Jump to content

[DoW]Planes go BRRRR


Exar Kun -George
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/30/2020 at 9:05 PM, Azazel said:

Acknowledging the fact that Quack shows no signs of breaking and dismantling the hegemonic power they created, a kind of power they had both claimed to hate prior, Camelot has been put in a position where we feel we have no choice but to bring forth our Kingdom’s Complaints and Grievances.

 

Complaints and Grievances.

  • Quack’s existence as a hegemonic power, showing no signs of relenting their stranglehold of the game's politics.

 

TL;DR: Once we fought with a hegemonic power, today we atone and unite against one


Really?

Honestly, I sat on this post for about 10 minutes, before just giving up on any further reply.
 

  • Haha 1

In paradisum deducant te Angeli; in tuo adventu suscipiant te martyres, et perducant te in civitatem sanctam Ierusalem.
Chorus angelorum te suscipiat, et cüm Lazaro quondam paupere æternam habeas requiem.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for a fact Quack turned down Fark, DB, and tCW because we didn't want to tmany treaties. So the whole CB is a little ironic considering it was mostly HM-Rose-Swamp sphere who were trying to consolidate a mega sphere.

"Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, James II said:

I know for a fact Quack turned down Fark, DB, and tCW because we didn't want to tmany treaties they are terrible. So the whole CB is a little ironic considering it was mostly HM-Rose-Swamp sphere who were trying to consolidate a mega sphere.

I mean you don't need to be nice at this point.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Prefonteen said:

Can we take a moment to step away from arrgh and admire the hypocrisy of this DoW?

I feel it's gone under-noticed.

This DoW is going to be remembered for a long time for truly legendary levels of hypocrisy and unintentional irony.

Worst Poster Ever (2011)
zapdos.jpg.28ab9e9c974c8dc4fc52998d0e3adf14.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Insert Name Here Thank you for the honest and insightful assessment. I agree with you 100% on this and I applaud your willingness to say things that may not be completely in line with your sphere's narrative. It's a refreshing thing to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the sorry ass alliance that got their second in command, @Epi shook af by a random reroll that didn't even participate in the war he was clowning them on

 

I do applaud an entry to a dogpile with a positive Net 😄

  • Upvote 1
Lxr4VfE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/2/2020 at 12:08 AM, Insert Name Here said:

PS: whoever is doing it, please stop trying to pretend an aggressive / defensive strike wasn't prepared for Quack. I know how coalition warfare works, the fact that counters were instant and organized (with alliance pairings perfectly allocated) shows there was collaboration prior, people should start owning up to their wars, In this case, it was "hit or be hit" for Quack. 

I wouldn't be surprised if this is the move forward in the game.  KETOGG leadership collaborated with Chaos leadership, that if anybody interfered in our war - we'd stop and immediately turn on the people who interfered, for example.  So I'm not surprised about sphere collaboration here.

Not really adding onto an argument here, just adding a perspective as the game moves forward.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Buorhann said:

I wouldn't be surprised if this is the move forward in the game.  KETOGG leadership collaborated with Chaos leadership, that if anybody interfered in our war - we'd stop and immediately turn on the people who interfered, for example.  So I'm not surprised about sphere collaboration here.

Not really adding onto an argument here, just adding a perspective as the game moves forward.

Not before the war lol. That happened after the war started, when we kept hearing rumors that BK was looking to hit one or both of us while at war. That's worlds away from making a defensive pact before there is ever a war or making a coalition in advance, which is what INH is referring to.

  • Upvote 4

BrOQBND.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Adrienne said:

Not before the war lol. That happened after the war started, when we kept hearing rumors that BK was looking to hit one or both of us while at war. That's worlds away from making a defensive pact before there is ever a war or making a coalition in advance, which is what INH is referring to.

I can confirm. As a matter of fact, Chaos was unwilling to hit either sphere w/KETOGG, and when asked about what if of one of the spheres hitting us, they had said something to the tune of "We'll weigh in the situation and then decide whether to assist or not." (for clarification's sake, this being before Surf's Up had started).

Which is actually far more in line with the spirit of minispheres (well, multispheres at this point), than the empty preaching thereof whilst simultaneously covertly engaging in practices which entirely undermine it's foundations which we've seen happen as of late.

Edited by Shiho Nishizumi
Mobile is wonky.
  • Upvote 3
 
G3.gif.d8066d8dc749ad2d0835fe69095fa73b.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will my Gag Order stop me from telling everybody how shit this alliance will be after we roll the living frick out of them? @Akuryo @Epi @Azazel @King Arthur and whoever the frick

How about how shit it already is given its history?

Lxr4VfE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.