Recent Changes to P&W [Poll]

[Changeup]

Do you support the recent changes to the game? What exactly is good or bad? What changes would you like to see? Answer the poll and discuss below.

Edited May 15, 2020 by Changeup

[Polar Bear ArcticExplorer]

Some suggestions to Alex in terms of future projects.

(1) Make research trees, that way, more in depth projects could be made. Anyone could go through any branch at any time regardless of if they've already done a different branch. This way it is possible to have the entire research tree. 

(2) Make strategy and land a more important part of the game. At the moment, there is no strategy or use for land during war. I believe there should be a strategy research tree in which one can explore many (or all) different strategies which would be very good for war. This could be used instead of the weird changes made where tanks can destroy planes. Furthermore, if a nation has more land, it should take more time to move through. Along with this, the soldiers would be more spread out. Finally, nations never really put their whole militaries in battles. Instead only a small fraction usually participates in one battle. This should either be changed, or kept the same way it is. (This final one is not too major anyways to be honest).

(3) Make new military units along with the more trained/elite type of strategy and units I talked about above. This way, the strategy tree and more elite units would also have new military units to face (suggested by Vali)

(4) Listen to the people first Alex.

Edited May 15, 2020 by Polar Bear ArcticExplorer
Arctic Added On

[Polo G]

1 minute ago, Polar Bear ArcticExplorer said:

Some suggestions to Alex in terms of future projects.

(1) Make research trees, that way, more in depth projects could be made. Anyone could go through any branch at any time regardless of if they've already done a different branch. This way it is possible to have the entire research tree. 

(2) Make strategy and land a more important part of the game. At the moment, there is no strategy or use for land during war. I believe there should be a strategy research tree in which one can explore many (or all) different strategies which would be very good for war. This could be used instead of the weird changes made where tanks can destroy planes. Furthermore, if a nation has more land, it should take more time to move through. Along with this, the soldiers would be more spread out. Finally, nations never really put their whole militaries in battles. Instead only a small fraction usually participates in one battle. This should either be changed, or kept the same way it is. (This final one is not too major anyways to be honest).

(3) Listen to the people first Alex.

I like the land idea 

[Polar Bear ArcticExplorer]

1 minute ago, Ayo said:

I like the land idea 

Yeah, it will bring new purposes to land. It was originally brought up by Elijah Mikaelson actually......this is sort of awkward now lol.

[Sweeeeet Ronny D]

oh the guy with the most land in the game wanted to make land more important? worlds biggest shocker there.

[Changeup]

8 minutes ago, Ayo said:

I like the land idea 

What purpose would land serve in this game? How would it become part of the war meta?

[Polar Bear ArcticExplorer]

1 minute ago, Changeup said:

What purpose would land serve in this game? How would it become part of the war meta?

Read the post from above.

[Libervalley]

I like how the score for tanks were lowered because the value wasn't worth the points considering what nations you would be up against.