.  Look up back at y'alls past statements, even beyond this thread.  Full of insults, threats, demands, and claimless criticisms. You guys are being are elitist toxic hypocrites. If you guys were actually better than most, you'd actually care, help, & support the community as a whole. Not continue acting like stuck-up preppy bullies, who only considerate of those very close & well trusted to ones self. Thus is overbearingly childish.  Until you guys prove yourselves better than how you truly acting, follow these simple instructions.

 

782795701851258900.gif

2102335090_Screenshot_20201130-0120172.png.763a310c8338cb9b6c4ce5086f366db6.png

 

 

Edited by Firwof Kromwell
It will be a better place, so we don't have to hear you guys
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 7

 

                            memed-iFirwof650x150.jpeg.9a92ea222b9010f9fae97a1864a6759e.jpeg     

 I personally voice my own thought processes based on own desires of informational curiosity as well love for discussion based on questions & statements I made rather just trusting info like a collective hivemind

Onlookers whom hop aboard the brainless bandwagon refusing inter-articulation based on assumed feelings, go give yo balls a tug ya tit fugger         

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Firwof Kromwell said:

Assuming? You're not one to speak about assuming.  Most of the people who have been responding here besides me and Phoenyx, (including down votes) are not ones to speak about assuming.  Look up back at y'alls past statements, even beyond this thread.  Full of insults, threats, demands, and claimless criticisms. You guys are being are elitist toxic hypocrites. If you guys were actually better than most, you'd actually care, help, & support the community as a whole. Not continue acting like stuck-up preppy bullies, who only considerate of those very close & well trusted to ones self. Thus is overbearingly childish.  Until you guys prove yourselves better than how you truly acting, follow these simple instructions.

 

782795701851258900.gif

2102335090_Screenshot_20201130-0120172.png.763a310c8338cb9b6c4ce5086f366db6.png

 

 

 

16 minutes ago, Prefontaine said:

He said amusing. 

Big oof. 

 

 

  • Haha 1

 

os9LcJK.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:

So he did. We all make mistakes. I think his main points were good though. 

We're talking about a guy who just several posts earlier was saying "well actually IQ was good", so his credibility to make any point was pretty much shot at that point.

Further, his main points were bad.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, WarriorSoul said:

We're talking about a guy who just several posts earlier was saying "well actually IQ was good", so his credibility to make any point was pretty much shot at that point.

Further, his main points were bad.

Alright, from everything I've heard of IQ, I can't defend them, but perhaps he didn't know them that well. Anyway, I think his main points were good :-). 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Phoenyx said:

Tyrion hasn't spoken to me since last Sunday. I have heard from a third party that it's because I've revealed a lot of what he's said. 

Who ever could have predicted this outcome?

  • Like 1

Worst Poster Ever (2011)
zapdos.jpg.28ab9e9c974c8dc4fc52998d0e3adf14.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Phoenyx said:

Alright, from everything I've heard of IQ, I can't defend them, but perhaps he didn't know them that well. Anyway, I think his main points were good :-). 

It's more of I actually got to talk to people in IQ. Get to know them better. I honestly befriended a few people in IQ, especially in GOONS & Camelot. To me, it more felt they weren't being really toxic to the whole community.  Just to the people that were toxic before them in the first place, taste of y'all's own medicine. Which you guys didn't really take very well through, plenty of fits.  Heh,you guys still throw fits even nowadays. This thread and threads like it are great examples.  Infact, you guys who choose to be that way are the only ones that usually do complain about people being toxic to yourselves. That's just more hypocrisy ya sensitive Sally's.  I've also realized that most of the people that were in IQ or allied to them, are the ones you guys are targeting as well as them not being active as often. So take some time, get your panties out of a twist, which it seems they're really quite scrunched up, & figure stuff out. 

  • Downvote 2

 

                            memed-iFirwof650x150.jpeg.9a92ea222b9010f9fae97a1864a6759e.jpeg     

 I personally voice my own thought processes based on own desires of informational curiosity as well love for discussion based on questions & statements I made rather just trusting info like a collective hivemind

Onlookers whom hop aboard the brainless bandwagon refusing inter-articulation based on assumed feelings, go give yo balls a tug ya tit fugger         

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Firwof Kromwell said:

IQ kool-aid propaganda

stating that you gladly support some of the worst people to ever play the game, through their cheating, lying, proud destruction of communities, and attempts to ruin the game altogether should say enough about your character to anyone observing.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Fair is fair, I moved the other thread to the National Affairs forum (as it was a direct nation-to-nation appeal) and so I have moved this one as well.

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1

Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest It

Forums Rules | Game Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Firwof Kromwell said:

It's more of I actually got to talk to people in IQ. Get to know them better. I honestly befriended a few people in IQ, especially in GOONS & Camelot. To me, it more felt they weren't being really toxic to the whole community.  Just to the people that were toxic before them in the first place, taste of y'all's own medicine. Which you guys didn't really take very well through, plenty of fits.  Heh,you guys still throw fits even nowadays. This thread and threads like it are great examples.  Infact, you guys who choose to be that way are the only ones that usually do complain about people being toxic to yourselves. That's just more hypocrisy ya sensitive Sally's.  I've also realized that most of the people that were in IQ or allied to them, are the ones you guys are targeting as well as them not being active as often. So take some time, get your panties out of a twist, which it seems they're really quite scrunched up, & figure stuff out. 

Finding a group that ragequit after being exposed for cheating more palatable than you find us is more an indictment of yourself than it is of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WarriorSoul said:

Finding a group that ragequit after being exposed for cheating more palatable than you find us is more an indictment of yourself than it is of us.

Not merely that, but went into a hissyfit including but not limited to accusing the platform of child pornography distribution.

The rest, might eventually be forgivable given contrition (which won't happen), but that? Irredeemable in this lifetime.

@Firwof Kromwell, you're suggesting that they accused the administrator of distributing child porn because... Alex gave them temporary bans for cheating? I'm sincerely hoping that I'm misreading what you're writing, because your takes are beyond garbage right now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, epsteindidntkillhimself said:

stating that you gladly support some of the worst people to ever play the game, through their cheating, lying, proud destruction of communities, and attempts to ruin the game altogether should say enough about your character to anyone observing. 

This is coming from a person who started their nation after they were long gone, and only has been fed with their friends have told them about, and doesn't even research into things. Speaking of not reseaching things, that reminds me of when you got history of that one alliance wrong & refused to fix it...

 

  • Downvote 5

 

                            memed-iFirwof650x150.jpeg.9a92ea222b9010f9fae97a1864a6759e.jpeg     

 I personally voice my own thought processes based on own desires of informational curiosity as well love for discussion based on questions & statements I made rather just trusting info like a collective hivemind

Onlookers whom hop aboard the brainless bandwagon refusing inter-articulation based on assumed feelings, go give yo balls a tug ya tit fugger         

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Firwof Kromwell said:

more IQ kool-aid drinking

 

i don’t need to “research” how someone sending child pornography made them absolutely despicable human beings. you defending them shows me, and everyone observing, everything about your character. it isn’t something flattering.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, epsteindidntkillhimself said:

i don’t need to “research” how someone sending child pornography made them absolutely despicable human beings. you defending them shows me, and everyone observing, everything about your character. it isn’t something flattering.

Ah, to be fair, IQ never sent child pornography as far as I am aware. What they did was slander the game and the administrator by claiming that he was sending child porn, and repeating those claims in public reviews on app stores and in reports to publishers that carried the P&W application. (Which is very obviously grounds for a civil suit at least; the defamation and devalument of Alex's intellectual property is very real).

Oh, they also apparently harassed Alex's family with death threats. So there's that too.

I just wanted to make sure that you didn't misunderstand.

Edited by Sir Scarfalot
Oh they also did that
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.