Morgoth57 Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 (edited) Say, for example, a powerful raider attacks an alliance member. The alliance member is too weak to fight back on his own, so he calls upon his alliance buddies to help fight back. Now, say that everyone in the alliance is too weak to take on the raider individually. No problem! The way Politics and War currently works, one of those alliance members is going to perform a suicide charge to weaken the raider while sacrificing his own men on masse, so others can actually win. This is a major problem, and is highly illogical. There should be some way where alliance members can lend strength to other alliance members, where members can lend their military units temporarily to another member so that a joint attack can be performed. Let's be honest, a suicide charge is stupid. Let's make it so that wars are actually winnable without massive, unnecessary loss of life, and where smaller alliances actually have a chance to survive. Edited November 6, 2020 by Morgoth57 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potato Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 You really think this would have the effect of "smaller alliances having a chance to survive"? That alone tells me you haven't given it enough thought. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealMichaelJordan Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 This could easily be abused not by micros, but by macros. So this feature would be broken Quote too sick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.