Big Boss Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 I was mulling over my thoughts this past week and thought of this. First world nations help third world nations develop in the real world, this could be because the cost to produce more buildings gets lower or even other things like supply lines are developed. My proposition is this- Over time, say a year, a cities cost should go down, by say 1% a month or some other small amount. that way, when new players join later on, it's easier for them to start building. otherwise we'll see no change in current lineup besides war. it'll always be the older the nation it is, the stronger it is. 1 Quote "We pull in money, new recruits, all just to combat cipher, rubbing our noses in bloody battlefield dirt, all for revenge." "Why are we still here? Just to suffer? Every night i can feel my leg, and my arm, even my fingers. The body i've lost, The comrades i've lost, won't stop hurting... it's like they're all still there... You feel it too, don't you?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayayay Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 Older nations send money to newer ones, problem solved 1 Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted September 21, 2014 Author Share Posted September 21, 2014 Older nations send money to newer ones, problem solved what happens in the case of smaller nations with no friends in the higher up? Quote "We pull in money, new recruits, all just to combat cipher, rubbing our noses in bloody battlefield dirt, all for revenge." "Why are we still here? Just to suffer? Every night i can feel my leg, and my arm, even my fingers. The body i've lost, The comrades i've lost, won't stop hurting... it's like they're all still there... You feel it too, don't you?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atzuya Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 In that case they'll have a slightly better avenue for growth. Either they can join the now blooming market and make profit off the inevitably expensive resources, or raid the plethora of inactive nationss that are bound to flood the 50-300 NS. As the game grows, it will become easier for smaller nations to get off their own feet. As for the suggestion... no. City price is already good enough as it is. If your concern is that new nations that have no friends will have a difficulties in growing up, then they can always join an established alliance. Even a veteran player with years of experience under their belt will have a hard time growing alone without the security a solid alliance can offer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 what happens in the case of smaller nations with no friends in the higher up? They should join a real alliance, then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan I Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 Even if Sheepy adds to the game, it will probably be only 0.1% per 6 months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilhelm IV Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 All this will means s that if the game is around a few years from now, bigger nations will end up with stupid amount of cities, resulting in them growing to silly size. Yep no, your suggestion will just make all nations larger, larger nations will be even larger, gaining the opposite effect from what you want here. In the long term, city costs will hit 0 at some point, which will brake the game. They should join a real alliance, then. I concur there. It's the same with some of the people on here who !@#$ about being raided, if they want to avoid being raided, they should join an alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sailor Jerry Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 what happens in the case of smaller nations with no friends in the higher up? Then they stay a 3rd world power......not everyone IRL is a 1st/top tier nation. There is also politics involved here as well......if you go it alone or join an alliance. Building cities.......not sure why costs would go down......but negotiating good trade deals that are beneficial........that is where a newer nation could help themselves out alot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan I Posted September 21, 2014 Share Posted September 21, 2014 1. This topic would destroy the Republic government. 2. Too overpowered right now, because it was launched in full version back at August 5, and it's only month since his release. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted September 22, 2014 Administrators Share Posted September 22, 2014 In that case they'll have a slightly better avenue for growth. Either they can join the now blooming market and make profit off the inevitably expensive resources, or raid the plethora of inactive nationss that are bound to flood the 50-300 NS. As the game grows, it will become easier for smaller nations to get off their own feet. As for the suggestion... no. City price is already good enough as it is. If your concern is that new nations that have no friends will have a difficulties in growing up, then they can always join an established alliance. Even a veteran player with years of experience under their belt will have a hard time growing alone without the security a solid alliance can offer. Pretty much my thoughts. There's no limit on cash/resource transfer in the game, so even if you join the game 3 years from now, it doesn't mean you'll be forever stuck as a small guy. There will be huge profits in making resources, and those will only increase as time goes on. 2 Quote Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.