Jump to content

TF Peace Announcement


Kosta
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Has anyone in a leadership position said that Chaos pre-empting BK sphere was the wrong thing to do or are you simply peddling bs?

"All Chaos Bloc Alliances of Anti-Memesphere must include a statement recognizing that their CB was outdated and therefore invalid"

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad to see you go TF, however your assistance was appreciated, if not by the minority of people on the various forums, then at least by the majority of folk who are still busy fighting!! 

Whatever your reasons for entering and subsequently leaving, our reasons for continuing the good fight remain sound in the face of the brittle and largely spurious commentary from coalition B.  All the best in your future.

  • Like 1

Celer Et Audax

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Has anyone in a leadership position said that Chaos pre-empting BK sphere was the wrong thing to do or are you simply peddling bs?

Yes, read the leaked logs. It was one of your original surrender terms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Prefonteen said:

If by bs you mean: Statements proven by evidence and logs.

 

Outta here, garden troll.

No. It's pretty simple, he still hasn't proven that anyone said the action of pre-empting was wrong. All he has proven is that a negotiable term says that the CB was outdated and because it was outdated it was invalid to use as a CB. That still doesn't show someone saying that pre-empting as an action was wrong. The evidence provided also only becomes a statement if you agree to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2020 at 6:02 PM, Salt Meat said:

snip

Ok now I understand their decision, bad for us because they were really needed

But I would have done differently, some of their allies are still at war and I believe that leaving them alone is not very honorable, I would continue for a couple of weeks and see if the status quo can be changed, then end with white peace all together (it was pretty clear that IQ was ready to peace with them at any time to avoid having to many nations to fight), the reasons are:

-You don't look like a pixel hugger, some people now think they were waiting for an excuse to peace

-Your players have war experience, you will be ready for future battles

-You look strong, they have a lot of upper tier nations in Fark, WTF, etc. that can kick asses in this situation and a lot of low tiers to fight GOONS and the pigs

-You show that you don't leave any of your allies alone if attacked, the block is strong

Then if you lose TCW will be rolled while you can have white peace and save most of your pixels, if you win you roll TCW post war :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Micchan said:

Then if you lose TCW will be rolled while you can have white peace and save most of your pixels, if you win you roll TCW post war :D

Or TCW can attack the Federation now and possibly expand the war (again)  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2020 at 5:18 AM, brucemna said:

Who cares now about this semantic of validity 8 months later. Deal with today and move on. Seriously this argument is so repetitive it is like coalition A finding a excuse to keep this going. 

Huh, interesting.  What would you say in reference to those citing actions taken back in 2016?

17 hours ago, Singha said:

Or TCW can attack the Federation now and possibly expand the war (again)  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Only one side has attacked their previous support/allies after they got peace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Buorhann said:

Huh, interesting.  What would you say in reference to those citing actions taken back in 2016?

Only one side has attacked their previous support/allies after they got peace.

It is precedence which  was set and in a elawyer way. Now bickering and arguing over semantics constantly in every thread about the who did this and who did that is just well Shut the F... up kind of thing that is just repetitive annoying and most of all unacomplishing.

Edited by brucemna
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, brucemna said:

It is precedence which  was set and in a elawyer way. Now bickering and arguing over semantics constantly in every thread about the who did this and who did that is just well Shut the F... up kind of thing that is just repetitive annoying and most of all unacomplishing.

At what point are you going to realize you're describing yourself? You're tiresome, which is arguably worse than even Minesome.

Edited by Sir Scarfalot
double even
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.